period

you dickless knave

your source is not scientific at all

Let the grown ups talk, please.

@meratrix but they gave individual resumes to a multitude of people mowron

@méep Do you think eastern european (post commie) states are more imbalanced in regard of female scientists than the west?

yes, but it's still the same resume, so, they would need to give multiple pairs of one resume with two different names

that would be better

but you still have the problem of different people evaluating one half of each pair

@franti I don't know about eastern europe

mathematically his source is basically doing 125 C 1
@meratrix

@méep We got more women into tech by forcing them.

No stay at home mums here

@meratrix individual human error is factored out when you repeat the process multiple times

dude

this is science class 5th grade

it's fucking 125 Choose 1

wait

what was the sample size?

125?

👀

lmao

125

125 people, choosing 2 results

there's a possible 7750 combinations

and a very poor margin of error

"The results were surprising—they show that the decision makers did not evaluate the resume purely on its merits. Despite having the exact same qualifications and experience as John"

you know everytime they say that

I want to know what the resume was

Also @méep, to have any inling of reliability in this study they would not only need multiple resumes but multiple fields as well

"Because they perceived the female candidate as less competent, the scientists in the study were less willing to mentor Jennifer or to hire her as a lab manager"
probably because girls won't take that extra step and go futher beyond

Link to the paper: http://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16474.full.pdf

girls are **WAYYYY** less likely to go the extra mile

they'll do lagom and stop

@Deleted User Oh no now the whole "genders dont have natural tendencies" is going to come up

so the question is:

why the fuck would I hire someone who would do lagom, vs a person who would go above and beyond and do that extra crunch of work?

^

@méep doesn't know shit about economics and has never worked a day in its life

@Durtle02 yeah exactly, the "MUH genders dont have natural tendencies"

kek ~~They do tho :p~~

So one thing I noticed, Female faculty are less likely to recommend hiring more females.

And they don't want to mentor female hires.

I wonder why?

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

Well, you have to wonder, because it's not been investigated.

how fucking deceving

because "MUH power politics" ^4

it's only a difference of $4000 yet it looks huge in the graph

Look at that huge differ... oh, where's the zero?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

basic graph manipulation

it's like that stunt nvida pulled

If you're going to remove 25000 just finish off the extra 4000 why dont you?

I don't know of a single journal/conference where this graph would be allowed.

Oh, right... gender studies...

hahahahah

another graph for you guys

would you look at that, the female faculty want to hire more male students

muh internal muhsoggyknees amirite?

OH AND LOOK AT THAT

The paper could just as easily be "female faculty discriminate more than male faculty".

The **MALE** faculty want to hire more females

IMAGINE MY SHOCK

wot

Such good research @méep

you fucking plonker

all this shows is that females are less likely to be good at jobs

IF YOU'RE OWN GROUP IS DISCRIMINATING AGAINST YOU, that tells you something

it's not that they're not good at office work, it's that they're cancerous to a productive environment

^

period

all men = all good

all women = all shit

>We recruited faculty participants from Biology, Chemistry, and
>Physics departments at three public and three private large, geographically
>diverse research-intensive universities in the United States

mixed = unproductive

So this is what I think makes the study weak.

3 departments across 6 universities.

I don't know, it could be true, women are less likely to be hired as lab manager.

At least on those 6 universities, on those 3 departments.

But there's also the other story, that women discriminate more, also told, by accident, on the same study.

It just doesn't convince me there's a systematic discrimination. I would also like to see a similar study on Psychology and Psychiatry departments. Heck, do it across all departments of all universities you can afford, break it down by department if needed.

Also, let's keep in mind, the scales go from 1 to 7. The resume wasn't that great to begin with.

Hireability below 4, honestly, would be a "don't hire" recommendation. At least for me.

So we're talking about a candidate that would be almost universally rejected, only arguing about who got a worse failing grade.

huh

Hey look! A wild cuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uXsCaakZD8

>h3h3Productions
Disappointment

Heil mein fuhrer Ajit Pai

^

Pai is love pai is life

You know someone is a man of culture when they partake in the fidget spinner trend

Lol

Fucking /our guy/pai

Lol

Nice meme dan