because why would you seek to find some meaning and be infallible from ostracization as an individual when the universal structure of teachings has been transmitted through instruction and consecration since Christ himself

why would you consider yourself a Christian if you ignore the entire structure of Christianity

and read some dusty parchments

because, we assume that the people who do go into theology and attempt to understand the entire background of a religion will do it for you? are those people, then, the only true followers of a religion?

@LiT potato and do you see that happening in prot churches?

what do you mean

when the basis of the apostolic church is `people who do go into theology and attempt to understand the entire background of a religion...for you`

and prot churches dont have any teaching of tradition or history

they are decentralized bible clubs

are you saying that we aren’t influenced enough by the people who do study it then?

I guess that is a major flaw in current protestantism

the idea is that prot churches dont teach anything relating to Christianity but feelsgoodman tier reconciliation with their daily sins out of the bible

If we assume that this is truly what protestantism is, why would we need to defend

it if our lives are based around it

oh wait

i did a dumb

its apostolic Church that Jesus started and has history and tradition stemming for 2k years or decentralized prot churches that rhizomatically extend and break canon and continually fracture the meaning of Christianity

so are you saying that to keep our minds and thoughts unified, we must all delve into the history and tradition of what Jesus intended the church to become?

and question when our branches lead us off that path

The church should belong to the central body that succeeded Christ and the apostles as intended

so the early church that Peter “began”

the Church that Peter held primacy over and that the apostles consecrated their successors for

what we have now is only because we did delve deeper, to seek more meaning in that tradition, that history, that we were left with

No the early church that Christ began when he established it with peter at its head

which Peter spread

@Chilliam Ace bailing out the banks is not Socialism

we had to do it to prevent the entire system from falling apart

@agag notice how he doesn't know anything

Socialism would be nationalizing the banks

muh government do thing? that socailsm

carl marks said government to do thing

@PebbЛe why is he gone

why never respond

he might have gone to sleep at 10pm like a normal person

he was in voice earlier man I saw him in there

@Chilliam Ace was pinochet a socialist

he bailed out the banks in '81

I'm most likely wrong about this, but Sigmund Freud's work mostly depicted the minds of sluts as well as soyboy-manwhores, while also advocating for the conversion of EVERYBODY into a masturbation-addicted mindless soywhore/dykeslut.

You mean his stages of life?

Where one related to a specific part of the body

Oral stage, phallic stage,etc.