<:zoomer:639984566752509954> <:Gun:639978512207314973> <:boomer:639983474236850176>

No

Stretch

I made a meme

U like?

idk, lemme see.....

yes, very nice

Thank you

Damn this is surreal

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/30209571/

"If you cunts want to survive this, do exactly as I say.
After we enter the city, NO LOUD NOISES, do not ATTRACT ANY ATTENTION!
NO FUCKING IPHONES OR CAMERAS flashing through the car windows!
DO NOT MAKE EYE CONTACT with ghouls! (that's what he called [redacted])
And no matter what happens, DO NOT OPEN THE WINDOWS!
Because suddenly a lamp post can fall and block the way, and the ghouls will fucking siege us.
And remember that I have kids, so at least follow these rules for my sake..."

????

bugaloo?

Bugaloo means civil war right? That's not what the post is about but I don't doubt that it's a possibility in SA

or some sort of violent terroristic action

oh, this.....

yeah i've read this before

very interesting

Yes

@Vegan INTJ

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/index.htm

As for diversity and social cohesion putnam is by far the most cited

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x

Is the US too far gone demographically? Even with 0 immigration birth rates will make white people be a increasingly smaller minority either way right?

As a whole yes the US is demographicly doomed. Certain states and clusters of states are still salvageable though.

https://twitter.com/SpectatorUSA/status/1198023178574082048

fucking based

http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/guest-article-the-view-from-olympus-a-4gw-impeachment/

Honestly America is going to have a second civil war, and if it completely breaks apart into different states then I would expect more wars after that.

Anyway like I was saying the other day, I’m a irredentist, not a separatist

So if America does break apart I’m all for manifest destiny round 2

https://identitydixie.com/2019/11/22/myth-of-the-20th-century-bell-labs-the-idea-factory/

https://youtu.be/HIWzaFhdqIA

Oof

https://twitter.com/CptBlackPill/status/1198307713471660034

"A ponzi that never dumps" You think this shit could work lmao?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9aUrx_I9aI

he's not wrong

Yang gonna take Drumpft down, $1k at a time

@esotericpazuzuism sweden democrates are cucks

@Roko I don't have access the Putnam paper but from what I could gather from the relatively short abstract, the author seems to be largely in agreement with me, in that immigration, in the short run, impinges on societal cohesion and trust, but that in the long run, there are benefits to immigration, namely economical, and cultural ones.

@Roko Can you directly link me to the study on the number of sexual partners and marital stability pls?

@Vegan INTJ
I linked to the surveys from which the data was collected. I'm not aware of a study on the issue. Also putnams conclusions don't really explain how or why he believes that in the long run it will be fine

In fact i think he sat on his findings for something like 6 years before publishing because they disturbed him so much.

@Monstrous Moonshine what book is that from

why is carl back

@Roko

And oh btw, here is the right pic

Women with 6-9 partners were in some years more likely to be divorced than those with 2 partners

So I don't think promiscuity in and of itself is that much of a big deal

It might just that women with certain issues tend to be more promiscuous. For example, women with a lower IQ might be more promiscuous, and low IQ increases chance of divorce

Charles Murray went over this briefly in his bell curve I think

Sure i think that definitly plays a part. The type of person who would engage in lots of extramarital sex would intuitively seem to be less suited for a long term relationship. But it's also possible that pair bonding becomes increasingly difficult with more partners.

Can you link to that article you screencapped

https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability

@Monstrous Moonshine What book is that page from?

Anything for profits [or growth rates].

No wonder the West is facing trouble

>Record-breaking GDP growth
>Cost of living skyrocketing
Oh my god, I just love it here.

Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance by Guillaume Faye

@Ed @Leaf

https://www.youtube.com/user/serpentza/videos

So, I've watched a lot of videos from serpentza about China. For the most part he doesn't specifically talk much about ethnic nationalism but if you watch enough videos you start to get a bit of a feel for the general stance on ethic nationalism in China and it makes me not want to live in an ethno state.

Living in a country with limited or no immigration, fine. Living in a country that is a majority white, fine. But I wouldn't want to live with a bunch of degenerates obsessed about race.

The dude shares stories about things like a foreigner getting beat up for trying to stop a crime, because a foreigner is basically seen as worse than a criminal. The people in china would rather side with some degenerate thief who's chinese than a foreigner stopping a crime. If you don't want him in your country fine, kick him out. But don't turn a blind eye to degenerate criminals just because they are your own race.

change my mind? lol

@Str3tch Exactly, immigrants help the economy

no

@Boniface Different Races different ethics. But there may not be so much mind to change in the first place

I mean on paper I get it. Mass immigration and demographic replacement seems like shit. But every xenophobe I run into seems like a degenerate. Not like they are sexual deviants, more like they don't seem to have a firm grasp of reality and mastery of themselves. I wouldn't want to live in a country filled with these people.

"xenophobe"

They remind me of transgender activists who seem to think that gender is the most important thing in society and they think their obsession with gender is perfectly normal and healthy and society has to adapt to it.

where do you live?

Canada, why?

I mean xenophobe in a technical sense, someone who doesn't favour outsiders. I'm not trying to be sensationalist.

do you believe the freedoms afforded to you by laws that are enshrined will remain say if canada becomes, oh, i dunno, 40% muslim?

the usa is not going to last

because of immigration

the us constitution will be dissolved

maybe 100 years from now

I think the freedoms afforded to me by laws are already being stepped on by the government.

yes, and it will get worse

as diversity increases

so why "favour" outsiders?

your founding documents were made by people with certain genes

for a population of certain genes

An outsider doesn't need to be living in your country or having children.

there's no reason to have faith that other populations will respect or appreciate that way of ife

I think mass immigration is degenerate but when I see someone treating people like shit just because they are a different race that also seems degenerate. 🤷‍♂️

well, there's no reason to be rude and nasty to people..... 😄

it doesn't really help anything to get personal

Them not appreciating that way of life is dependent on the assumption that culture is heritable. Is there any proof for this?🤔Canadian identity can be reformed for it to be more inclusive of people of colour..

I work in an asian restaurant. I get along really well with the younger, more metropolitan asians. But the old school ones basically treat me like shit just because I'm white.

culture is heritable

culture comes from genes

And its like dude, you come to my country, and you are upset that I'm white?