general

Discord ID: 267086373285134338


257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 429/1029 | Next

2017-05-09 05:36:31 UTC

I respectfully think most of the scientific community disagrees

2017-05-09 05:36:38 UTC

But you're free to your opinion

2017-05-09 05:36:44 UTC

More data is not necessarily more possibility for deviation

2017-05-09 05:36:54 UTC

But it is

2017-05-09 05:36:58 UTC

In an assumption

2017-05-09 05:37:02 UTC

That's simply fact

2017-05-09 05:37:04 UTC

Not at all

2017-05-09 05:37:20 UTC

Maybe you get lucky and what you study has a narrow spread

2017-05-09 05:37:36 UTC

That's not about possibility

2017-05-09 05:37:39 UTC

you're giving a specific example

2017-05-09 05:37:43 UTC

More 'resolution' in a wide field

2017-05-09 05:37:50 UTC

Doesnt help you

2017-05-09 05:37:59 UTC

When you have no framework for the field

2017-05-09 05:38:07 UTC

The framework comes first

2017-05-09 05:38:14 UTC

That's very generalized

2017-05-09 05:38:18 UTC

my point still stands though

2017-05-09 05:38:23 UTC

Its a general discussion no

2017-05-09 05:38:48 UTC

The more data you have, the more possibility for variation, compared to less data.

2017-05-09 05:39:14 UTC

that's a very basic concept

2017-05-09 05:39:25 UTC

Huh?

2017-05-09 05:39:43 UTC

I thought you said more deviation from an imagined pattern

2017-05-09 05:39:47 UTC

Not more variation

2017-05-09 05:39:59 UTC

More variation helps my argument surely

2017-05-09 05:40:12 UTC

If I flip a coin one time, I will likely never have the variation that I will find if I flip it 10 times.

2017-05-09 05:40:47 UTC

But if you toss it 100,000 times

2017-05-09 05:40:57 UTC

You wont be better off if you do it 10 mil

2017-05-09 05:41:08 UTC

"Actually it would give you less ability to construct viable statisticial models because it allots for more variation"

2017-05-09 05:41:14 UTC

is what I said

2017-05-09 05:41:33 UTC

No?

2017-05-09 05:41:43 UTC

No?

2017-05-09 05:41:47 UTC

You deny me saying that?

2017-05-09 05:41:52 UTC

I literally copy and pasted

2017-05-09 05:41:56 UTC

I deny it being correct

2017-05-09 05:42:26 UTC

If you toss a coin 100,000 times you're going to have more accuracy in your conclusion than if you do it 10 times under the same conditions

2017-05-09 05:42:27 UTC

More variation equals more best fit models

2017-05-09 05:42:29 UTC

Not less

2017-05-09 05:42:44 UTC

you could flip 7 heads and 3 tails by chance

2017-05-09 05:42:48 UTC

No. You wont simply. That is in principle incorrect.

2017-05-09 05:42:59 UTC

with 100,000 flips you won't get 70 percent heads

2017-05-09 05:43:03 UTC

And gets to the heart of my discussion

2017-05-09 05:43:11 UTC

with 10 it's still significantly possible

2017-05-09 05:43:12 UTC

Yeah. You need enough.

2017-05-09 05:43:26 UTC

More is not better

2017-05-09 05:43:30 UTC

My whole argument

2017-05-09 05:43:55 UTC

You believe it's impossible to get 7 heads in a coin toss of 10 times?

2017-05-09 05:44:04 UTC

I think most people would disagree

2017-05-09 05:44:10 UTC

even if its not likely

2017-05-09 05:44:17 UTC

it's still quite possible

2017-05-09 05:44:42 UTC

Again. I said enough. Is 10 flips enough in principle to establish a certain premise about coinflips? No.

