Message from @MOS MAIORVM (AKA Sola)
Discord ID: 311377767448969217
You wont be better off if you do it 10 mil
"Actually it would give you less ability to construct viable statisticial models because it allots for more variation"
is what I said
No?
No?
You deny me saying that?
I literally copy and pasted
I deny it being correct
If you toss a coin 100,000 times you're going to have more accuracy in your conclusion than if you do it 10 times under the same conditions
More variation equals more best fit models
Not less
you could flip 7 heads and 3 tails by chance
No. You wont simply. That is in principle incorrect.
with 100,000 flips you won't get 70 percent heads
And gets to the heart of my discussion
with 10 it's still significantly possible
Yeah. You need enough.
More is not better
My whole argument
You believe it's impossible to get 7 heads in a coin toss of 10 times?
even if its not likely
it's still quite possible
Again. I said enough. Is 10 flips enough in principle to establish a certain premise about coinflips? No.
But 100k is
And more wont help
100k is more than 10
100k helped compared to 10
hence proving my point
Come on man
What?
This is really basic stuff
My point is what?
I'm not trying to knock you
Yes. Basic and irrelevant
It's not irrelevant
It's quite important
You're acting as if sample size doesn't matter
that's clearly not the case
It matters to a point
It matters period