Message from @hemi
Discord ID: 498399984509517842
lamp
the answer is objectively true
no alt universe shit
i dont see how u refute anything i said
You can easily disprove pantheism and monism just through the one and the many essence example.
And in a broader sense because epistemology itself would make no sense
essence have one source?
and their seperations are illusory
Yes, but that doesn't mean source = essence
their separations are not illusory, you can prove through logic that they are not
@StaySarcastic NYPA
go away
no u
im black
negro
shit
hes good
too good
so all of existence is an extremely complex planck scale geometry
<:FeelsFedora:356316725865611264>
no, because things which exist have more to them than just physical pattern/substance
there is an inherent intrinsic ontology or being to things
this is what I speak of when I'm saying we can differentiate
it's not an illusion, it's a metaphysical concept which is necessary
what is actually illusion is the temporal physical world
the metaphysics, the substrata conceptual invariant world is not illusory
yes you argue essentialism
ok , if you try to divide by zero you will always get infinity, no matter if you swap processors or not does that naswer your question
i say the essential is reaction impression from planck scale reality
machines says theres no objective truth but we create dmachines
what is with niggers and dragon ball z???
@hemi the holographic planck scale reality thing doesn't matter because even at the tiniest fractional sub atomic level the metaphysical invariant conceptual differentiation stuff applies
the idea of a ball came from see a thing roll down a hill
What is with new users and anime pfp's?
you're just reducing your position into absurdity
a thing rolling down a hill didnt come from the idea of a ball
thats not absurd at all thats logic lol
which is why atheism, agnosticism, and pantheism/monism are reductio ad absurdum positions necessarily
they rely on deconstruction of reality to then make their position that there is unity, or that there is no absolute truth
what other approach is there?