ok fine, they can. because nazism is just an interest group for white people. and technocracy is all about interest groups

A fascist can't be a technocrat because technocracy implies you only need to be strong in one area to lead. Fascism is about natural law, which dictates that the strongest will always rule when nothing is interfered with; and being the strongest requires being strong at all relevant areas, not just being skilled at your labor but also your morals, intelligence, values, etc.

one can be moral, inteligent and have good values whilst being primarily skilled in one area.

@Lemai_Zucc Fascism is an interest group for whatever nation it is in, but within a nation there are several interest groups.

>Can be

Can be isn't good enough

Fascism guarantees this is the case

Technocracy doesn't

you can have a society where people are appointed on skill and they keep morals and such in mind. That would still be a technocratic society.

Fascism is an idealist ideology for repressed homosexuals

Become Nazbol

Mussolini was no repressed homosexual\. That man was a complete chad

Fascism is no more idealist than national bolshevism @Shiba Inu

I'm a materialist

and no, not the materialist you low iq heathens are thinking of

I am the complete opposite of an idealist

Materialism is cancer

^

the spirit of man is important

Nazbol is retarded because communism preaches that everyone is equal while fascism literally says natural law dictates this as not the case

They are not compatible ideologies

@Shiba Inu how is fascism idealist and you are not?

materialism is contradictory in so many ways

@Deleted User Define materialism

"a tendency to consider material possessions and physical comfort as more important than spiritual values." @Shiba Inu

Being a miserable fucking degenerate who enjoys hedonistic bullshit and wastes his life chasing material pleasures instead of having a fucking soul or life worth remembering

no lol

@Deleted User @Deleted User You're both wrong

@Shiba Inu that's the generally upheld definition but ok.

You're referring to a different definition, not philosophical materialism @Deleted User @Deleted User

Meaning

lol

@Deleted User The first one is correct

philosophical materialism is contradictory in many ways

1a

oh. Philosophical materialism is just thinking matter is the only thing which is real.

Yes

dog just say that's what you mean at the start

"and no, not the materialist you low iq heathens are thinking of
I am the complete opposite of an idealist"

That's hardly clear but ok. I disagree with philosophical materialism as well.