Message from @Lemai_Zucc

Discord ID: 615327939256647711


2019-08-25 23:28:53 UTC  

>meritocracy

2019-08-25 23:28:54 UTC  

cringe

2019-08-25 23:28:54 UTC  

cringe

2019-08-25 23:28:55 UTC  

cringe

2019-08-25 23:28:59 UTC  

people in government should be people representing people, not interests

2019-08-25 23:29:33 UTC  

*interest groups

2019-08-25 23:29:56 UTC  

Specialists represent good ideas. They are skilled, so they know what works and what doesn't. If you're a populist then you can have people vote on a list of candidates if you really want.

2019-08-25 23:30:27 UTC  
2019-08-25 23:31:05 UTC  

except most people arent specialists and arent in touch with their ideas

2019-08-25 23:32:19 UTC  

Meritocracy is fucking stupid

2019-08-25 23:32:22 UTC  

Representative republics are flawed with corruption

2019-08-25 23:32:31 UTC  

yes but some people are specialists, so appoint those people @Lemai_Zucc

2019-08-25 23:32:32 UTC  

Only direct democracy is in the name of the people

2019-08-25 23:32:38 UTC  

Only takes into account skill and not other considerations

2019-08-25 23:32:43 UTC  

Like moral values, greed, etc

2019-08-25 23:32:56 UTC  

@Deleted User it's good as an economic system.

2019-08-25 23:32:56 UTC  

direct democracy is best democracy

2019-08-25 23:33:11 UTC  

wrong

2019-08-25 23:33:12 UTC  

still inferior to technocracy

2019-08-25 23:33:29 UTC  

technocracy has the same problems I just listed

2019-08-25 23:33:32 UTC  

a technocratic fascist

2019-08-25 23:33:47 UTC  

thats a major fucking oxymoron

2019-08-25 23:34:48 UTC  

not really. Corporatism is all about technocracy. Why can't a technocrat be a fascist?

2019-08-25 23:34:52 UTC  
2019-08-25 23:35:28 UTC  

idk

2019-08-25 23:35:35 UTC  

do whatever you want

2019-08-25 23:35:47 UTC  

be a fucking posadist for all i carer

2019-08-25 23:36:24 UTC  

@Lemai_Zucc no seriously, why can't a technocrat be a fascist?

2019-08-25 23:36:29 UTC  

I'm curious

2019-08-25 23:37:26 UTC  

ok fine, they can. because nazism is just an interest group for white people. and technocracy is all about interest groups

2019-08-25 23:38:05 UTC  

A fascist can't be a technocrat because technocracy implies you only need to be strong in one area to lead. Fascism is about natural law, which dictates that the strongest will always rule when nothing is interfered with; and being the strongest requires being strong at all relevant areas, not just being skilled at your labor but also your morals, intelligence, values, etc.

2019-08-25 23:39:00 UTC  

one can be moral, inteligent and have good values whilst being primarily skilled in one area.

2019-08-25 23:39:51 UTC  

@Lemai_Zucc Fascism is an interest group for whatever nation it is in, but within a nation there are several interest groups.

2019-08-25 23:42:04 UTC  

>Can be

2019-08-25 23:42:18 UTC  

Can be isn't good enough

2019-08-25 23:42:29 UTC  

Fascism guarantees this is the case

2019-08-25 23:42:33 UTC  

Technocracy doesn't

2019-08-25 23:43:18 UTC  

you can have a society where people are appointed on skill and they keep morals and such in mind. That would still be a technocratic society.

2019-08-25 23:43:24 UTC  

Fascism is an idealist ideology for repressed homosexuals

2019-08-25 23:43:29 UTC  

Become Nazbol

2019-08-25 23:44:01 UTC  

Mussolini was no repressed homosexual\. That man was a complete chad