Yo

I see that I missed a conversation about based Huxley. Shame.

I'm curious too.

I don't believe utopias can exist, mind but I think it'd be possible to get close.

Or, at the very least, better than the dumpster fire known as modern civilization.

The baby would obviously be aborted.

Can't have her fans and family getting wise to what's up.

I still have to read that book.

It might help my arguments since I consider the world of Brave New World to be close to a utopia

What kind of discord would help you do something like that?

Silly billy.

He's closer to modern regimes, yeah.

Frankly, it's a pretty smart way to tame the human beast.

Kill them with kindness.

Make them complacent, comfortable and lazy.

I wouldn't bother.

If you want to talk to girls just talk to them.

Stalin pointing at his head

I'm not saying it's easy. I'm just saying it's the most effective method.

Most people size you up within a few second/minutes of meeting you

Especially when it comes to romance and sex

That means they're not interested, even if they don't have a bf. Don't stress over it.

Just don't be desperate. That's never a good way to approach the situation.

I wouldn't care about a girl's political views, so long as they're not totally repugnant

Hell, an opposing view would be interesting

I'm not a communist but hey, to each their own.

@тупой даун hello

Yep.

It was definitely pitched as an all encompassing leftist server

If anything, communism serves to confirm my misanthropy.

Being rich helps.

I'd like to say that personality can make up for it but that's in very rare cases.

They're literally paying for the company. Don't pay any attention to them.

Playing Pacino's Advocate, most systems of government tend to do that

Communism works in theory but it disregards basic human nature.

It does a poor job of taming the human beast.

Same thing with communism. Human nature causes the ego to desire recognition, regardless of how uniform a society is.

Traditional family roles.

That old meme.

Brainlet is an awkward term.

Oh hey, your picture is Q.

I don't think they're trolling.

Calling people brainlets doesn't help, though.

Why is that?

I'm an absurdist. I've kind of stopped expecting anyone to come up with anything that will give us the society we want or need.

Definitely not a right winger.

@Blebleh#1746 that's kind of the point. Who cares? It doesn't matter. Find happiness where you can before you bite it.

That's all anyone ever does tho

This is a hell of a sperg-a-thon

Now I get why your picture is Q

Did Q always call people brainlets? I forget.

Now I understand why I'm having such an instinctive loathing for the term.

I remember being really annoyed by it.

*Joke's on you, I was only pretending to be retarded*

Hey, I'm still center left.

He's RPing Q, my man. Be Sisko, not Picard.

Picard tried to talk to Q and unravel his logic.

Sisko punched him in the face and told him to fuck off.

It's a Star Trek thing.

Specifically how different characters interacted with Q, the omnipotent character 8 is RPing

tl;dr just tell him to fuck off

I'm center left because I consider the political spectrum to be a circle. I also have specific personal views that don't align with some further on the left.

I'm mainly an absurdist and a misanthrope.

I'm center left because I consider the political spectrum to be a circle. I also have specific personal views that don't align with some further on the left.

But we're talking about the economic spectrum and I just realized what I said doesn't apply

Everything has the potential to work in theory. It just doesn't because of basic human nature.

I'm mainly on the left because it appeals to my personal sensibilities.

Socialism is as compatible as any other economic/governmental system

Somewhat but not as much as staunch advocates would believe

You're right. I'm speaking in generalities.

If I ever state anything to be an absolute then that's a mistake on my part.

Human nature is malleable, sure but it's not a reed in the wind.

Some aspects are incredibly difficult to fight because they're on an instinctual level.

People don't necessarily have better conditions in socialist societies.

Humans have a tendency to pervert and corrupt.

Just look at Venezuela.

I'm not saying that it's socialism by any means

But that's what they're calling it

Exactly. A perverted system.

Point is, I think human nature is corruptive.

I think there's something fundamentally wrong with us as a species based on how all of our misery is self-manufactured

I don't think it would help.

I'm not familiar with it

Didn't vanguardism lead to the bloodiest parts of the French Revolution?

But you're RPing Q. I would think you'd embrace chaos.

Good luck trying.

This all relies on people not behaving like people.

I can't be convinced.

No apparatus is perfect.

Even if it's effective initially, it will erode over time

Nothing is completely erased.

It's incredibly doubtful

That's assuming that nobody would question it or even outright reject it

It doesn't take into account straight up contrarians

I prefer cinnamon.

Yo

Defenestrate anyone wearing a Che Guevara shirt

Most of the time, yes.

So many Chinese people