Fuck

Up

M'lady

>be @National Trotskyist
>doesn't know what a meme arrow is

Our government is sliding ever closer to fascism, but you know what the 7:30 report wants to talk about. The impact of child porn. On the wives of people caught with it.

So. I married a rock spider...

@Chairman Meow HAH, that ain't fascism, that is a totalitarian oligarcy using capitalism to control the lemmings.

Can you guys expand on your points or link some articles n shit. @Chairman Meow @Deleted User

@Aesthetic Bored Why would I need to expand my point with an article?

You dont.

I said expand your point __**or**__ link an article.

@Deleted User

Meh, unless he responds to me asking that I expand it, I don't think it is necessary.

I asked but whatever babe have fun

Well what exactly did you want me to expand upon?

What's the difference between fascism and a totalitarian oligarchy?

I don't know shit.

@Aesthetic Bored Oligarchies are often run by groups, usually headed by the richest, and most powerful in a country, while a fascist government would be headed by one person, and that is not even mentioning how it is anti materialism, meaning that currency would have been modified so that it would not have the ability to gain such power, while the monopolies would be nationalized.

🤔

thank you

🚫 👨‍❤️‍👨

in case didnt know i was talking about the goberment using the feds to harass trade unions for political benefit. IT seems they arent even willing to tolerate their ineffectual existence anymore

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-02/adani-chinese-state-owned-companies-in-deal-to-bankroll-mine/9109880

Fucking maotists! At what point can we stop upholding solidarity with these imperialists.

?

Wait? Are American leftists not aware that modern china is not Maoist in any real way any more?

i just wanted to say maotist. Cant i say it, just once?

No

You have no rights

Will maotists defend this?

Why would they?

They don't exist

Are you sure about that fam

Y

Then I'm sorry to inform you that you're wrong

Is there people that want to violently and openly destroy traditional culture in order to try and modernise their country to be able to once more compete (economically and civilizationally) with a de facto coloniser? Larpers and fringe groups with no influence don't count.

fuck dude. your speaking my language.

Stop. I can only get so erect

Example of larper that does not count: @Chairman Meow

Mainstream australia is doing a pretty good job already

Are they sending people to be shot because they know some traditional artisanal skill?

i hope so

@Apollo'sJest yes, there are people like that however they might not be so keen on sharing your interpretation of their ideology

If no - they not Maoist fam

@Cotton In that case they are just idiots that larp as some ideal of a romanticised revolutionary rather than a real thing.

the real thing*

The fact that someone proudly proclaims themselves to be Napoleon Bonaparte does not mean that they ARE the (in)famous Emperor of the French

Is that so, are you gonna call the Maoist revolution a hoax? That people like that didn't exist?

They DID exist

Yep

and, thank God, they don't really any more

And ideas don't die within a generation, this is literally what it means to be an ideology

Oh sure

but they are irrelevant in terms of influence

As u mentionned the people that might identify as Maoist

See, the most retarded ideology in the history so called national socialism still have supporters up to this day

Don't even think you should kill people that know traditional archery techniques on sight

They are not Maoists

They just leared a "cool" word and want to be it

learned*

That doesn't make them any less maoists or any less "x"ist

They might be weak in practice

Yes it DOES make them less maoist

If I am a practicing Catholic

it does not matter how much I believe that I am actually a Shia Muslim

And how much I proclaim it to the world

I'm not one

Not in any true sense

Otherwise proper nouns loose all meaning

Alright so I can't identify myself freely, if I'm not going to fight for it or shoot people in regards to my ideology?

You are free to call yourself a giraffe. It simply won't make you one - you will be wrong. Modern colleage campus "Maoists" are free to call themselves that but they are wrong. Maoism REQUIRES you to shoot people that stand in the way of the revolution. There is no such thing as moderate Maoism. Not to mention Chinese Communism was always distinctly Nationalistic as it was seen as a tool to overthrow the Western de facto colonisers first and foremost. Modern US "Maoists" have no coloniser to fight against - even if they wanted to be Maoist AND started killing they still wouldn't be true Maoists. They'd be simmilar but not quite there still...

Not to mention modern Western Communists believe in a ridiculously romanticised version of Communism that simply does not compare to the real thing in action

They are useful indoctrinated idiots

(for the most part)

They are tools of the ideology

Not actual ideologues

Somewhat somilarily to your average Russian peasant in the 1920s

They are not communists

they are simply being used by Communists for their Communist goals

You're confusing the means and actions taken by any community to proclaim their goals and their actual belief

If I say that I am an "x"ist, it's not because I want a massacre in the name of x, it's because I think x is the ideal form of a society

How we reach there is irrelevant

See, most of the commies you will see online, except from the edgy teens who make "1 mil years of gulag ehehe" jokes constantly believe education will bring communism, this means they don't want to repeat the bloodbath that happened with soviets

Sure, you're right

They are Communists

(and retards)

but not MAoisrs

If I had to choose a spiritual father for them I'd go with Liev "Trotsky" Bronshtein rather than Mao

BAsed on that modus operandi you described

S'not exactly there

but it's miles closer to being there than to being Maoist

I mean if we wanted to be really precise

They are probably more like Satrists-Marcuseists

with the emphesis on Marcuseists

but even then

I'd still call them tools of Marcuse's Ideas

rather than promlgators of them

MArcuse was a fucking propagandist

he didn't believe any of the shit he sold to these cunts

he did it 'cause he saw it as a viable tactic