2017-05-09 05:44:46 UTC

But 100k is

2017-05-09 05:44:51 UTC

And more wont help

2017-05-09 05:45:01 UTC

100k is more than 10

2017-05-09 05:45:06 UTC

100k helped compared to 10

2017-05-09 05:45:11 UTC

hence proving my point

2017-05-09 05:45:18 UTC

Come on man

2017-05-09 05:45:22 UTC

What?

2017-05-09 05:45:25 UTC

This is really basic stuff

2017-05-09 05:45:25 UTC

My point is what?

2017-05-09 05:45:30 UTC

I'm not trying to knock you

2017-05-09 05:45:36 UTC

Yes. Basic and irrelevant

2017-05-09 05:45:45 UTC

It's not irrelevant

2017-05-09 05:45:48 UTC

It's quite important

2017-05-09 05:46:12 UTC

You're acting as if sample size doesn't matter

2017-05-09 05:46:15 UTC

that's clearly not the case

2017-05-09 05:46:21 UTC

It matters to a point

2017-05-09 05:46:27 UTC

It matters period

2017-05-09 05:46:29 UTC

Depends on what you study

2017-05-09 05:46:36 UTC

No. It doesnt matter period.

2017-05-09 05:46:36 UTC

Yes, we only have so many resources to expend on it

2017-05-09 05:46:43 UTC

Per the 100k vs. 10 mil example

2017-05-09 05:46:49 UTC

But it's important to get a large sample size

2017-05-09 05:47:16 UTC

Maybe. It certainly isnt some inviolable principle. Maybe it is useful.

2017-05-09 05:47:22 UTC

10 mil will still give you a more accurate result than 100k

2017-05-09 05:47:25 UTC

It doesnt make it MORE TRUE

2017-05-09 05:47:47 UTC

10 mil vs. 100k in coinflips

2017-05-09 05:47:56 UTC

It's not about being "more true" but more accurate

2017-05-09 05:48:00 UTC

Will not give you a more accurate result

2017-05-09 05:48:06 UTC

it will

2017-05-09 05:48:19 UTC

More accurate what though

2017-05-09 05:48:38 UTC

Than what you'd likely otherwise get just doing 100k

2017-05-09 05:48:41 UTC

in other words

2017-05-09 05:48:53 UTC

Hang on

2017-05-09 05:49:00 UTC

sure thing

2017-05-09 05:49:03 UTC

100k fully establishes a certain premise

2017-05-09 05:49:07 UTC

it does

2017-05-09 05:49:10 UTC

and that premise is valid

2017-05-09 05:49:17 UTC

How can you get more accurate than 50 50

2017-05-09 05:49:29 UTC

why do you assume you'll get a perfect 50/50 at 100k?

2017-05-09 05:49:30 UTC

Will it become 50.0n1 on one side?

2017-05-09 05:49:37 UTC

You likely won't

2017-05-09 05:49:39 UTC

but you'll get close

2017-05-09 05:49:43 UTC

You will.

2017-05-09 05:49:46 UTC

and you'll get closer at 10 mil

2017-05-09 05:50:26 UTC

Why stop at 10 mil

2017-05-09 05:50:31 UTC

You believe someone will always flip exactly 50k of their 100k flips on heads every time they attempt it?

2017-05-09 05:50:34 UTC

Go for broke

2017-05-09 05:50:37 UTC

you can stop at whenever you want

2017-05-09 05:50:51 UTC

10 mil study under the same circumstances will be appreciated more than the 100k

2017-05-09 05:51:02 UTC

and there's valid reason for it

2017-05-09 05:51:14 UTC

No. But you can nevertheless extract the trend at 100k. 10 mil helps you not one bit.

2017-05-09 05:51:29 UTC

Not even a little bit

2017-05-09 05:51:33 UTC

Well it gets you a more accurate result

2017-05-09 05:51:37 UTC

Its ridiculous you think so

2017-05-09 05:51:42 UTC

Whether you think it's accurate enough is subjective

2017-05-09 05:51:44 UTC

This is exactly what I meant

2017-05-09 05:52:15 UTC

I'd certainly trust a 10k study over 10, and a 10mil study over 10k, though with all things being equal

2017-05-09 05:52:28 UTC

statistics are ridiculous?

