international

Discord ID: 308950154222895104


752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 1501/7530 | Next

2017-09-11 23:13:58 UTC

gg

2017-09-11 23:14:03 UTC

Guess I'll change my ways

2017-09-11 23:14:07 UTC

And stop being a nazi now

2017-09-11 23:15:27 UTC

Now that my life is ruined and career is shot I guess the Jews aren't so bad after all, maybe we should accept them as our overlords. And I now think it's totally acceptable to let muslims in and bring sharia to my wife and daughter while I watch. Also, I have black friends now and I enjoy walking through housing projects because of the rich diversity! Thanks for helping me see the light

2017-09-12 01:20:09 UTC

Israel is National Socialist.

2017-09-12 01:21:12 UTC

Hmmm in a way.

2017-09-12 01:32:05 UTC

Nazis fur Israel

2017-09-12 01:32:22 UTC

This is why pan-Nationalism doesn't work. People get jealous when another people are more successful at your ideology than you. Like NatSocs getting jealous at Israel and jewish global control.

2017-09-12 01:32:40 UTC

omg

2017-09-12 01:32:44 UTC

stop being retarded

2017-09-12 01:33:13 UTC

Who are you calling retarded?

2017-09-12 01:33:27 UTC

No one should control the globe like that. At least not by Nationalist principles.

2017-09-12 01:33:39 UTC

Everyone deserves a naton, it's not an issue of being jealous.

2017-09-12 01:33:48 UTC

It's an issue that the Jews have no right doing it.

2017-09-12 01:34:07 UTC

Because we wouldn't, or at least shouldn't, do it if we had the chance.

2017-09-12 01:34:07 UTC

Assuming everyone just sits back and respects the NAP.

2017-09-12 01:34:17 UTC

Hell nah bruh

2017-09-12 01:34:35 UTC

it's not the NAP, you know I'm left and an authortarian. THe opposed

2017-09-12 01:34:51 UTC

Pan-nationalism depends on the NAP.

2017-09-12 01:35:09 UTC

A NAP between most all the nations of the world

2017-09-12 01:35:14 UTC

Yes.

2017-09-12 01:35:40 UTC

or at least a reletively restricted set of rules that stops unjustified war and annexation of non-native populations.

2017-09-12 01:36:11 UTC

I suppose you're right.

2017-09-12 01:36:24 UTC

Assuming people play by the rules, which they won't.

2017-09-12 01:36:42 UTC

There are incentives and pressures not to. Like competition or just natural disaster.

2017-09-12 01:37:25 UTC

Well, then we'll all just have to maintain strength and respect amongst us all.

2017-09-12 01:37:44 UTC

Sounds like Communism.

2017-09-12 01:38:12 UTC

Not really, this si between segergated peoples and nations.

2017-09-12 01:38:29 UTC

How do you not have rivalries between self-isolating peoples?

2017-09-12 01:38:53 UTC

Just don't?

2017-09-12 01:38:56 UTC

It creates in-group/out-group tensions.

2017-09-12 01:39:13 UTC

Okay. You just don't. Thanks.

2017-09-12 01:39:23 UTC

Pretty much.

2017-09-12 01:39:31 UTC

And if there ain't no chance of that. Well.

2017-09-12 01:40:14 UTC

Then war and the competition between states may be teh way. But at the same time that only aids the most immoral countries. Those that would expliot their folk.

2017-09-12 01:40:17 UTC

World is fuck.

2017-09-12 01:40:38 UTC

Now you're getting it.

2017-09-12 01:41:18 UTC

@Deleted User I've always got it, it just sucks to do so

2017-09-12 01:41:20 UTC

๐Ÿคท

2017-09-12 01:41:24 UTC

World is fuck.

2017-09-12 01:41:38 UTC

Dark sky without stars by night, blidning sky by morn'

2017-09-12 01:41:42 UTC

you believe in the nap?

2017-09-12 01:42:04 UTC

Between nations, but it isn't really viable when i think about it.

2017-09-12 01:42:28 UTC

**Evolution, ain't that a bitch**

2017-09-12 01:42:51 UTC

it isn't viable at all

2017-09-12 01:42:58 UTC

it is just the build up of pressure

2017-09-12 01:43:07 UTC

to create MAD

2017-09-12 01:43:20 UTC

MAD?

2017-09-12 01:43:29 UTC

Mutualy assured destruction

2017-09-12 01:43:45 UTC

๐Ÿ‘บ

2017-09-12 01:44:00 UTC

Weapons of mass destruction held by both sides, and both will use them if you push the envolop too far.

2017-09-12 01:44:10 UTC

Would God intervene?

2017-09-12 01:44:23 UTC

depends on ur definition of god

2017-09-12 01:44:23 UTC

The world is meant to end by blaming fire.

