@Deleted User not much. Fast progress.

Progress...to what?

This is a mindfuck.

To nothing.

Nothing?!

absolute nothing

I can't...

Is this not troubling to you?

I need to lie down.

https://youtu.be/yBnCo2SKafU

https://youtu.be/EMJx5nzubpc

https://youtu.be/Yy-GG0h-pJ4

At first they made Dzerzhinski statue fall, now we'e got Leninofall in Ukraine. What we do?

https://youtu.be/5iT3jxiWeXE

Earlier there was some hardlining against nationalism, which struck me later when I realized that nationalists have refined the dialects of criticism to a level of sophistication which ought to scare the dogshit right out of any third-world theorist's mouth.

The only reason nationalism would be hardlined against is to corrupt the first world enough with third-worldwrs

But since the nationalists have a more effective dialectic, it's all gonna go to shit.

Lmfao

@OF-8 Is this how you spend your time, manufacturing make-believe strawmen to strike down? Go back to playing with your toys.

I spend my time in many different dimensions. This is but one of my playthings.

Is this how seriously you take yourself? Go back to seriousing with your play set ideology

Political theory is serious business.

"This is but one of my playthings."

'stop taking yourself so seriously'

get yourself a cognitive dissonance where u can be a self absorbed prick while also telling others to stop taking themselves so seriously

Basically yeah. That's one of the features of material dialectics isn't it?

Am I misunderstanding something here?

What is the feature of diamat you are referring to?

>where u can be a self absorbed prick while also telling others to stop taking themselves so seriously

I am not aware of that feature. Please cite it for us.

Anywhere in the scrollback fam. Pick a winning post.

Please cite it for us.

Is that a thing that is normal to do or because you feel I may not be taking any of this seriously

Where you have to cite chapter and verse of some "source" rather than just be creative and shitpost.

Because if it is a normal thing to do, I don't need to cite it, you should already know.

Observation and quotation are gonna be different things, are you allowed to think this?

What did you mean by 'nationalists have refined the dialects of criticism to a level of sophistication', for example. It reads vague and unintelligible.

Either you do this on purpose or you do not care. Which is why I was rude to you.

If you want a discussion, you have to be clear in your point of view, and at least charitable to hear the view of the opposite.

If that is too 'serious' for you, what can I tell you.

I want to move on from this.

...

Don't engage if you would rather not, cognitive autonomy is pretty serious business.

Nationalists, in their forums have been able to criticize their own ideas with sharper tools than global socialists.

Good advice.

Socialist ideas, once let out into the world smell rather stale and soviet.

The difference here is that superior critical dialogue.

What is wrong with Soviet?

Soviet scent is distasteful to those not used to it.

You've become blind to the stink of soviet think

That's a rhetorical statement. How is it distasteful?

Political systems are made of rhetoric, comrade

Sure.

So you mean to say, Nationalism is rhetorical.

😅

I'll cop to that.

Rhetoric plus logos is realpolitik, and that's that.

Achetypical theory is vague and scientifically unfalsifiable.

Ukraine prohibits access to several Russia-based sites that are popular amongst Ukrainians: Yandex (useful site and cool browser), Mail.ru (mail client), VKontakte and Odnoklassniki (both social networks like Facebook): http://ftimes.ru/trends/172209-poroshenko-zapretil-na-ukraine-yandeks-majl-ru-vkontakte-i-odnoklassniki-poroshenko-zapretil-ukraincam-vkontakte-i-odnoklassniki.html

Reducing everything to subjective psychological explanations and vague quasi-mystical assertions is not a valid counter to materialism.

North Korea > Ukraine

Cuba >>> Ukraine

Not going to compare USSR

Under the regime of materialism nothing is a counter to materialism so it's a far gone conclusion and certainly not the goal.

Mockery of materialism is a primary goal. The depth of which is being determined by this line of thought.

@OF-8 False. Materialism is based on logic and observation. It is easily falsifiable. Can you show me a disembodied mind?

Lmfao

I'm going to bed. Soon I will connect with a disembodied mind, and you're too stuck in the idiocy of materialism that you won't realize, you do the same.

Keep that tin foil hat on fam, worlds a lot easier to deal with when you're hylic.

No need to be so defensive. Sweet dreams.

All known mental activity has a physical basis. You will have to show the exception to disprove the notion.

@everyone New <#314649062928547840> channel is up and running.

@everyone Please join voice chat.

i agree

Hey, commies. On the right-wing servers there is discussion, organization and discipline. You are capable of nothing.

communism debunked

*Discord discipline intensifies*

Hey who wants to read a book by one of the most influential socialists ever

which one?

This one https://endchan.xyz/.media/a18332e643d7cb83515627b693496fc0-applicationpdf

Chapter II is awesome

Go get money from Henry Ford

where are the masons oh? http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/712284090d61.jpg

You ever read Henry Ford's take on politics and economics?

Also Stalin received the lend-lease from capitalist America

A capitalist

Do you consider Stalin a capitalist?

No, that's diplomacy

>hurr he owned a company therefore he was part of the aloof bourgeois

Fascism=capitalism http://www.mediafire.com/file/yn15fvn5dnz8zry/landa_apprentice-1.pdf

Read

Oh so when your heros do it it's communism but anyone else is capitalist

No bourgeois in the USSR

under Stalin

>no bourgeois