2017-05-09 05:52:50 UTC

Obv not as stats is stats at 100k or 10 mil.

2017-05-09 05:52:54 UTC

Stats is not amounts

2017-05-09 05:53:41 UTC

well, again you're free to think what you want

2017-05-09 05:53:48 UTC

Yes, we all have budget and time constraints

2017-05-09 05:54:04 UTC

I'm simply stating what's commonly known and accepted

2017-05-09 05:54:06 UTC

Its about principles, that is my point

2017-05-09 05:54:26 UTC

What is commonly known and accepted is frankly bullshit

2017-05-09 05:54:32 UTC

But okay fine

2017-05-09 05:54:38 UTC

Its a dead end

2017-05-09 05:54:45 UTC

I respectfully disagree in relation to this topic

2017-05-09 05:54:46 UTC

Thanks for the discussion

2017-05-09 05:54:49 UTC

anytime

2017-05-09 05:54:50 UTC

same to you

2017-05-09 12:15:03 UTC

here you go @Jossi a somewhat history related post http://atavisionary.com/pirates/

2017-05-09 12:20:15 UTC

I agree ata. Shits a mess. And no most pirates I've read about weren't ass rangers. ๐Ÿ˜„

2017-05-09 12:20:38 UTC
2017-05-09 12:22:50 UTC

I mean fucking hell nigger loving faggot pirate?

2017-05-09 12:23:34 UTC

The fuckers have some audacity to shove that shit up the anus of history. But they are marxist faggots so of course they are going to try

2017-05-09 13:11:56 UTC

Apparently this is what the frogs have underneath their Eiffel Tower since a while now. https://creators.vice.com/en_uk/article/first-mural-ever-painted-beneath-eiffel-tower

2017-05-09 13:15:55 UTC

Some more from the same artist

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/267086373285134338/311491476506804224/Cleon_Peterson.PNG

2017-05-09 13:43:43 UTC

Morlocks?

2017-05-09 13:44:35 UTC

@fallot check that out ^

2017-05-09 13:44:47 UTC

Interracial orgy with Morlocks, yes

2017-05-09 13:44:56 UTC

It's not racial

2017-05-09 13:45:08 UTC

It's dualistic/occult

2017-05-09 13:46:15 UTC

Almost all of his work are Black creatures killing the White ones

2017-05-09 13:48:47 UTC

Evil triumphs

2017-05-09 14:22:59 UTC

my balls itch

2017-05-09 14:24:10 UTC

SODOMIZE

2017-05-09 14:24:12 UTC

THE WEAK

2017-05-09 14:25:13 UTC

what is the cure for itchy balls

2017-05-09 14:53:51 UTC

a wet mouth

2017-05-09 15:01:06 UTC

WHY IS HE SCREAMING

2017-05-09 15:54:24 UTC

Heil

2017-05-09 15:54:57 UTC

Hey

2017-05-09 15:56:08 UTC

Howdy

2017-05-09 16:03:12 UTC

But consider that gays represent perhaps 10% of the country, and that was enough to change laws.

2017-05-09 16:03:25 UTC

how the hell does even Mr. Dilbert fall for this shit

2017-05-09 16:03:32 UTC

no way are gay people 10% of the population

2017-05-09 16:04:52 UTC

someone thankfully corrects in the comments with <4%

2017-05-09 16:06:54 UTC

there are more than 10% faggots but not all of them are gay

2017-05-09 16:10:25 UTC

granted

2017-05-09 17:17:42 UTC

I trolled the hell out of some vegans today on reddit. it was quite fun. They get very butthurt

2017-05-09 18:16:28 UTC
2017-05-09 18:24:01 UTC

I thought most of the media found out that it is a ''fake hatesymbol'' whatever that means

