Ebin

West Asia could really use some gommunism right now

the whole world could

Yes

One could say that communism is much more appealing to non-industrialized nations, since communism is basically the hard way out of primary economy.

But West Asia and Africa specifically

Communism is most appealing to the agrarian societies and the highly automated ones, but not for the modern society that exists in between.

Afghanistan has huge economic potential

Which is why its occupied 😄

Lol

If England didn't have the Industrial Revolution at all, but some other country, England would have been commmunist / state communist at some point in history.

@Loser loser

oof

thanks for pointing out the obvious

You're welcome

Send ankle

Communism will win though and then we'll all be winners

ok

sir

Yes

We shall all starve equally

Po @Tatoes

no no no no

@Xinyue lol with that kruschev PFP it's unlikely

REVISIONIST

Lol

IM CALLING HOXHA

Communism may win in the next 5000 years.

Hey hey hey

HEY

Yes

IM REVIVING HOXHA

Get Hoxha

FROM THE DEAD

Khrushchev era USSR was USSR at its peak

And Mao

PRAY TO BREZHNEV, STALINIST

And Stalin

Ewwww

Brezhnev

no

Shut up Kruschev

Brezhnev is a saint.

dumb idiot revisionist

Sexy eyebrows.

```I have no argument```
- Loser, 2018

`the only thing i know is that i know nothing`

Maybe I should

Move to Russia

- not gay reddit 2018

I have no Argument and I Must Talk

@Spookaswa yes.

Sovnarkhozy reform was objectively a good thing

*This message was sponsored by Ministry of Tourism*

@Xinyue say that one more time and ill slit your wrists

damn revisionist

brezhnev is based

Sovnarkhozy reform was objectively a good thing

but stalin is better

I would rather be exploited by daddy Putin than some neoliberal or neoconservative faggot

@Xinyue wrong

Brezhnev literally began the bringing-back of capitalism though 😄

false

kruschev did

like he literally was the one who did this

I mean, Putin isn't exactly too trad.

Kosygin Reform of 1965

Better than what we have in America though

Kosygin reform is western propaganda

lmao 😄

All the worst problems of Russia came from the neoliberal invasion of 1993

But for real

everyone after stalin

garbage

it was still socialism, but it had become market socialism at this point

America is so liberal it makes me sick to my large Amerimutt stomach

Market Socialism with exploitation

<:lol:521377935672737792>

real socialist bro

NEP should have survived.

Market Socialism is still socialism though, it is just an inferior form

Dab on you all

No, it has exploitation and capital

Planned Economy or bust

^

Change my mind

Planned economy for the win

ok so i was typing up some notes

against revisionism

and

titoism

semi planned economy 👍

"The problem with market socialism is that while its proposals would, taken at face value, do away with the bourgeois-proletariat class distinction, it doesn't do away with capital itself, or the profit motive, capital centralization, or fetishization of commodities that comes along with it - the most problematic outcomes of capitalism. Basically, everyone becomes a capitalist and arguably becomes subsumed even more thoroughly into the market/commodity paradigm. Competition, not cooperation, is still the rule. Therefore i would compare that to surplus extraction and the creation of profit. Simply putting a factory in the hands of the workers isn't enough to change its status as capital. If the factory is still run under the competitive dictates of the market, the law of value still impinges on the workers as an external force, alienating them, driving them to decrease socially necessary labor time and increase productivity. The capitalist is, as Marx said, simply capital personified. In a free market "socialist" society, the collective of workers is itself the "personification" of capital. Not only that, but under such conditions labor-power must be a commodity! For, if labor power isn't a commodity, then the market cannot be regulated by the law of value, it cannot exhibit the supposed rationality or allocative efficiency." - My notes on revisionism

i am a cuck

Free market planned economy

^

> No, it has exploitation and capital

Socialism = worker ownership of the means of production

This is principle is still realised in MarSoc, so it is still socialism because the workers do manage their means of production. So you can't call it "un-socialistic", but you **can** and should argue that it is fundamentally non-viable