@Chilliam Ace no context or direct primary sourcing to back any claim

yeah and you don't think me being a marxist-leninist

who has already posted documents about the marxist-leninist state of the USSR not being capitalist

would know about marxist-leninism

it wasnt an argument because: `you linked wikipedia and an unsourced attempt to link Marx's work to the US and ran away from any attempt at debating the "capitalist nature" of the USSR and pyatiletkas clearly being not capitalist
and when i called you out on that you copy pasted your own words that didnt even have to do with the USSR that you spoke about vaguely a few minutes prior`

you said marxism is capitalism on steroids

you cannot change this to mean anything

youre not even talking about your original point again

you cannot stay on topic

you run out of straws to grab

what the fuck is a civic socialism

you dont even know what socialism is

i am waiting for you to tell me why marxism is capitalism on steroids

capitalist plutocracy

capitalist plutocracy

kleptocracy

a corporatocracy is not anything near socialism

tell me why it is socialism

tell the socialist why bailing out private enterprises that entertwine themself with the state

is socialist

and on top of that tell me why marxism is capitalism on steroids

you did not tell me why

you are evading

do it now

ultimatum

tell me what socialism is

do not change the argument

tell me why bailing out private enterprise is socialism and why marxism is capitalism on steroids

tell me why bailing out private enterprise is socialism and why marxism is capitalism on steroids

Was Pinochet a socialist when he bailed out the banks in 1981 when he departed from free floating exchange rates? @Chilliam Ace

@Chilliam Ace

@agag this aint it chief

@PebbЛe so, to be part in a religion, must we all know a thorough understanding in the theology behind it?

or, to be a follower

why would you consider yourself a Christian if you become a Prot and not understand the point of reformation from the RCC

if we understand the Bible, and at least to find some meaning in what we believe, why question it, if others already have

because why would you seek to find some meaning and be infallible from ostracization as an individual when the universal structure of teachings has been transmitted through instruction and consecration since Christ himself

why would you consider yourself a Christian if you ignore the entire structure of Christianity

and read some dusty parchments

because, we assume that the people who do go into theology and attempt to understand the entire background of a religion will do it for you? are those people, then, the only true followers of a religion?

@LiT potato and do you see that happening in prot churches?