Message from @fallot

Discord ID: 342835350479044609


2017-08-04 01:03:27 UTC  

everyone tends to think its bullshit

2017-08-04 01:03:29 UTC  

how'd you guess

2017-08-04 01:03:37 UTC  

you sound like it

2017-08-04 01:03:39 UTC  

Isn't Big 5 much more reliable

2017-08-04 01:03:41 UTC  

how

2017-08-04 01:03:43 UTC  

no see

2017-08-04 01:03:48 UTC  

man, pet peeve

2017-08-04 01:03:58 UTC  

And spread pro Israel and anti right wing propaganda

2017-08-04 01:03:59 UTC  

Big 5 is completely worthless, it doesn't tell you anything really about a person

2017-08-04 01:04:04 UTC  

all it is is reproducible

2017-08-04 01:04:09 UTC  

I'm pretty sure the Big 5 is standard in the psychological community.

2017-08-04 01:04:12 UTC  

it is

2017-08-04 01:04:15 UTC  

That's extremely important

2017-08-04 01:04:20 UTC  

not at all

2017-08-04 01:04:22 UTC  

yes

2017-08-04 01:04:32 UTC  

The results of the test ought to be reproduceable

2017-08-04 01:04:50 UTC  

How else would you determine the reliability of a given result?

2017-08-04 01:04:53 UTC  

its a good criterion, but what comes first is if its true/right and if its useful

2017-08-04 01:05:02 UTC  

But you don't know if it's true

2017-08-04 01:05:09 UTC  

If it isn't reproduceable

2017-08-04 01:05:17 UTC  

statistical reproducibility is not the bar for truth

2017-08-04 01:05:20 UTC  

That's the point of administering the test, to assess personality

2017-08-04 01:05:22 UTC  

otherwise a lot of stuff would be wrong

2017-08-04 01:05:30 UTC  

personality is inherently a subjective thing

2017-08-04 01:05:55 UTC  

its actually very impressive that considering the crap tests

2017-08-04 01:05:59 UTC  

and people's changing moods etc.

2017-08-04 01:06:03 UTC  

it still gets to like 70%

2017-08-04 01:06:07 UTC  

A test that isn't reproduceable isn't worth using

2017-08-04 01:06:19 UTC  

depends what you are talking about

2017-08-04 01:06:32 UTC  

In this instance

2017-08-04 01:06:40 UTC  

The instance of personality tests.

2017-08-04 01:06:51 UTC  

in this instance, reproducibility would be nice

2017-08-04 01:07:00 UTC  

all the lack of it really tells you is the tests are shit

2017-08-04 01:07:05 UTC  

not that MBTI is shit

2017-08-04 01:07:13 UTC  

if you decide MBTI is shit because the tests are shit

2017-08-04 01:07:18 UTC  

Didn't you just say that MBTI isn't reproduceable

2017-08-04 01:07:22 UTC  

you've not really given it a fair chance

2017-08-04 01:07:27 UTC  

or has poor reproduceability

2017-08-04 01:07:31 UTC  

it's like 70% reproducible

2017-08-04 01:07:35 UTC  

not scientific or objective

2017-08-04 01:07:44 UTC  

exactly