not that I'm saying that's the case

They really so.

Obviously they want to read the other articles.

Sometimes.

I honestly, personally, don't even know what albums have been SMRed

Nobody does.

even though I read a few

Nobody keeps track

Not even me.

They're not worth remembering

the SMRs?

I agree

I'd they get resent a few months later

They might have two SMRs

few would notice

Or I downloaded it.

I think you could do them after 1 week even

and get away with it

But they're usually consistent

like McDonald's

Nah it's important to have the tag, the review, say what it is, and why it's bad if it's not intriscally bad

Intrinsically bad.

Then insult them.

To speculate on the reason why it is bad.

@Death Strike's Bat IF THE FUCKING CUCKS WANT TO SEND MONEY OR HELP OUT, THEN WE CARE ABOUT THEIR COMPLAINTS

OTHERWISE MORE ANGRY PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET, NO ONE CARES

Yes

As I said.

50 per batch

yes I think that's accurate, as the end result

in the end, no one will care

you can look at it this way, or you can look at complaints as people who care speaking out

this isn't a mass appeal phenomenon

It will get you more Joy than Snapchat stock.

it's better to build your brand and play the long game

that's what gave ANUS its legs

hell, DMU is just riding that legacy

I mean, I'm here for that reason

all these metal people are

It could be a bit of both perhaps

The SMRs build the brand.

The problem with anus layout

I think that halfway effort has been tried

and has demonstrably failed

Was the sidebar reviews disappeared

an argument can be made that there is no metal to keep the old DLA like show going

There hasn't been any for most of the dla's existence

I can see the value of streamlining approaches though I definitely enjoyed the deeper articles too

yeah

there hasn't

Since 1994-95

I agree, I would disagree with that argument

The stream of good albums is about the same.

nah

Except for around 2003-2010

all the old material needed to be covered

It's just way more underground now.

I think more of the focus should be on the times when metal was actually good

rather than reviewing trash releases

1997 u have like 5 worthy albuns

meaningless

reviewing ONE halfway good release

is a great credit and benefit to many

And only one of them is as good as 1993

much better than shitting on obvious turds from high up

The shitting on the turds was always done.

nope

You just don't remember it

As it wasn't on the site forever

it doesn't matter

Or kept to forums

I've seen it all

it was never like thi

s

Well it was different in the past

If you don't want to see what is bad you can pay.

I remember that much

hey I've already stopped reading

I was just speaking for that comment a bit

Though I'll admit things change

Otherwise you will get 15 reviews a year.

I'd rather read Amerika

that sounds good!

15 reviews a year sounds good

If you pay

As the work to get you those reviews must still be done.

Everything is always changing

Metal will get deep again

I would pay if you can guarantee a DLA quality review of a DLA quality release

your end

For now it's just upholding a baseline

If you are willing to get 20 people to pay us 100 per person per year minimum, the DLA could be a zine.

But I'm not wholly invested tbh

100 in profit.

subscribe to DMU gold, Dan will suck your dick while singing napalm death songs

Ideally 100 people paying 100 a year.

Aye

@diversity_is_racism do you have the old Heidenlarm zines stored anywhere?

Which would be a zine of 150 pages or so on the best albums.