2017-05-09 18:24:51 UTC

the media already knew it isnt a hate symbol

2017-05-09 18:25:14 UTC

You can look up this chicks other articles, it's a top-down coordinated campaign

2017-05-09 18:25:19 UTC

like it is across other media outlets

2017-05-09 18:27:10 UTC

milos head looks photoshopped

2017-05-09 18:27:35 UTC

saying that it is is going too far its probably just the direction hes looking

2017-05-09 18:27:41 UTC

it doesnt look natural

2017-05-09 22:22:13 UTC

MILO DID RUSSIA

2017-05-09 22:40:49 UTC

white shariah now

2017-05-09 23:04:16 UTC

WHITE IDENTITIES NOW

2017-05-09 23:26:43 UTC

aesthetic tip of a day

2017-05-09 23:26:49 UTC

if you dont need them wheels

2017-05-09 23:27:11 UTC

swap your ugly computer chair with a normal chair

2017-05-09 23:27:35 UTC

you can ven buy a fancy working desk char, improves the room aesthetics substantially

2017-05-09 23:27:56 UTC

computer chairs are quite ugly in a subtle way

2017-05-09 23:28:07 UTC

THEY ARE KIND OF UGLY

2017-05-09 23:28:16 UTC

WHEELS ARE OF LIMITED UTILITY UNLESS SPACE IS TIGHT

2017-05-09 23:28:26 UTC
2017-05-09 23:28:31 UTC

who gives a fuck if the chair is ugly if the person sitting on the chair is not already physically perfect

2017-05-09 23:28:37 UTC

I AGREE WITH @The Enlightened Shepherd ON ANOTHER LEVEL AS WELL

2017-05-09 23:28:40 UTC

REMOVE UGLINESS

2017-05-09 23:28:48 UTC

PERFECTION IS AN ONGOING GOAL

2017-05-09 23:28:52 UTC

WE NEED HEALTH AND PURPOSE

2017-05-09 23:29:02 UTC

if the person on the chair does not have a ripped sixpack and visible muscle mass then the chair is a silly detail to even care about

2017-05-09 23:29:02 UTC

WE WILL WORK TOWARD PERFECTION OVER THE AGES

2017-05-09 23:29:07 UTC

IT STARTS WITH REMOVAL OF ALL APPLE PRODUCTS

2017-05-09 23:29:14 UTC

I don't know why anybody even cares what clothes they wear if they are not already maximally fit and with great hair

2017-05-09 23:29:16 UTC

and skin

2017-05-09 23:29:20 UTC

DETAIL => E-DALIT

2017-05-09 23:29:32 UTC

for some reason i am reading this with a robot voice

2017-05-09 23:29:32 UTC

MOST PEOPLE HAVE NEVER BEEN PERFECT

2017-05-09 23:29:33 UTC

AND

2017-05-09 23:29:40 UTC

THERE IS MUCH TO DO INSIDE THE MIND AND SOUL FIRST

2017-05-09 23:30:51 UTC

@Jossi @Deleted User 57835c2c @The Enlightened Shepherd @atavisionary THE ABOVE LINK IS RELEVANT TO YOUR PURSUITS AS WELL

2017-05-09 23:31:05 UTC

@Deleted User 57835c2c CONSIDER THE IMPERFECTION OF THE THOUGHT-DISCIPLINE OF MOST PEOPLE

2017-05-09 23:31:10 UTC

THAT MAKES THE FIRST CUT IN CASTE

2017-05-09 23:31:14 UTC

AFTER THAT, WE NEED A STRONG GOAL

2017-05-09 23:31:19 UTC

CLASSIC WESTERN BEAUTY AND HEALTH

2017-05-09 23:31:29 UTC

PEOPLE CAN WORK TOWARD THAT

2017-05-09 23:31:34 UTC

BUT ONLY IF FIRST THE SPIRIT IS ALIGNED

2017-05-09 23:32:11 UTC

How about classic western chairs?

