he went to franco

GIVE WEALTH TO THE SANE

had nothing to buy anything with

HAVE LEADERSHIP NOT GOVERNMENT

except for gold fillings

HAHA

and counterfeit currency

SICK

HITLER FIXED KEYNESIANISM

ranted at franco for over 30 hours straight

STILL VERY SOCIALIST

got nothing

but no

SOMEHOW MADE IT BOUNCE BACK ANYWAY

AMAZING THAT

HIS ECONOMICS

WERE ULTIMATELY SUPPLY-SIDE HOWEVER

SO YOU HAVE SOCIALIST STATE

hiter would have bene better not touching the german economy at all

WITH RIGHTIST ECONOMY

as it was coming back hard

with growth beneftis

more tha nthe US

and UK

in the 30s

SAME IDEA THAT AMERICANS ADOPTED AFTER WWII

he spent all the money conquering central european shitholes

THE GREAT DEPRESSION WAS PROBABLY A DELAYED RESPONSE TO WWI

pre ww2

he started ww2 when he did as he was broke

and needed the polish and french means of production

INTERESTING THEORY

to take over the lebensraum

HOW WELL DID HE INTEGRATE FRENCH PRODUCTION INTO GERMAN INDUSTRY?

he just took resources

like when he went into romania

that was the point of tkaing the caucauses

but he didn't think about it

how to get the oil

GERMANY ALWAYS NEEDED RESOURCES

THEY HAD COAL BUT WERE SHORT ON OIL

HENCE NORTH AFRICA

as he had maxed out mediterranean shipping with romanian and bulgarian oil fields

he had no way of getting it

if he took saudi arabia

no pipeline

certain british counterattacks

not that he had anyway of getting there on land

or sea

he didn't even have enough stuff to get to the urals

as eastern europe is mud and dirt roads

and blitzkrieg does not work as there is nothing but shtetls and mud and woods

BLITZKRIEG WORKS BEST AGAINST INDUSTRIAL TARGETS THAT CAN BE SEIZED

EASTERN EUROPE WAS MOSTLY PRE-INDUSTRIAL

HOWEVER

HE WOULD HAVE HAD TRAINS

AND COULD HAVE INCREASED SHIPPING

BUT THIS WOULD HAVE CONFLICTED WITH SOME OTHER AIMS

I THINK HIS ERRORS IN THIS AREA ARE OVERSTATED

WHILE HIS MILITARY/LOGISTICAL ERRORS ARE UNDERSTATED

THE SOCIALIST BASIS OF HIS SOCIETY, HOWEVER,

WAS THE ELEMENT OF FAILURE: IT BECAME IDEOLOGICAL INSTEAD OF PRAGMATIC.

Hitler didn't fix Keynesianism. For one, the plans preempted Keynes whereupon Keynes remarked on them in his *General Theory*.

The immense debt taken on by the National Socialist state was overbearing to the point where it would have been eventually forced to take drastic action, and very well may have been. Look up their system of promissory notes -MEFO bills - and see how such a system would necessitate failure unless met with miracle.

And: they were not "Socialists," in the literal sense. The name "National Socialist" was a suggestion from Rudolf Jung, whom also wrote the goals and ideas of National Socialism in his *Der Nazionale Sozialismus* some years earlier. Hitler wished to call the party the Revolution Party or somesuch.

They were more akin to Fascists, but at the same time not explicitly so. A good source on this is Evola's "Notes on the Third Reich."

@diversity_is_racism yes

he had no goal

or enoguh stuff

to conquer russia

yet alone enslave the population

and make lebemsraum

he needed a million horses

just to get his men to the urals

which he didn't have

500,000 off road trucks

he had 40k

and 100k civilian ones that just broke

mostly french

Everyone here types in such an odd manner.

meant for french paved roads

@diversity_is_suicide Who do you think is better? The Hapsburgs or the Hohenzollerns? They could make mighty fine bedfellows if their current stock is as good as their ancient stock. Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and Austria would do well being unified with a Monarchist Germany but...some Royals might have to change their names and move to Brazil with their less than qualified offspring...

Hohenzollerns believed in eugenics, so there's an obvious point for them.

Hohenzollerns didn't breed themselves out of existence

they needed idiocy and war

What were they to do? Not honour an alliance? They did not know of the existence of enemy alliances.

The secret alliance system was responsible for their downfall in the war, but their inevitable downfall really came at the hands of the Jews in our revolution.

Nearly every leader that moved us to the Republican regime was a Jew.

@HonorVirtuisPraemium My own reading (not really proper research) led me to believe that the Hapsburgs (then also Lorraine) had some very fine Emperors. I like them both equally really. However, the Hohenzollerns bred some mighty bad asses for their defenses. Their last Kaizer Wilhelm II just plain made me swoon.

Though, he might have been a bit too eager for war...

Don't know if his eagerness for war is properly portrayed though, he is painted as a war monger.

OUR TYPING MAY BE ODD HERE

BUT IT WORKS

AND WE ARE APPLE ][ COMPATIBLE

REGARDING KEYNES, YES, HITLER PREDATED HIM, BUT KEYNES FORMALIZED THINKING THAT HAD ALREADY EXISTED

THE REASON I REFER TO IT AS KEYNESIANISM IS THAT THIS WAS THE CONCEPT AS IT CAME TO BE KNOWN

AS FAR AS THE SOCIALIST NATURE OF HITLER, I MUST DISAGREE

HE DEPENDED ON THE STATE

AND IDEOLOGY

AND REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME