he basically invented a new language

nah not into theosophy

athroposphy/theosophy 👍

the pyramid focuses the sun's energy which causes the natural water reserves below the pyramid to steam the steam is used to create electricity.

Vedic>larper occultism

nice "free" energy

occultism is just a spook

occultism is aperceptive calivoyant vision of transhumanism

im a 3rd degree runemaster

clarivoyany

w.e

it's demonic usually

its all ideas

ideas can be demonic

that which is true is most useful

Truth emanates and only comes from God

if your ideology seeks to personally empower

without God

it is demonic

personal is illusion

it's not

Atman and soul are existent

there is no seperation

God speaks to us through Person

we cannot understand the divine in any other way

all things are of god

This is why there is Brahman and Krsna/Visnu. This is why there's the divinity made manifest over the years.

we only understand god

No, everything is not God.

God created the world, we are not Him

my god is almighty

We contain his energies, our consciousness and soul is from Him.

lol that gif

But we are not Him

i fundamentally disagree

division is maya

we are everything in our true form

the higher body is unity

Krsna says it himself. The material world are like the pearls, and He is the thread which holds it together. He can manifest within the material, but is not subject to its illusion/limitations.

The Orthodox Christian essence energy distinction is critical here to understand. Even fi you disagree with their other theology

that seems fitting for an avatar of vishnu

vril doent believe in the supernatural or prminitions hes not an real theist

how has this server been able to hide from ***them*** with so many members

If you view Atman as the essence of God, then you can argue that you yourself are a piece of God.

We follow discord Tos

Here on Trs

It is not the essence, it is the energy of God.

so if i say

nigger

then what

i view everything as piece of the body of god

Dvaita Vedanta makes the most sense.

not even essentialistic

That is illogical, because Maya exists

How can God eb tricked by illusion?

be*

maya is an illusion part of god

God's traits are omniscience, omnipotence and omnibenevolence

these are invariant

how does a hermit go mad?

God cannot be under illusion once

and not be in another kind

solitude is impetus to cosmogensis

also in your view, if the illusory world is God, then what is truth?

how can you know what is true?

truth is that which is most useful

if everything is God, including illusion and lies, how do you differentiate between them?

that is satanism

(efficient/sustainable)

efficiency and pragmatism

satan is a name

pantheism is a spook dude

I just explained why it's contradictory

all things are one thing

@hemi thats easy one , just contradict yourself

division is a spook

@hemi If all things are one thing, then why don't we all share the traits of divinity which differentiate it?

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-of-the-most-interesting-shower-thoughts-you-have-had/answer/Soyeb-Akther

after that kill yourself, in a good way

contradiction is unified in the mysteries

Why isn't everything omniscient?

omnipotent?

omnibenevolent?

contradiction is not unified

there is some reason for reorganization

there's nothing proving we don't live in a simulation

<:PepeChill:378748692741750794>

you cannot affirm logic by even acknowledging the ontology of contradiction, but then deny it entirely by saying "lol it's all one"

The entire universe is made of a single electron moving back and forth in time and interacting with itself <:TrumpSmile:356316463490924561>

that theology ultimately makes everything meaningless

@Lockmarth hospitals

It's pretty obvious that everything is *not* God

just by using simple logic

simulate healing

God has traits which define the ontology of that being of Godhead.

The physical world does not share those traits

ontology just throws me off here

therefore the physical maya is not God

being, the nature of being

Your epistemology also falls apart

if everything is God, then does that mean lies are truth now?

since everything is God right?

im not understanding what ur saying.. not trying to be annoying or dumn

hospitals spit in my mouth with that bill

ya you're arguing monism or pantheism

mm

it doesn't make any sense

hang on

on my phone. i wanna understand u

yh pretty damn real simulation

I'm refuting your idea that everything is one

dem medical bills

everything is not one

well i dont see how a lie cant become true if the environment changes enough etc

this was proven wrong by Aristotle when he discussed the difference between the one and the many, and the ontology or natural being of things

>arguing objective ttruth with a brainlet

what ar you doing

so for example, we know that dogs exist, but we also know that dogs have an essence to them that is apart from just the physical figure of a dog

meh people reading it benefit too

imo

@Aisa im a brainlet?

Anyone watch the McGregor fight?

nope

It was sad

test wha tis 1+2

lamp

the answer is objectively true

no alt universe shit

i dont see how u refute anything i said

You can easily disprove pantheism and monism just through the one and the many essence example.

And in a broader sense because epistemology itself would make no sense

essence have one source?

and their seperations are illusory

Yes, but that doesn't mean source = essence

their separations are not illusory, you can prove through logic that they are not

@StaySarcastic NYPA

go away

no u

im black

negro

shit

hes good

too good

so all of existence is an extremely complex planck scale geometry

<:FeelsFedora:356316725865611264>

whats essential about that

no, because things which exist have more to them than just physical pattern/substance

there is an inherent intrinsic ontology or being to things

this is what I speak of when I'm saying we can differentiate

it's not an illusion, it's a metaphysical concept which is necessary

what is actually illusion is the temporal physical world

the metaphysics, the substrata conceptual invariant world is not illusory

yes you argue essentialism

ok , if you try to divide by zero you will always get infinity, no matter if you swap processors or not does that naswer your question

i say the essential is reaction impression from planck scale reality

machines says theres no objective truth but we create dmachines

what is with niggers and dragon ball z???

@hemi the holographic planck scale reality thing doesn't matter because even at the tiniest fractional sub atomic level the metaphysical invariant conceptual differentiation stuff applies

the idea of a ball came from see a thing roll down a hill

What is with new users and anime pfp's?

you're just reducing your position into absurdity

a thing rolling down a hill didnt come from the idea of a ball

thats not absurd at all thats logic lol

which is why atheism, agnosticism, and pantheism/monism are reductio ad absurdum positions necessarily

they rely on deconstruction of reality to then make their position that there is unity, or that there is no absolute truth

what other approach is there?

yh u just triggred me

the approach through metaphysics

the understanding of things as more than their temporal substance

<:GWragChad:390321737230843905>

fucking vedics

metaphysics is of the mind which is an emergent complexity of consciousness. this mind is negentropy

I wanna call it wholistic, but that word has been hijacked by new age faggots

no, it's not just a property of the brain or mind

consciousness or Atman relies on metaphysics

he thinks that everything being energy is reductio abusrdum

will itself is a function of a sort of sub logos identity that we all have

look up Aristotelian self actualization argument

consciousness is being researched objectively now

matter is composed of energy

@hemi no it's not

because consciousness cannot be understood on a relativistic basis

yes it is

lol sorry friend

it again reduces into absurdity

may i post research?

there is plenty

because deterministic chain of causation for impetus of neuronal firing or whatever you're looking at has no overall basis

yh hemi is rightt though

20 yrs of it

it is merely a fractional analysis of a dialectical approach

and devolves into relativism

which doesn't bring you any knowledge

brain scinec will btfo vedics

it only further dissects information into blocks

no its called orchestrated objective reduction

consciousness is not emergent

mind is

ok wut budy

yea .

it's not objective, because you're taking subjective arbitrary points and creating a dialectic upon which you operate between these two

that literally implausible

it's the same thing you do metaphysically when you both affirm and deny metaphysics

this is why modern science fails

no there is an actual physical phenomena occuring in the microtubulin substructure of the neuron

that leads to consciousness

seeing you get laughed out of a science conference by atheist chads feels goodman

@hemi No, because again you cannot link the deterministic chain

and the hypothesis involves the copenhagen interpetation

and if you play the atheist "brute fact" card then you'd be denying causal logic

this isnt atheism

you can't state that consciousness is a physical process because you'd run into the problem of determining from where impulse is ultimately tracked to the beginning of the universe

upon which you have two options

negentropy

you either reduce into absurdity and reject causation itself with the infinite regression pov

or you must accept the theistic pov

its negentropy breh

which ultimately explains consciousness without a physical component

and yes i amm theistic about my negentropy nom nom

no consciousness requires orchestration

@hemi again you're affirming and denying logic

@Thule-Gesellschaft [☩] hey Thule, sorry to bother, but do you happen to have "On Combat" pdf by Dave Grossman?

negentropy or reversing entropy is rejecting the law of repeatability of outcome

atheism is consciouness evolved from matter but is not matter

which depends necessarily on metaphysics

which you reject with your materialist conclusions

for objective reduction to be conscious it requires orchestration

no i dont wholly reject metaphysics

@sasha I do not sorry

wish i had my pc

@hemi I'll explain consciousness and free will

phone

without needless scientism

lol

you're aware of the self actualization argument for God's necessary existence?

youll explaine orchestrated objective reduction in the microtubulin substructure of the neuron?

because this approach is dare I say *contingent* on your understanding of this lel

@hemi yes

the physical process is kind of irrelevant

okie dokie

you can reduce it to whatever strata of reality you want

it doesn't change the gravitas or the logic

Wtf?

I think this nigga just wants to flaunt how intelligent he is

ok i hear ya

no

female btw

but no

just passion