Message from @Aisa
Discord ID: 498401159044923392
what is actually illusion is the temporal physical world
the metaphysics, the substrata conceptual invariant world is not illusory
yes you argue essentialism
ok , if you try to divide by zero you will always get infinity, no matter if you swap processors or not does that naswer your question
i say the essential is reaction impression from planck scale reality
machines says theres no objective truth but we create dmachines
what is with niggers and dragon ball z???
@hemi the holographic planck scale reality thing doesn't matter because even at the tiniest fractional sub atomic level the metaphysical invariant conceptual differentiation stuff applies
the idea of a ball came from see a thing roll down a hill
What is with new users and anime pfp's?
you're just reducing your position into absurdity
a thing rolling down a hill didnt come from the idea of a ball
thats not absurd at all thats logic lol
which is why atheism, agnosticism, and pantheism/monism are reductio ad absurdum positions necessarily
they rely on deconstruction of reality to then make their position that there is unity, or that there is no absolute truth
what other approach is there?
yh u just triggred me
the approach through metaphysics
the understanding of things as more than their temporal substance
<:GWragChad:390321737230843905>
metaphysics is of the mind which is an emergent complexity of consciousness. this mind is negentropy
I wanna call it wholistic, but that word has been hijacked by new age faggots
no, it's not just a property of the brain or mind
consciousness or Atman relies on metaphysics
he thinks that everything being energy is reductio abusrdum
will itself is a function of a sort of sub logos identity that we all have
look up Aristotelian self actualization argument
consciousness is being researched objectively now
matter is composed of energy
@hemi no it's not
because consciousness cannot be understood on a relativistic basis
yes it is
lol sorry friend
it again reduces into absurdity
may i post research?
there is plenty
because deterministic chain of causation for impetus of neuronal firing or whatever you're looking at has no overall basis
yh hemi is rightt though
20 yrs of it
it is merely a fractional analysis of a dialectical approach