to conquer russia

yet alone enslave the population

and make lebemsraum

he needed a million horses

just to get his men to the urals

which he didn't have

500,000 off road trucks

he had 40k

and 100k civilian ones that just broke

mostly french

Everyone here types in such an odd manner.

meant for french paved roads

@diversity_is_suicide Who do you think is better? The Hapsburgs or the Hohenzollerns? They could make mighty fine bedfellows if their current stock is as good as their ancient stock. Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and Austria would do well being unified with a Monarchist Germany but...some Royals might have to change their names and move to Brazil with their less than qualified offspring...

Hohenzollerns believed in eugenics, so there's an obvious point for them.

Hohenzollerns didn't breed themselves out of existence

they needed idiocy and war

What were they to do? Not honour an alliance? They did not know of the existence of enemy alliances.

The secret alliance system was responsible for their downfall in the war, but their inevitable downfall really came at the hands of the Jews in our revolution.

Nearly every leader that moved us to the Republican regime was a Jew.

@HonorVirtuisPraemium My own reading (not really proper research) led me to believe that the Hapsburgs (then also Lorraine) had some very fine Emperors. I like them both equally really. However, the Hohenzollerns bred some mighty bad asses for their defenses. Their last Kaizer Wilhelm II just plain made me swoon.

Though, he might have been a bit too eager for war...

Don't know if his eagerness for war is properly portrayed though, he is painted as a war monger.

OUR TYPING MAY BE ODD HERE

BUT IT WORKS

AND WE ARE APPLE ][ COMPATIBLE

REGARDING KEYNES, YES, HITLER PREDATED HIM, BUT KEYNES FORMALIZED THINKING THAT HAD ALREADY EXISTED

THE REASON I REFER TO IT AS KEYNESIANISM IS THAT THIS WAS THE CONCEPT AS IT CAME TO BE KNOWN

AS FAR AS THE SOCIALIST NATURE OF HITLER, I MUST DISAGREE

HE DEPENDED ON THE STATE

AND IDEOLOGY

AND REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

DESPITE MANY STRONG CAPITALIST ELEMENTS

@-A I TEND TO AGREE ON THE ARISTOCRATS

PEOPLE FORGET HOW MUCH REALLY BAD STUFF THEY AVOIDED

HOW LIMITED THEIR POWER HAS BEEN FOR THE PAST THOUSAND YEARS

AND

THE GREATER TRAGEDIES BROUGHT ON BY DEMOCRACY

The redistribution of income through make-work programs at a minimum.

The difference from socialism being that ends were not acquired by happenstance according to illusory circumstance but instead through means, means of work.

Makenworombevr worksm

Make work never works.