I have had no point readdressed

I did address all of them, but saying I didn't is easier for you I guess.

You asked me if i watched a gay movie

and said a sentence was bollox

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

You lost the argument when you called me austistic

You just seem like you cannot understand basic things

so a more appropriate word is probably retarded

You cannot explain things that you think are basic

so who is at fault here 😄

I am giving up

Either you don't understand them very well, or you are talking bollox

There is a third option

@Deleted User there isn't if you are arguing in good will, in which you aren't

all of you guys are autistic niggers

@Deleted User I am white

Good will would imply to address the points given

no u

which you have not

No u

@Deleted User As I said when your re-iterated your argument. That the premise was bollox.

That is not an argument

Yes it is

define `bollox`

@Deleted User I will

https://i.imgur.com/Pjw8VqV.png

In this case he tried to say that violence was equivalent to politcal pressure of a particular group

violence is physical

Showing you do not understand my argument again

political pressure might include violence but it doesn't have to

therefore bollox

@Deleted User I don't think you understand your own argument

You cannot define terms

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

Apparently non-violence === violence

——————>

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

LOL

Top Intellectual we got here

@Deleted User I am a programmer mate.

Lol that does not make you an intellectual

That means you’re autistic mate