Doo shotokan karate.

anyone into "good sportsmanship" I dislike

Fun as hell

all the components of MMA (muay Thai, boxing, wrestling, bjj, shotokan) have developed good movement specific training

I already am mostly a striker, I need ground spergs

Mma's problem is it forbids techniques.

And too much emphasis on ground game.

I need gay mixed race men in asian pajamas to roll around on the floor with me

Less on grabs.

well, that's UFC, not mixed martial arts as a broad concept

a guy who does wing chun and aikido is technically a mixed martial artist

technically, but that's not how MMA is colloquially used

MMA is typically muay thai + BJJ under UFC Inc's rules

I mean it in the old fashioned Pancrase sense

yes but so much more wrestling making its way in now

greco roman seems like it was specifically designed to be a ground & pound system

and ye olde english style catch wrestling.

I think it's funny that euro martial arts do great in MMA

people forget that boxing and wrestling are just euro martial arts

boxing + catch wrestling beats the hell out of asian stuff

I just wish there was a good euro kicking system (and savate doesn't count)

I've heard this before about catch wrestling

apparently both Lincoln and Washington were both beastly wrestlers

"A notable match in 1914 was between two prime representatives of their respective crafts: the American catch wrestler Ad Santel was the World Light Heavyweight Champion in catch wrestling, while Tokugoro Ito, a 5th degree black belt in judo, claimed to be the World Judo Champion. Santel defeated Ito and proclaimed himself World Judo Champion."

lmao

if it's asian I tend to like chinese stuff better

the chinese have a style of sport wrestling that highly incentivizes clean takedowns

in action it's monstrous to watch

send vid

Whaddya hear whaddya say?

@@Mother you still kickin around ?

the new amerika article does a good job pointing out that people are not consumerist to one-up their hypothetical neighbors who they never talk to anyway, but that they are consumerists to avoid the urban nigger blight and all the rest of the low class

they want "good" neighborhoods and "good" schools so their kids will be safe and won't grow up knowing more about jenkem than how to hold a job

so in other words people are materialist because blacks exist, so they have to buy their way into elite neighborhoods where there are no blacks

if there were no blacks, the need for money in america would be greatly reduced

@diversity_is_racism if you openly admit in your article that socialism is dysgenic but subsidizing the incompetent to breed, why do you think russians are innately incompetent from the beginning rather than merely victims of the above?

I don't know what he will say but accepting an ideology like that would make you incompetent

socialism is not a person after all

what he said makes sense - the retards breed at the expense of the competent, who are taxed to death to support them, and as a result choose themselves to have few or no children because those kids would only have the horrible life they had, slaving away long hours chained by the deadweight of the untermensch

I think that's stupid

one thing I wonder how he'd address is what I have learned lately, that the rich have different temperaments and abilities, yes, but often their richness comes down to simply having information poor people do not

retards breeding at the expense of others is not even slightly sufficient to cause the others to breed less

having children is far too basic a drive

its only in our modern times it feels like that

eh

something unimportant or delayable

you're doing the thing where you argue with my point rather than hearing it out

not really in the mood

just responding to that previous thing you said

maybe I should just PM prozak instead

I'm just saying based on what you said, you don't have to respond to me, I'm not breaking down your arguments

What are you guys up to

people breeding at sub replacement levels is not something easily explainable, that's all I'm saying

@fallot I think it has more to do with the expensive of raising a child in the middle class

I don't know the exact figure, but I've heard $100,00+ thrown around in conversation before

that probably factors in, and maybe what Exilarch said factors in too

seems like a reasonable figure to me

but most people don't appreciate how abnormal and exceptional a behaviour it is

Half Of Detroit’s Candidates for Mayor Are Felons

That's it?

That city is so corrupt, I guarantee all of them have committed felonies in the past

Otherwise their political careers wouldn't have made it that far

why does it cost 100k for a kid

Food

Education

Long term investment

Invest in genes

education?

college

college is for poor people

Nowadays

no, it always was

not really

not at all

what do you mean always

college is a factory to generate skilled employees for rich people to buy and boss around

Dont agree with always

That's dumb

yeah

of course you think it's dumb

Have you ever been to a university

no, it just is dumb

I am finishing a doctorate

I think it's dumb because it's untrue

What ia dumb

dont put us at the opposing side

of your idea

automatically

Education is never dumb unless the goal is to judt simply educate without purpose

education used to be for a very small section of the population

education does not presume college

of that level I mean

Ie shopping for career

there are many ways to become educated

college/university

Don't kid yourself

if you had said this was the case for the last 50 years

I don't think there would be a significant argument

Most informal education is beyond shit

a kid doesn't cost 100k unless you are wasting a lot of fucking money on bullshit

the most financially useful information I got, I got entirely for free

I don't agree with that @TendieLord

I agree with it

Well who has a kid here

most higher education really is worthless

I never said it wasn't

what do you mean by informal education

Teaching yourself a skill

I really do just speak one line and instantly polarize the place I'm in

I am a human wrecking ball

No

okay, I guess that's fair then

It's already polarized

with that definition

@Deleted User 57835c2c while true

that isn't because of your positions

but how you hold them

yes

it's because of who I am and how I operate

sure

nothing to be proud of

I agree with you entirely

yeah you come off as a smarmy cunt

I don't like you

I don't think I can be any other way so I may as well have fun with it

he's not so bad

maybe prozak was smart after all to keep me out of his inner circle and away from his true ideas

