HIS ECONOMICS

WERE ULTIMATELY SUPPLY-SIDE HOWEVER

SO YOU HAVE SOCIALIST STATE

hiter would have bene better not touching the german economy at all

WITH RIGHTIST ECONOMY

as it was coming back hard

with growth beneftis

more tha nthe US

and UK

in the 30s

SAME IDEA THAT AMERICANS ADOPTED AFTER WWII

he spent all the money conquering central european shitholes

THE GREAT DEPRESSION WAS PROBABLY A DELAYED RESPONSE TO WWI

pre ww2

he started ww2 when he did as he was broke

and needed the polish and french means of production

INTERESTING THEORY

to take over the lebensraum

HOW WELL DID HE INTEGRATE FRENCH PRODUCTION INTO GERMAN INDUSTRY?

he just took resources

like when he went into romania

that was the point of tkaing the caucauses

but he didn't think about it

how to get the oil

GERMANY ALWAYS NEEDED RESOURCES

THEY HAD COAL BUT WERE SHORT ON OIL

HENCE NORTH AFRICA

as he had maxed out mediterranean shipping with romanian and bulgarian oil fields

he had no way of getting it

if he took saudi arabia

no pipeline

certain british counterattacks

not that he had anyway of getting there on land

or sea

he didn't even have enough stuff to get to the urals

as eastern europe is mud and dirt roads

and blitzkrieg does not work as there is nothing but shtetls and mud and woods

BLITZKRIEG WORKS BEST AGAINST INDUSTRIAL TARGETS THAT CAN BE SEIZED

EASTERN EUROPE WAS MOSTLY PRE-INDUSTRIAL

HOWEVER

HE WOULD HAVE HAD TRAINS