Message from @Death Strike's Bat

Discord ID: 276109834028580865


2017-01-31 22:00:03 UTC  

SAME IDEA THAT AMERICANS ADOPTED AFTER WWII

2017-01-31 22:00:16 UTC  

he spent all the money conquering central european shitholes

2017-01-31 22:00:17 UTC  

THE GREAT DEPRESSION WAS PROBABLY A DELAYED RESPONSE TO WWI

2017-01-31 22:00:18 UTC  

pre ww2

2017-01-31 22:00:22 UTC  

he started ww2 when he did as he was broke

2017-01-31 22:00:31 UTC  

and needed the polish and french means of production

2017-01-31 22:00:32 UTC  

INTERESTING THEORY

2017-01-31 22:00:35 UTC  

to take over the lebensraum

2017-01-31 22:00:48 UTC  

HOW WELL DID HE INTEGRATE FRENCH PRODUCTION INTO GERMAN INDUSTRY?

2017-01-31 22:00:54 UTC  

he just took resources

2017-01-31 22:00:58 UTC  

like when he went into romania

2017-01-31 22:01:03 UTC  

that was the point of tkaing the caucauses

2017-01-31 22:01:07 UTC  

but he didn't think about it

2017-01-31 22:01:11 UTC  

how to get the oil

2017-01-31 22:01:23 UTC  

GERMANY ALWAYS NEEDED RESOURCES

2017-01-31 22:01:28 UTC  

THEY HAD COAL BUT WERE SHORT ON OIL

2017-01-31 22:01:32 UTC  

HENCE NORTH AFRICA

2017-01-31 22:01:38 UTC  

as he had maxed out mediterranean shipping with romanian and bulgarian oil fields

2017-01-31 22:01:45 UTC  

he had no way of getting it

2017-01-31 22:01:49 UTC  

if he took saudi arabia

2017-01-31 22:01:54 UTC  

no pipeline

2017-01-31 22:02:00 UTC  

certain british counterattacks

2017-01-31 22:02:11 UTC  

not that he had anyway of getting there on land

2017-01-31 22:02:12 UTC  

or sea

2017-01-31 22:02:32 UTC  

he didn't even have enough stuff to get to the urals

2017-01-31 22:02:40 UTC  

as eastern europe is mud and dirt roads

2017-01-31 22:03:04 UTC  

and blitzkrieg does not work as there is nothing but shtetls and mud and woods

2017-01-31 22:04:38 UTC  

BLITZKRIEG WORKS BEST AGAINST INDUSTRIAL TARGETS THAT CAN BE SEIZED

2017-01-31 22:04:46 UTC  

EASTERN EUROPE WAS MOSTLY PRE-INDUSTRIAL

2017-01-31 22:04:52 UTC  

HOWEVER

2017-01-31 22:05:01 UTC  

HE WOULD HAVE HAD TRAINS

2017-01-31 22:05:10 UTC  

AND COULD HAVE INCREASED SHIPPING

2017-01-31 22:05:18 UTC  

BUT THIS WOULD HAVE CONFLICTED WITH SOME OTHER AIMS

2017-01-31 22:05:27 UTC  

I THINK HIS ERRORS IN THIS AREA ARE OVERSTATED

2017-01-31 22:05:35 UTC  

WHILE HIS MILITARY/LOGISTICAL ERRORS ARE UNDERSTATED

2017-01-31 22:05:44 UTC  

THE SOCIALIST BASIS OF HIS SOCIETY, HOWEVER,

2017-01-31 22:05:53 UTC  

WAS THE ELEMENT OF FAILURE: IT BECAME IDEOLOGICAL INSTEAD OF PRAGMATIC.

2017-01-31 22:08:05 UTC  

Hitler didn't fix Keynesianism. For one, the plans preempted Keynes whereupon Keynes remarked on them in his *General Theory*.

The immense debt taken on by the National Socialist state was overbearing to the point where it would have been eventually forced to take drastic action, and very well may have been. Look up their system of promissory notes -MEFO bills - and see how such a system would necessitate failure unless met with miracle.

2017-01-31 22:09:24 UTC  

And: they were not "Socialists," in the literal sense. The name "National Socialist" was a suggestion from Rudolf Jung, whom also wrote the goals and ideas of National Socialism in his *Der Nazionale Sozialismus* some years earlier. Hitler wished to call the party the Revolution Party or somesuch.

2017-01-31 22:09:39 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/267086373285134338/276111782165217280/Rudolf_Jung_-_Der_Nazionale_Sozialismus.pdf

2017-01-31 22:10:41 UTC  

They were more akin to Fascists, but at the same time not explicitly so. A good source on this is Evola's "Notes on the Third Reich."