Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 455104763076542475
There is a third option
@Deleted User there isn't if you are arguing in good will, in which you aren't
all of you guys are autistic niggers
@Deleted User I am white
Good will would imply to address the points given
no u
which you have not
No u
@Deleted User As I said when your re-iterated your argument. That the premise was bollox.
That is not an argument
Yes it is
define `bollox`
@Deleted User I will
In this case he tried to say that violence was equivalent to politcal pressure of a particular group
violence is physical
Showing you do not understand my argument again
political pressure might include violence but it doesn't have to
therefore bollox
@Deleted User I don't think you understand your own argument
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
Apparently non-violence === violence
——————>
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
LOL
Top Intellectual we got here
@Deleted User I am a programmer mate.
Lol that does not make you an intellectual
That means you’re autistic mate
Or that you have the ability to understand basic concepts
Only the most autistic people, code
@Deleted User I didn't say it did. I said I use logic, not bullshit
"LoGIc"
@Deleted User what basic concepts, there hasn't been one
The ability to read
@Deleted User Not really, Austistic people aren't great programmers.
When did he ever say that non-violence is violence?
@Deleted User I mean about your treatise, that political will equals violence
@Deleted User he was making an equivalence of violence to a political will of a group
your statement shows you didn't comprehend what i wrote
So he never said that “non-violence is violence” then