I think you can be another way, but I could be wrong

Can I gas the jews?

fine Joe

feel free

make it quick pls

Of course

Daddy joe is on the case

what do you have against jews anyway

Urm

why don't you gas your own people under 100 IQ

Everything?

that would be half the population @Deleted User 57835c2c

good

just saying

or just force sterilize them

that way they can live and work and yadda yadda but the next gen will be better

I'm not so sure

likely to have significant unforeseen knock-on effects

You're basically eliminating the entire working class

Or just gas jews?

the problem people are high IQ

realistically I'd want a gradual "sterilize the worst N% every year" with a precisely calculated N

You think 100+ IQ people are going to want to do menial labor for shit pay?

the ones who cause the most problems

western society was already eugenic

to be honest I kind of admire jews for figuring out that if they are wandering Others, they didn't need laborers

@Deleted User 57835c2c That doesn't sound like a sustainable system

in a natural and sustainable way

realistically a morlock/eloi system would need to be developed

We could just gas jews tho

what do you have against the jews

they're Jewish

Yarp

I propose separating everyone out by whose skin is lighter vs darker than cardboard, and sterilizing the worst of the lighter ones and the best of the darker ones

until over generations they are two species

are you an INTJ @TendieLord

no

close

P?

a retarded servile creature vs natural overlords

I think the MBTI system is bullshit though

yes

You know the fact that the Jews own like 90% of property in America and Europe

They also run all the major tv networks in the west

everyone tends to think its bullshit

how'd you guess

you sound like it

Isn't Big 5 much more reliable

how

no see

man, pet peeve

And spread pro Israel and anti right wing propaganda

Big 5 is completely worthless, it doesn't tell you anything really about a person

all it is is reproducible

I'm pretty sure the Big 5 is standard in the psychological community.

it is

That's extremely important

not at all

yes

The results of the test ought to be reproduceable

How else would you determine the reliability of a given result?

its a good criterion, but what comes first is if its true/right and if its useful

But you don't know if it's true

If it isn't reproduceable

statistical reproducibility is not the bar for truth

That's the point of administering the test, to assess personality

otherwise a lot of stuff would be wrong

personality is inherently a subjective thing

its actually very impressive that considering the crap tests

and people's changing moods etc.

it still gets to like 70%

A test that isn't reproduceable isn't worth using

depends what you are talking about

In this instance

The instance of personality tests.

in this instance, reproducibility would be nice

all the lack of it really tells you is the tests are shit

not that MBTI is shit

if you decide MBTI is shit because the tests are shit

Didn't you just say that MBTI isn't reproduceable

you've not really given it a fair chance

or has poor reproduceability

it's like 70% reproducible

not scientific or objective

exactly

so it sucks

I'm not going to be able to impress this on you I think

My results aren't guaranteed to reflect objective reality

reproducibility is not objective reality

as personality is subjective

a person can have 1 type, but answer differently

depending on various factors

not all of which can be accounted for

I took one and it says I am extraverted

which is true yet false

this problem comes up in medicine a lot

I see what you're saying

a lot of stuff is tested to be just great, very useful

but has no clinical significance once actually put into practice

partly that's just bad faith testing

correct would be:
Extremely open to new experience
Highly conscientious
Extremes of introversion and extraversion depending on the day
Not agreeable at all
High neuroticism

and a lot of stuff done in medicine does not have good ("A") evidence

5 disparate things that come together into nothing at all, I've always found

what five things

the ones @Deleted User 57835c2c just said

its his big 5

what do you mean by "come together into nothing at all"

that they're orthogonal?

you cannot derive anything from it, new knowledge, it doesn't tell you anything about the person beyond the sum of the parts tested

whereas an MBTI profile tells you a lot

you can predict their responses to specific scenarios based on that information

that's helpful

like even your skepticism for this stuff

fits with your type

yeah, but when you predict

I don't doubt that MBTI can make solid analyses of personality

you're just using the result itself

you're not getting a holistic picture out of it that tells you about how that person thinks

what they may value, and how

why not

sure sounds like it

I dont understand the question

*you're not getting a holistic picture out of it that tells you about how that person thinks*

you can tell they are introverted if they score high on introversion