Hell nah bruh

it's not the NAP, you know I'm left and an authortarian. THe opposed

Pan-nationalism depends on the NAP.

A NAP between most all the nations of the world

Yes.

or at least a reletively restricted set of rules that stops unjustified war and annexation of non-native populations.

I suppose you're right.

Assuming people play by the rules, which they won't.

There are incentives and pressures not to. Like competition or just natural disaster.

Well, then we'll all just have to maintain strength and respect amongst us all.

Sounds like Communism.

Not really, this si between segergated peoples and nations.

How do you not have rivalries between self-isolating peoples?

Just don't?

It creates in-group/out-group tensions.

Okay. You just don't. Thanks.

Pretty much.

And if there ain't no chance of that. Well.

Then war and the competition between states may be teh way. But at the same time that only aids the most immoral countries. Those that would expliot their folk.

World is fuck.

Now you're getting it.

@Deleted User I've always got it, it just sucks to do so

🤷

World is fuck.

Dark sky without stars by night, blidning sky by morn'

you believe in the nap?

Between nations, but it isn't really viable when i think about it.

**Evolution, ain't that a bitch**

it isn't viable at all

it is just the build up of pressure

to create MAD

MAD?

Mutualy assured destruction

👺

Weapons of mass destruction held by both sides, and both will use them if you push the envolop too far.

Would God intervene?

depends on ur definition of god

The world is meant to end by blaming fire.

*flaming fire

You're getting me moist.

I don't see why God would stop it, unless it was not time.