and has led to more poverty, death, and overall poor living conditions than any other political system

Hello?

@Platypus#6961 hello

Can anyone tell me the number of times communism has been successful?

Way to many

0 is the correct answer

If any of you hate pino

Gas yourself

Pinochet was an american puppet that enslaved his country to international capital

and killed tons of em too

International capitalists?

What is international capitalism?

Is it just all in the name?

@Deleted User

Or am I dumb?

What

i'm dumb

and killed tons of em too= killed lots of them his people

ewwwwww they're all commies! OMG is this like their secret club or something? ahahahahaha

why would we privatize this?

it's public

there's also more right-wingers than leftists here probably

^

Pinoshit is **n o t h i n g**

helloww

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cb0_1447249820

?

herro

🤔

I legit joined this server for the memes but I was disappointed by not so much

meh it's a good server

Right-wing politics https://discord.gg/u3fGkK3

thats communism...

got it mixed up mate

Joined

?ban <@214195631760211969>

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***ColeBurnz#3593 was banned!***

why are there memes in the theory channel >:o

<#314649062928547840> as it is my man. No bullshit, no fake news, no tolerance.

i know they've been coopted by nrx and whatnot, but are deleuze&guattari relevant in modern leftist theory?

diamonds are just carbon

suppose that the state falls

what groups would you be comfortable working with, and at some point reaching an ideological compromise with, in order to defeat the ruling class?

@everyone

Every group which agrees to work under communist authority.

that's not ideological compromise though

It is practical compromise.

I do not think it is practical

communism is rather fringe

The organization under authority is practical.

there can be no division in the revolution

the problem is that 99% would not want to be under communism

but would be happy for socialism somewhat

do you mean goulash communism?

Does it matter what majority wants at every time? Today they want one thing, tomorrow another.

Organization under authority works every time.

well when I say the majority

I mean the majority of those who would rebel in the first place

against this sick society

In which country?

I had the US in mind

I don't have it in mind.

which were you thinking of?

Every other?

India for example.

They would burn capitalist pigs nicely

Yes?

sure why not

I suppose that I can't really support communism

I support a purge of the executive class

but I am against centralisation etc

I do not support the purge and I'm in favor of centralization.

why not?

It is possible to take power without the purge of the whole class. It is possible to use other methods of control over it.

but certain elements must go?

It depends on a situation in the country and the country itself at every moment. Use any means necessary. Priority means is creative intelligent solution and not violence.

I support that

Lenin argued there is no bloodless revolution. But some revolutions may have very little blood or almost none. It depends. Better the governance skills of the rebels less violence is necessary.

I sure love grainy jpgs

https://prorivists.wordpress.com/source-of-opportunism/

What if – instead of ‘How Do You Make Yourself A Body WithoutOrgans?’ – one were to ask: how do you make yourself a Nazi?For this is far more strenuous than the 1980 diagnosis suggests.
1) Wherever there is impersonality and chance introduceconspiracy, lucidity. and malice. Look for enemies everywhere,ensuring that they are such that one than simultaneously envyand condemn them. Proliferate new subjectivities; racia1 subjects,national subjects, elites, secret societies, destinies.
2) Burn Freud, and take desire back to the Kantian conception ofwill. Wherever there is impulse represent it as choice, decision,the whole theatrical drama of volition. Introduce a gloomyatmosphere of oppressive responsibility by couching alldiscourses in the imperative form.
3) Revere the principle of the great individual. Personalize andmythicize historical processes. Love obedience above all things.and enthuse only for signs; the name of the leader, the symbol ofthe movement, and the icons of molar identity.
4) Foster nostalgia for what is maximally bovine, inflexible, andstagnant: a line of racially pure peasants digging the same patchof earth for eternity.
5) Above all. resent everything impetuous and irresponsible, insistupon unrelenting vigilance, crush sexuality under its reproductivefunction, rigidly enforce the domestication of women, distrust art,
classicize cities to eliminate the disorder of uncontrolled flows,and persecute all minorities exhibiting a nomadic tendency.

It's from a PDF so it probably dosn't copy paste well

lots of words get mashed together

but you get the picture

hello

Hail Posadas

Do you just understand basic economics ?

@Chaton Do u understand any economics?

No.

Do you?

@Chaton You know that the 'basic economics' you are learned is Capitalist economics and not Socialist/Communist economics, right?

No.

Proper economic theory can actually be applied to a variety of systems

It is only a failure of imagination that ties economists to capitalism or socialism

For example, i advocate a system where society is composed of co-operatives operating within the resources and regulatory context of collectives, which are in turn confederated together; this takes place on the scale of a city state. Imagine a libertariam market socialist singapore, if you will.