general
Discord ID: 267086373285134338
257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 429/1029
| Next
I respectfully think most of the scientific community disagrees
But you're free to your opinion
More data is not necessarily more possibility for deviation
But it is
In an assumption
That's simply fact
Not at all
Maybe you get lucky and what you study has a narrow spread
That's not about possibility
you're giving a specific example
More 'resolution' in a wide field
Doesnt help you
When you have no framework for the field
The framework comes first
That's very generalized
my point still stands though
Its a general discussion no
The more data you have, the more possibility for variation, compared to less data.
that's a very basic concept
Huh?
I thought you said more deviation from an imagined pattern
Not more variation
More variation helps my argument surely
If I flip a coin one time, I will likely never have the variation that I will find if I flip it 10 times.
But if you toss it 100,000 times
You wont be better off if you do it 10 mil
"Actually it would give you less ability to construct viable statisticial models because it allots for more variation"
is what I said
No?
No?
You deny me saying that?
I literally copy and pasted
I deny it being correct
If you toss a coin 100,000 times you're going to have more accuracy in your conclusion than if you do it 10 times under the same conditions
More variation equals more best fit models
Not less
you could flip 7 heads and 3 tails by chance
No. You wont simply. That is in principle incorrect.
with 100,000 flips you won't get 70 percent heads
And gets to the heart of my discussion
with 10 it's still significantly possible
Yeah. You need enough.
More is not better
My whole argument
You believe it's impossible to get 7 heads in a coin toss of 10 times?
I think most people would disagree
even if its not likely
it's still quite possible
Again. I said enough. Is 10 flips enough in principle to establish a certain premise about coinflips? No.
But 100k is
And more wont help
100k is more than 10
100k helped compared to 10
hence proving my point
Come on man
What?
This is really basic stuff
My point is what?
I'm not trying to knock you
Yes. Basic and irrelevant
It's not irrelevant
It's quite important
You're acting as if sample size doesn't matter
that's clearly not the case
It matters to a point
It matters period
Depends on what you study
No. It doesnt matter period.
Yes, we only have so many resources to expend on it
Per the 100k vs. 10 mil example
But it's important to get a large sample size
Maybe. It certainly isnt some inviolable principle. Maybe it is useful.
10 mil will still give you a more accurate result than 100k
It doesnt make it MORE TRUE
10 mil vs. 100k in coinflips
It's not about being "more true" but more accurate
Will not give you a more accurate result
it will
More accurate what though
Than what you'd likely otherwise get just doing 100k
in other words
Hang on
sure thing
100k fully establishes a certain premise
it does
and that premise is valid
How can you get more accurate than 50 50
why do you assume you'll get a perfect 50/50 at 100k?
Will it become 50.0n1 on one side?
You likely won't
but you'll get close
You will.
and you'll get closer at 10 mil
Why stop at 10 mil
You believe someone will always flip exactly 50k of their 100k flips on heads every time they attempt it?
Go for broke
you can stop at whenever you want
10 mil study under the same circumstances will be appreciated more than the 100k
and there's valid reason for it
No. But you can nevertheless extract the trend at 100k. 10 mil helps you not one bit.
Not even a little bit
Well it gets you a more accurate result
Its ridiculous you think so
Whether you think it's accurate enough is subjective
This is exactly what I meant
I'd certainly trust a 10k study over 10, and a 10mil study over 10k, though with all things being equal
statistics are ridiculous?
Obv not as stats is stats at 100k or 10 mil.
Stats is not amounts
well, again you're free to think what you want
Yes, we all have budget and time constraints
I'm simply stating what's commonly known and accepted
Its about principles, that is my point
What is commonly known and accepted is frankly bullshit
But okay fine
Its a dead end
I respectfully disagree in relation to this topic
Thanks for the discussion
anytime
same to you
here you go @Jossi a somewhat history related post http://atavisionary.com/pirates/
I agree ata. Shits a mess. And no most pirates I've read about weren't ass rangers. ๐
Also, @diversity_is_racism have some hungarian metal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I27NA7Wyj4g
I mean fucking hell nigger loving faggot pirate?
The fuckers have some audacity to shove that shit up the anus of history. But they are marxist faggots so of course they are going to try
Apparently this is what the frogs have underneath their Eiffel Tower since a while now. https://creators.vice.com/en_uk/article/first-mural-ever-painted-beneath-eiffel-tower
Some more from the same artist
Morlocks?
