I think more of the focus should be on the times when metal was actually good

rather than reviewing trash releases

1997 u have like 5 worthy albuns

meaningless

reviewing ONE halfway good release

is a great credit and benefit to many

And only one of them is as good as 1993

much better than shitting on obvious turds from high up

The shitting on the turds was always done.

nope

You just don't remember it

As it wasn't on the site forever

it doesn't matter

Or kept to forums

I've seen it all

it was never like thi

s

Well it was different in the past

If you don't want to see what is bad you can pay.

I remember that much

hey I've already stopped reading

I was just speaking for that comment a bit

Though I'll admit things change

Otherwise you will get 15 reviews a year.

I'd rather read Amerika

that sounds good!

15 reviews a year sounds good

If you pay

As the work to get you those reviews must still be done.

Everything is always changing

Metal will get deep again

I would pay if you can guarantee a DLA quality review of a DLA quality release

your end

For now it's just upholding a baseline

If you are willing to get 20 people to pay us 100 per person per year minimum, the DLA could be a zine.

But I'm not wholly invested tbh

100 in profit.

subscribe to DMU gold, Dan will suck your dick while singing napalm death songs

Ideally 100 people paying 100 a year.

Aye

@diversity_is_racism do you have the old Heidenlarm zines stored anywhere?