2017-05-09 23:33:36 UTC

WORKS BY ME

2017-05-09 23:34:08 UTC

My tip about the chair was aimed at perfectionists

2017-05-09 23:34:34 UTC

I agree with the mental/spiritual aspect

2017-05-09 23:34:48 UTC

to me, there is mind/body/spirit/environment and less than perfect in any of them is unacceptable

2017-05-09 23:34:48 UTC

I always notice little aesthetic shortcomings

2017-05-09 23:35:16 UTC

Which is kind of unfortunate since every single building where i live is covered with external air conditioning devices

2017-05-09 23:35:39 UTC
2017-05-09 23:35:54 UTC

im doing3 things at the tme, mixing, watching a video of a dude ranting about windows 10 and reading

2017-05-09 23:36:54 UTC

play videos on 1.25 to save time

2017-05-09 23:38:13 UTC

I hate how millennials talk and write

2017-05-09 23:38:33 UTC

do millennial germans and scandinavians have annoying linguistic habits too?

2017-05-09 23:38:42 UTC

or is that just a retard american/anglophone thing?

2017-05-09 23:38:43 UTC

you mean like saying like alot

2017-05-09 23:39:18 UTC

@Angry German HAVENT HAD A PRO TIP LIKE THIS IN A WHILE

2017-05-09 23:39:19 UTC

thanks

2017-05-09 23:39:51 UTC

millenials have this high pitched squeal

2017-05-09 23:39:55 UTC

fake emotions and gestures

2017-05-09 23:40:00 UTC

notice they are all mixed race pieces of shit except the bleach blond dyke in the center

2017-05-09 23:40:02 UTC

have malnutritioned faces

2017-05-09 23:40:20 UTC

and talk 5 times more frequent than their thoughts

2017-05-09 23:40:30 UTC

uptalk

2017-05-09 23:40:35 UTC

sentence fragments

2017-05-09 23:40:55 UTC

80% of thei words are a desire for external approval and affirmation of their current social position

2017-05-09 23:41:03 UTC

since they are socialy very anxious

2017-05-09 23:41:11 UTC

so if they stand on a street

2017-05-09 23:41:20 UTC

they just cant stand there and do their waiting or whatever

2017-05-09 23:41:29 UTC

I feel like I am the only millennial without social anxiety to any degree

2017-05-09 23:41:32 UTC

they have to immediatelly check for approval if them standing in the street is OK

2017-05-09 23:42:12 UTC

if they have no reason to be there, that means an excuse

2017-05-09 23:42:20 UTC

then they enter an intense psychological drama

2017-05-09 23:43:57 UTC

@Deleted User 57835c2c Most of the listed speaking habits can be applied to German millennials aswell

2017-05-09 23:44:30 UTC
2017-05-09 23:45:06 UTC

I know about those guys

2017-05-09 23:45:09 UTC

They're lovely

2017-05-09 23:45:24 UTC

They have fun while doing the god's work

2017-05-10 00:45:47 UTC

varg has graduated from pan-europeanism to trolling wogs

2017-05-10 03:35:52 UTC

evil invaders article is good

2017-05-10 03:37:21 UTC

finally, an alt-righter with a god damn policy position

2017-05-10 04:20:49 UTC

who is forrest

2017-05-10 04:21:55 UTC

that's decent

2017-05-10 09:51:02 UTC

that nordic youth stuff is good but they need a more middling group

2017-05-10 09:51:07 UTC

Sweden needs the alt right

2017-05-10 09:51:25 UTC

less anti-X, more pro-white

2017-05-10 09:51:38 UTC

let anti-X be subtext

2017-05-10 09:52:16 UTC

the need would be for recruitment as well as normie directed propaganda

2017-05-10 09:52:40 UTC

they need to be hated like Nazis, and it needs to be obvious this smear is not justified

2017-05-10 09:52:50 UTC

to induce the necessary dissonance

2017-05-10 09:53:59 UTC

Forrest is crow isn't it @devolved

257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 429/1029 | Next