Interracial orgy with Morlocks, yes
It's not racial
It's dualistic/occult
Almost all of his work are Black creatures killing the White ones
Evil triumphs
my balls itch
SODOMIZE
THE WEAK
what is the cure for itchy balls
a wet mouth
WHY IS HE SCREAMING
Heil
Hey
Howdy
But consider that gays represent perhaps 10% of the country, and that was enough to change laws.
how the hell does even Mr. Dilbert fall for this shit
no way are gay people 10% of the population
someone thankfully corrects in the comments with <4%
there are more than 10% faggots but not all of them are gay
granted
I trolled the hell out of some vegans today on reddit. it was quite fun. They get very butthurt
http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/05/09/opinion/french-election-scandal-traced-canadas-rebel-media heres some fake news, enjoy (read caption under picture of milo)
I thought most of the media found out that it is a ''fake hatesymbol'' whatever that means
the media already knew it isnt a hate symbol
You can look up this chicks other articles, it's a top-down coordinated campaign
like it is across other media outlets
milos head looks photoshopped
saying that it is is going too far its probably just the direction hes looking
it doesnt look natural
MILO DID RUSSIA
white shariah now
WHITE IDENTITIES NOW
aesthetic tip of a day
if you dont need them wheels
swap your ugly computer chair with a normal chair
you can ven buy a fancy working desk char, improves the room aesthetics substantially
computer chairs are quite ugly in a subtle way
THEY ARE KIND OF UGLY
WHEELS ARE OF LIMITED UTILITY UNLESS SPACE IS TIGHT
HOWDY @Deleted User 57835c2c
who gives a fuck if the chair is ugly if the person sitting on the chair is not already physically perfect
I AGREE WITH @The Enlightened Shepherd ON ANOTHER LEVEL AS WELL
REMOVE UGLINESS
PERFECTION IS AN ONGOING GOAL
WE NEED HEALTH AND PURPOSE
if the person on the chair does not have a ripped sixpack and visible muscle mass then the chair is a silly detail to even care about
WE WILL WORK TOWARD PERFECTION OVER THE AGES
IT STARTS WITH REMOVAL OF ALL APPLE PRODUCTS
I don't know why anybody even cares what clothes they wear if they are not already maximally fit and with great hair
and skin
DETAIL => E-DALIT
for some reason i am reading this with a robot voice
MOST PEOPLE HAVE NEVER BEEN PERFECT
AND
THERE IS MUCH TO DO INSIDE THE MIND AND SOUL FIRST
@Jossi @Deleted User 57835c2c @The Enlightened Shepherd @atavisionary THE ABOVE LINK IS RELEVANT TO YOUR PURSUITS AS WELL
@Deleted User 57835c2c CONSIDER THE IMPERFECTION OF THE THOUGHT-DISCIPLINE OF MOST PEOPLE
THAT MAKES THE FIRST CUT IN CASTE
AFTER THAT, WE NEED A STRONG GOAL
CLASSIC WESTERN BEAUTY AND HEALTH
PEOPLE CAN WORK TOWARD THAT
BUT ONLY IF FIRST THE SPIRIT IS ALIGNED
How about classic western chairs?
WORKS BY ME
My tip about the chair was aimed at perfectionists
I agree with the mental/spiritual aspect
to me, there is mind/body/spirit/environment and less than perfect in any of them is unacceptable
I always notice little aesthetic shortcomings
Which is kind of unfortunate since every single building where i live is covered with external air conditioning devices
@diversity_is_racism will read
im doing3 things at the tme, mixing, watching a video of a dude ranting about windows 10 and reading
play videos on 1.25 to save time
I hate how millennials talk and write
do millennial germans and scandinavians have annoying linguistic habits too?
or is that just a retard american/anglophone thing?
you mean like saying like alot
@Angry German HAVENT HAD A PRO TIP LIKE THIS IN A WHILE
thanks
millenials have this high pitched squeal
fake emotions and gestures
notice they are all mixed race pieces of shit except the bleach blond dyke in the center
have malnutritioned faces
and talk 5 times more frequent than their thoughts
uptalk
sentence fragments
80% of thei words are a desire for external approval and affirmation of their current social position
since they are socialy very anxious
so if they stand on a street
they just cant stand there and do their waiting or whatever
I feel like I am the only millennial without social anxiety to any degree
they have to immediatelly check for approval if them standing in the street is OK
if they have no reason to be there, that means an excuse
then they enter an intense psychological drama
@Deleted User 57835c2c Most of the listed speaking habits can be applied to German millennials aswell
I know about those guys
They're lovely
They have fun while doing the god's work
varg has graduated from pan-europeanism to trolling wogs
evil invaders article is good
finally, an alt-righter with a god damn policy position
who is forrest
that's decent
that nordic youth stuff is good but they need a more middling group
Sweden needs the alt right
less anti-X, more pro-white
let anti-X be subtext
the need would be for recruitment as well as normie directed propaganda
they need to be hated like Nazis, and it needs to be obvious this smear is not justified
to induce the necessary dissonance
257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 429/1029
| Next