so a more appropriate word is probably retarded

You cannot explain things that you think are basic

so who is at fault here 😄

I am giving up

Either you don't understand them very well, or you are talking bollox

There is a third option

@Deleted User there isn't if you are arguing in good will, in which you aren't

all of you guys are autistic niggers

@Deleted User I am white

Good will would imply to address the points given

no u

which you have not

No u

@Deleted User As I said when your re-iterated your argument. That the premise was bollox.

That is not an argument

Yes it is

define `bollox`

@Deleted User I will

https://i.imgur.com/Pjw8VqV.png

In this case he tried to say that violence was equivalent to politcal pressure of a particular group

violence is physical

Showing you do not understand my argument again

political pressure might include violence but it doesn't have to

therefore bollox

@Deleted User I don't think you understand your own argument

You cannot define terms

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

Apparently non-violence === violence

——————>

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

LOL

Top Intellectual we got here

@Deleted User I am a programmer mate.

Lol that does not make you an intellectual

That means you’re autistic mate

Or that you have the ability to understand basic concepts

Only the most autistic people, code

@Deleted User I didn't say it did. I said I use logic, not bullshit

"LoGIc"

@Deleted User what basic concepts, there hasn't been one

The ability to read

@Deleted User Not really, Austistic people aren't great programmers.

When did he ever say that non-violence is violence?

@Deleted User I mean about your treatise, that political will equals violence

@Deleted User he was making an equivalence of violence to a political will of a group

your statement shows you didn't comprehend what i wrote

So he never said that “non-violence is violence” then

"9:08 PM] Paul Atreides: If you are attempting to pose you political will on someone
[9:08 PM] Paul Atreides: through inherently nonviolent means
[9:08 PM] Luke: TOTAL BOLLOX
[9:08 PM] Paul Atreides: You are using a form of masked violence"

Nothing from that shows what you wrote

It means that you don't see a big difference between actual violence and normal politics

War=War is a violent struggle between two hostile,
independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself
on the other. War is fundamentally an interactive social
process.
Natural state of things=Total war and perfect peace rarely exist in practice. Instead,
they are extremes between which exist the relations among
most political groups.
So
If you are attempting to pose you political will on someone
through inherently nonviolent means You are using a form of masked violence

you can quote it again

War=War is a violent struggle between two hostile,
independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself
on the other. War is fundamentally an interactive social
process.
Natural state of things=Total war and perfect peace rarely exist in practice. Instead,
they are extremes between which exist the relations among
most political groups.
So
If you are attempting to pose you political will on someone
through inherently nonviolent means You are using a form of masked violence

but the important bit is what I quoted

taking things out of their total context <:GWragFeelsComfyMan:390321740158468096>

What is masked violence, and thus why I asked otherwise it just means nothing.

WAR!

WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR?

WAR "WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR!!!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX7V6FAoTLc

Fuck you leaf

No u

ayyyyyyyy

@Deleted User I didn't take it out of context. Fuck off.

Muh reduction

translation

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

No

I've asked you to define "masked violence"

you haven't provided me with anything except your paragraphs of crap

and then say "you haven't read it"

FUCK OFF

I mean

I'd assume it'd be violence

while wearing masks

Same here

But apparently it isn't

What level of quantum autism are we on today folks

have we hit "words mean different things to the two arguing so this is never gonna get anywhere"

because that's the most frustrating tier

https://news.sky.com/story/memes-will-be-banned-under-new-eu-copyright-law-warn-campaigners-11398577

THE MEME WAR IS UPON US!

IT IS TIME TO WEAPONIZE OUR AUTISM ONCE AGAIN!

EU edition

What even are rampant Muslim rape gangs? Nah mon ami, we have to ban the memes. Hon hon hon......

<:zucc:433402362447527936>

*steiner intensifies*

<:pepe_smile:378719407977005068>

yes those fucking chinese rapists

something something small dick joke

Fucking gooks at it again

They said I was crazy when I proposed we gas the chinks....WHO'S CRAZY NOW HUH?!

u

nah

thats pakistan

That's proof that Imperialism didn't go far enough

I mean

We could have saved those poor savages

you can justifiably chunk asia into