Yes?

This surprises you?

Has she said anything recently?

Idk, have you even seen her 2hr+ interview on Joe Rogan?

I never agreed with her " sensible gun control" bs but I wouldn't call her anti gun as I would the rest of the dems idk

I guess not I'll watch it ty

If you're not in favor of rolling back the National Firearms Act, don't even call yourself pro-2nd amendment

She believes in the gun show and internet loophole bs. And wants strict control

Yang tbh is the least of the bunch

She also wants 16 year olds and confined prisoners to vote

even Britain doesn't do that

prisoner vote

I'm all for reenfranchisement post full sentence served

yes, after release

But while in prison or on parole no

dems would extend the franchise to fetuses and ban abortion if only they would vote democrat

No I would keep them off during parole

after release is already what happens in Britain - seems to work fine

You are essentially probationary member of society at that point

Once your full sentence is up (which includes parole) then by all means

It can sometimes give ex-cons a reason to engage with society... the criminals don't really do much voting in the first place

- street criminal...

...white collar criminals are a different story

The only ones I'm on the fence with are voter fraud felenies

If you knowingly abuse the system I lean towards permanent ban

i think if you're going to let niggers vote, why not criminals?

and same for women really tbf

I think they could have personal vote but be banned from any form of campaign/election involvement

Well that should be the case for campaign infractions. Separate from voter fraud

They probably don't want to get very specific for fear of outlawing all the politicians, LOL

Don't let the disabled vote <:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>

But the whole "they are citizens" arguement is meh. They committed a severe crime against society as a whole. We already limit their citizen rights.

And they arnt fighting for the other rights

There is a case for intelligence tests before being allowed to vote

well, we violate some of their rights on as as needed basis

but those violations serve a necessary purpose

No we blanket ban them from some

not letting them vote doesn't seem like it's necessary or conducive to any particular goal

You can have a financial or campaign felony and cant own a gun

It's a blanket ban. But like I said. While being punished you have even fewer rights. But I would be fine with restoring the vote post punishment. But to me that includes parole

Because to me parole is part of the overall punishment. It is just "you have been good so we are incentivizing that behavior and letting you out of full confinement to a lesser form"