Message from @PebbЛe
Discord ID: 492657479369359370
i did a dumb
its apostolic Church that Jesus started and has history and tradition stemming for 2k years or decentralized prot churches that rhizomatically extend and break canon and continually fracture the meaning of Christianity
so are you saying that to keep our minds and thoughts unified, we must all delve into the history and tradition of what Jesus intended the church to become?
and question when our branches lead us off that path
The church should belong to the central body that succeeded Christ and the apostles as intended
so the early church that Peter “began”
the Church that Peter held primacy over and that the apostles consecrated their successors for
what we have now is only because we did delve deeper, to seek more meaning in that tradition, that history, that we were left with
No the early church that Christ began when he established it with peter at its head
which Peter spread
@Chilliam Ace bailing out the banks is not Socialism
we had to do it to prevent the entire system from falling apart
Socialism would be nationalizing the banks
muh government do thing? that socailsm
carl marks said government to do thing
why never respond
he might have gone to sleep at 10pm like a normal person
he was in voice earlier man I saw him in there
he bailed out the banks in '81
I'm most likely wrong about this, but Sigmund Freud's work mostly depicted the minds of sluts as well as soyboy-manwhores, while also advocating for the conversion of EVERYBODY into a masturbation-addicted mindless soywhore/dykeslut.
You mean his stages of life?
Where one related to a specific part of the body
Oral stage, phallic stage,etc.
Not just that, I'm talking about EVERY piece of his work relating to how, according to him, the entire human brain is driven purely by the desire for sexual pleasure, which INCLUDES his "Stages Of Life" idea.
And people's mothers
He had quite the fixation on people's mothers being the reason for their psychological development
He really liked some motherfuckers, that's for sure.
Back on topic, it's fucking sick.
Well he was right about the oedipus complex
Yes, but of all the things to name them, why would he make them all pertain to sexual acts?
Especially if it has to do with CHILDREN DEVELOPING?
He saw the body as a pretty damn important part of psychology and the idea of cognition wasn't really prevalent at his time.
He was physical with his ideas instead of metaphysical like the idea of cognition today
That's understandable, but why wouldn't he name them as `Consumption`, `Expulsion`, and `Desire`?
The oral stage was consumption basically
That's what I meant.
It makes no sense to give a deeply sexual name to non-sexual events unless you explicitly have a fetish for those events.
Again he identified consumption with insatiability as a child