at math

I'm not

@Chilliam Ace are you a female

only the female mind could claim polemical attributions to their effeminate unsourced ramblings

you linked wikipedia and an unsourced attempt to link Marx's work to the US and ran away from any attempt at debating the "capitalist nature" of the USSR and pyatiletkas clearly being not capitalist

and when i called you out on that you copy pasted your own words that didnt even have to do with the USSR that you spoke about vaguely a few minutes prior

@Chilliam Ace

you link a wiki on Marxist-Leninism

@Chilliam Ace no context or direct primary sourcing to back any claim

yeah and you don't think me being a marxist-leninist

who has already posted documents about the marxist-leninist state of the USSR not being capitalist

would know about marxist-leninism

it wasnt an argument because: `you linked wikipedia and an unsourced attempt to link Marx's work to the US and ran away from any attempt at debating the "capitalist nature" of the USSR and pyatiletkas clearly being not capitalist
and when i called you out on that you copy pasted your own words that didnt even have to do with the USSR that you spoke about vaguely a few minutes prior`

you said marxism is capitalism on steroids

you cannot change this to mean anything

youre not even talking about your original point again

you cannot stay on topic

you run out of straws to grab

what the fuck is a civic socialism

you dont even know what socialism is

i am waiting for you to tell me why marxism is capitalism on steroids

capitalist plutocracy

capitalist plutocracy

kleptocracy

a corporatocracy is not anything near socialism

tell me why it is socialism

tell the socialist why bailing out private enterprises that entertwine themself with the state

is socialist

and on top of that tell me why marxism is capitalism on steroids

you did not tell me why

you are evading

do it now

ultimatum

tell me what socialism is

do not change the argument

tell me why bailing out private enterprise is socialism and why marxism is capitalism on steroids

tell me why bailing out private enterprise is socialism and why marxism is capitalism on steroids

Was Pinochet a socialist when he bailed out the banks in 1981 when he departed from free floating exchange rates? @Chilliam Ace

@Chilliam Ace

@agag this aint it chief

@PebbЛe so, to be part in a religion, must we all know a thorough understanding in the theology behind it?

or, to be a follower

why would you consider yourself a Christian if you become a Prot and not understand the point of reformation from the RCC

if we understand the Bible, and at least to find some meaning in what we believe, why question it, if others already have

because why would you seek to find some meaning and be infallible from ostracization as an individual when the universal structure of teachings has been transmitted through instruction and consecration since Christ himself

why would you consider yourself a Christian if you ignore the entire structure of Christianity

and read some dusty parchments

because, we assume that the people who do go into theology and attempt to understand the entire background of a religion will do it for you? are those people, then, the only true followers of a religion?

@LiT potato and do you see that happening in prot churches?

what do you mean

when the basis of the apostolic church is `people who do go into theology and attempt to understand the entire background of a religion...for you`

and prot churches dont have any teaching of tradition or history

they are decentralized bible clubs

are you saying that we aren’t influenced enough by the people who do study it then?

I guess that is a major flaw in current protestantism

the idea is that prot churches dont teach anything relating to Christianity but feelsgoodman tier reconciliation with their daily sins out of the bible

If we assume that this is truly what protestantism is, why would we need to defend

it if our lives are based around it

oh wait

i did a dumb

its apostolic Church that Jesus started and has history and tradition stemming for 2k years or decentralized prot churches that rhizomatically extend and break canon and continually fracture the meaning of Christianity

so are you saying that to keep our minds and thoughts unified, we must all delve into the history and tradition of what Jesus intended the church to become?

and question when our branches lead us off that path

The church should belong to the central body that succeeded Christ and the apostles as intended

so the early church that Peter “began”

the Church that Peter held primacy over and that the apostles consecrated their successors for

what we have now is only because we did delve deeper, to seek more meaning in that tradition, that history, that we were left with

No the early church that Christ began when he established it with peter at its head

which Peter spread

@Chilliam Ace bailing out the banks is not Socialism

we had to do it to prevent the entire system from falling apart

@agag notice how he doesn't know anything

Socialism would be nationalizing the banks

muh government do thing? that socailsm

carl marks said government to do thing

@PebbЛe why is he gone

why never respond

he might have gone to sleep at 10pm like a normal person

he was in voice earlier man I saw him in there

@Chilliam Ace was pinochet a socialist

he bailed out the banks in '81

I'm most likely wrong about this, but Sigmund Freud's work mostly depicted the minds of sluts as well as soyboy-manwhores, while also advocating for the conversion of EVERYBODY into a masturbation-addicted mindless soywhore/dykeslut.

You mean his stages of life?

Where one related to a specific part of the body

Oral stage, phallic stage,etc.

Not just that, I'm talking about EVERY piece of his work relating to how, according to him, the entire human brain is driven purely by the desire for sexual pleasure, which INCLUDES his "Stages Of Life" idea.

And people's mothers

He had quite the fixation on people's mothers being the reason for their psychological development

He really liked some motherfuckers, that's for sure.

Back on topic, it's fucking sick.

Well he was right about the oedipus complex

Yes, but of all the things to name them, why would he make them all pertain to sexual acts?

Especially if it has to do with CHILDREN DEVELOPING?

He saw the body as a pretty damn important part of psychology and the idea of cognition wasn't really prevalent at his time.

He was physical with his ideas instead of metaphysical like the idea of cognition today

That's understandable, but why wouldn't he name them as `Consumption`, `Expulsion`, and `Desire`?

The oral stage was consumption basically

That's what I meant.

It makes no sense to give a deeply sexual name to non-sexual events unless you explicitly have a fetish for those events.

Again he identified consumption with insatiability as a child