https://www.change.org/p/justin-trudeau-nuke-africa?recruiter=826462657&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_page.share_redirect-control

everyone sign this petition

we can make a change

.agree

Is there a philosophy channel?

Fascism came to America when we started imperialism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJAYuHQZQ88

Call me crazy

but I think destiny is 100% right about the skeptics boxing above their weight

with the exception of Kraut, Sargon, Dr Layman, none of the "skeptics" offer anything other than shallow sjw-bashing.

contra points is pretty good

dm'd

I am a feminist

fite me

let the rationality flow through you

Someone come argue with me

im feminist now

got pink pilled

Is this really Sargon discord

Wow

alt right af

ur a racist buddy

Yep

just Came to argue

i figure rational skeptics will appreciate the challenge

Im a feminist libertarian

Fight me

>kraut irl rn

Me or kraut

anyone actually have good arguments against feminism?

you must prove all these bad things you listed are the fault of feminism

the *burden* is on you

if you have a specific claim you want to investigate

go for it

its not tho

lol you can't just say anything you want is feminism

"lol hitler was feminisms fault guys"

"that isn't feminism"

i can daniel

I am

the burden is on you to prove it is feminism

lol feminism is just support for equal rights for women

that is what it is as an ideology

@DanielKO those are just examples of bad feminists

I condemn those people?

prove this is something "feminists" want

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/feminism

i provided a definition

I don't make that argument daniel

don't strawman me daniel.

no true scotsman doesn't mean what you think it means.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

I have qualified "feminism" as the same thing throughout this discussion

therefore: no true no true scotsman

yes

sure

however: women are systematically disadvantaged in american society

k

so they can send 2 identical resumes

@Durtle02 the burden would be on you to prove most feminists disagree with me i guess, I don't really care what "most people" think

@DanielKO nope, I am in favor of everyone acknowledging their biases, then it won't be a problem

In their study, Moss-Racusin and her colleagues created a fictitious resume of an applicant for a lab manager position. Two versions of the resume were produced that varied in only one, very significant, detail: the name at the top. One applicant was named Jennifer and the other John. Moss-Racusin and her colleagues then asked STEM professors from across the country to assess the resume. Over one hundred biologists, chemists, and physicists at academic institutions agreed to do so. Each scientist was randomly assigned to review either Jennifer or John's resume.

Woman working at Argonne Labs
Woman working at Argonne Labs (Source: Argonne, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The results were surprising—they show that the decision makers did not evaluate the resume purely on its merits. Despite having the exact same qualifications and experience as John, Jennifer was perceived as significantly less competent. As a result, Jenifer experienced a number of disadvantages that would have hindered her career advancement if she were a real applicant. Because they perceived the female candidate as less competent, the scientists in the study were less willing to mentor Jennifer or to hire her as a lab manager. They also recommended paying her a lower salary. Jennifer was offered, on average, $4,000 per year (13%) less than John.
http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2014/why-does-john-get-stem-job-rather-jennifer

@franti gender biases undoubtedly oppress everyone of all genders.

@meratrix did you read the quote you retard

they had a sample size of 100+

@DanielKO australian government already was hiring women for falsely inflated reasons

vagina hiring points aren't good

I'm not a fan

everyone should just become educated to remove their biases

@DanielKO because I want to fix gender discrimination

of which I have provided a yet to be refuted source that it exists

@meratrix individual quirks are factored out when you account for sample size dipshit

you wouldn't see replicable trends if it was just human error

@meratrix but they gave individual resumes to a multitude of people mowron

@franti I don't know about eastern europe

@meratrix individual human error is factored out when you repeat the process multiple times

this is science class 5th grade

kill yourself firweaver

no u

gastheweebs.com

@Kunarian just registered as a liberalist

@JDM_WAAAT don't spam