This article is hilarious

@Lemai_Zucc Imagine supporting free democracy and free markets

gtfo capicuck

im a libertarian but to an extent

imagine supporting genocide and state control

Replace the trash state with a good one

@Lemai_Zucc free democracy is dumb. Autocracy is better.

Democracy ends up serving the rich, not the people

meritocracy is best

democracy isnt the endgame

its a WIP

Putin is skilled, so he should be in charge.

democracy can be changed to fit different purpouses and some aspects of democracy can be taken away if nessecary

I support technocracy over democracy.

Rule by specialists is better

bruh

i support populism

>meritocracy

cringe

cringe

cringe

people in government should be people representing people, not interests

*interest groups

Specialists represent good ideas. They are skilled, so they know what works and what doesn't. If you're a populist then you can have people vote on a list of candidates if you really want.

@Lemai_Zucc

except most people arent specialists and arent in touch with their ideas

Meritocracy is fucking stupid

Representative republics are flawed with corruption

yes but some people are specialists, so appoint those people @Lemai_Zucc

Only direct democracy is in the name of the people

Only takes into account skill and not other considerations

Like moral values, greed, etc

@Deleted User it's good as an economic system.

direct democracy is best democracy

wrong

still inferior to technocracy

technocracy has the same problems I just listed

a technocratic fascist

thats a major fucking oxymoron

not really. Corporatism is all about technocracy. Why can't a technocrat be a fascist?

@Lemai_Zucc

idk

do whatever you want

be a fucking posadist for all i carer

@Lemai_Zucc no seriously, why can't a technocrat be a fascist?

I'm curious

ok fine, they can. because nazism is just an interest group for white people. and technocracy is all about interest groups

A fascist can't be a technocrat because technocracy implies you only need to be strong in one area to lead. Fascism is about natural law, which dictates that the strongest will always rule when nothing is interfered with; and being the strongest requires being strong at all relevant areas, not just being skilled at your labor but also your morals, intelligence, values, etc.

one can be moral, inteligent and have good values whilst being primarily skilled in one area.

@Lemai_Zucc Fascism is an interest group for whatever nation it is in, but within a nation there are several interest groups.

>Can be

Can be isn't good enough

Fascism guarantees this is the case

Technocracy doesn't

you can have a society where people are appointed on skill and they keep morals and such in mind. That would still be a technocratic society.

Fascism is an idealist ideology for repressed homosexuals

Become Nazbol

Mussolini was no repressed homosexual\. That man was a complete chad

Fascism is no more idealist than national bolshevism @Shiba Inu

I'm a materialist

and no, not the materialist you low iq heathens are thinking of

I am the complete opposite of an idealist

Materialism is cancer

^

the spirit of man is important

Nazbol is retarded because communism preaches that everyone is equal while fascism literally says natural law dictates this as not the case

They are not compatible ideologies

@Shiba Inu how is fascism idealist and you are not?

materialism is contradictory in so many ways

@Deleted User Define materialism

"a tendency to consider material possessions and physical comfort as more important than spiritual values." @Shiba Inu

Being a miserable fucking degenerate who enjoys hedonistic bullshit and wastes his life chasing material pleasures instead of having a fucking soul or life worth remembering

no lol

@Deleted User @Deleted User You're both wrong

@Shiba Inu that's the generally upheld definition but ok.

You're referring to a different definition, not philosophical materialism @Deleted User @Deleted User

Meaning

lol

@Deleted User The first one is correct

philosophical materialism is contradictory in many ways

1a

oh. Philosophical materialism is just thinking matter is the only thing which is real.

Yes

dog just say that's what you mean at the start

"and no, not the materialist you low iq heathens are thinking of
I am the complete opposite of an idealist"

That's hardly clear but ok. I disagree with philosophical materialism as well.

@Deleted User The Soviet Union was one of the most materialistic nations in history and was far less hedonistic than its western adversaries

That definition of materialism is just scientific fact you retard

philosophical materialism is still gay.

Philosophically materialist countries*

It has nothing to do with philosophy

I'm not getting into the autism of it being a philosophy or not

but it is rejected by a lot of idealists

@Shiba Inu the Societ Union wasn't a nation

I don’t feel like arguing right now, I’m tired

because of "feelz not realz"

holy shit what an astute observation mr sherlock holmes

anyone with a brain knows this

You'd be surprised how many fascists don't have a brain then