2017-09-12 01:44:26 UTC

*flaming fire

2017-09-12 01:44:35 UTC

You're getting me moist.

2017-09-12 01:44:38 UTC

I don't see why God would stop it, unless it was not time.

2017-09-12 01:45:02 UTC

F I R E A N D F U R Y

2017-09-12 01:45:06 UTC

Realistically speaking, the anti-Christ is either already in power or gaining power

2017-09-12 01:45:15 UTC

I doubt that.

2017-09-12 01:45:26 UTC

The end is coming faster, faster every day. So, world is fuck

2017-09-12 01:45:40 UTC

~~Donald Trump~~

2017-09-12 01:45:53 UTC

People have been talking about the End Times for 2000 years, as if it was just around the corner. It is not going to be now.

2017-09-12 01:46:05 UTC

๐Ÿค”

2017-09-12 01:46:07 UTC

Maybe you're right

2017-09-12 01:46:14 UTC

nothing we can really do if it does come

2017-09-12 01:46:17 UTC

it's God's will.

2017-09-12 01:46:23 UTC

blaming donald trump?

2017-09-12 01:46:36 UTC

I was joking that he was the anti-Christ

2017-09-12 01:47:09 UTC

ah i see

2017-09-12 01:47:13 UTC

excuse my autism

2017-09-12 01:47:41 UTC

The thing with End Times though, is that they always have prophecies to go with it. If they story does not fit the reality, what did the story really predict? Anyone can see that one day the world would end. But what does religious mythology contribute?

2017-09-12 01:48:13 UTC

What does it? It helps us draw the paterns that are very real.

2017-09-12 01:48:25 UTC

>A so-and-so bad person will rise to power and destroy as all.
That's pretty generic.

2017-09-12 01:48:39 UTC

There's much more then that.

2017-09-12 01:48:50 UTC

He will *decieve* us.

2017-09-12 01:48:56 UTC

This is going to get nuts.

2017-09-12 01:49:12 UTC

Said the leaing Christian deist

2017-09-12 01:49:36 UTC

Not really.

2017-09-12 01:49:49 UTC

I'm thinking about the implications, right now.

2017-09-12 01:49:58 UTC

**Shrug**

2017-09-12 01:50:16 UTC

I want to believe in God, but its just so nuts, intellectually.

2017-09-12 01:50:36 UTC

Religious mythology guards against the nihilism that the recognition that there is an end causes

2017-09-12 01:50:56 UTC

@bread#0708 I agree with this.

2017-09-12 01:52:54 UTC

But it's really hard to guard against something that you know is rational.

2017-09-12 01:53:36 UTC

Aquinas tried his best to salvage the rational aspect of religion, but his arguments are based on Aristolean logic. Not the most empirical methodology.

2017-09-12 01:53:58 UTC

well that presumes that there is only value in what you do that is everlasting

2017-09-12 01:54:16 UTC

the finite effect of something shouldn't impact if it has any value or meaning

2017-09-12 01:54:38 UTC

im not sure if nihilism is rational

2017-09-12 01:55:49 UTC

Value and meaning is a separate thing to the material universe. It's a subjective reflection, a physiological response. Nihilism is rational in an objective way, but not intuitively or experientially.

2017-09-12 01:57:01 UTC

These things can misfire. Like when you think God did something, but it is demonstrated and explained materially by mundane physical processes, like the Sun rising and setting in the sky.

2017-09-12 01:58:36 UTC

Religion has never providing more explanatory power than science, for instance.

2017-09-12 01:58:59 UTC

But science cannot hold in it absolute meaning like God can, which is why people keep going back to it.

2017-09-12 01:59:14 UTC

However it is rooted is physiology, not reason.

2017-09-12 02:01:14 UTC

The trauma of knowing that there is an end is severe. Maybe consciousness in the self-aware kind is an evolutionary mistake, and humanity is just a passing blip.

2017-09-12 02:03:17 UTC

This has been one of the solutions posed to the Fermi paradox. That any species who becomes sufficiently advanced to be self-aware always destroys itself being unable to deal with the existential dilemma.

2017-09-12 02:04:45 UTC

Biological evolution could very well be dependant on blind process and ignorance to succeed.

2017-09-12 02:07:37 UTC

we've had the knowledge of our own existance for thousands of years

2017-09-12 02:07:51 UTC

why do you think that it hasn't become destructive yet

2017-09-12 02:09:49 UTC

We have had the safety net of religion for thousands of years. But only recently has man become objective and rational enough as to realise the shortcomings of mythological explanations. And not even yet on a large scale, most humans still believe in fairy tales, which is the only thing between humanity and the abyss.

752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 1501/7530 | Next