Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 292372052084654080
The stream of good albums is about the same.
nah
Except for around 2003-2010
all the old material needed to be covered
It's just way more underground now.
I think more of the focus should be on the times when metal was actually good
rather than reviewing trash releases
1997 u have like 5 worthy albuns
meaningless
reviewing ONE halfway good release
is a great credit and benefit to many
And only one of them is as good as 1993
much better than shitting on obvious turds from high up
The shitting on the turds was always done.
nope
You just don't remember it
As it wasn't on the site forever
it doesn't matter
Or kept to forums
I've seen it all
s
Well it was different in the past
If you don't want to see what is bad you can pay.
I remember that much
hey I've already stopped reading
I was just speaking for that comment a bit
Though I'll admit things change
Otherwise you will get 15 reviews a year.
I'd rather read Amerika
that sounds good!
15 reviews a year sounds good
If you pay
As the work to get you those reviews must still be done.
Everything is always changing
Metal will get deep again
I would pay if you can guarantee a DLA quality review of a DLA quality release
your end
For now it's just upholding a baseline
If you are willing to get 20 people to pay us 100 per person per year minimum, the DLA could be a zine.
But I'm not wholly invested tbh