@Deleted User I don't think you understand your own argument

You cannot define terms

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

Apparently non-violence === violence

——————>

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

LOL

Top Intellectual we got here

@Deleted User I am a programmer mate.

Lol that does not make you an intellectual

That means you’re autistic mate

Or that you have the ability to understand basic concepts

Only the most autistic people, code

@Deleted User I didn't say it did. I said I use logic, not bullshit

"LoGIc"

@Deleted User what basic concepts, there hasn't been one

The ability to read

@Deleted User Not really, Austistic people aren't great programmers.

When did he ever say that non-violence is violence?

@Deleted User I mean about your treatise, that political will equals violence

@Deleted User he was making an equivalence of violence to a political will of a group

your statement shows you didn't comprehend what i wrote

So he never said that “non-violence is violence” then

"9:08 PM] Paul Atreides: If you are attempting to pose you political will on someone
[9:08 PM] Paul Atreides: through inherently nonviolent means
[9:08 PM] Luke: TOTAL BOLLOX
[9:08 PM] Paul Atreides: You are using a form of masked violence"

Nothing from that shows what you wrote

It means that you don't see a big difference between actual violence and normal politics

War=War is a violent struggle between two hostile,
independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself
on the other. War is fundamentally an interactive social
process.
Natural state of things=Total war and perfect peace rarely exist in practice. Instead,
they are extremes between which exist the relations among
most political groups.
So
If you are attempting to pose you political will on someone
through inherently nonviolent means You are using a form of masked violence

you can quote it again

War=War is a violent struggle between two hostile,
independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself
on the other. War is fundamentally an interactive social
process.
Natural state of things=Total war and perfect peace rarely exist in practice. Instead,
they are extremes between which exist the relations among
most political groups.
So
If you are attempting to pose you political will on someone
through inherently nonviolent means You are using a form of masked violence

but the important bit is what I quoted

taking things out of their total context <:GWragFeelsComfyMan:390321740158468096>

What is masked violence, and thus why I asked otherwise it just means nothing.

WAR!

WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR?

WAR "WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR!!!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX7V6FAoTLc

Fuck you leaf

No u

ayyyyyyyy

@Deleted User I didn't take it out of context. Fuck off.

Muh reduction

translation