lmao

Oh shit that's savage

What do

I want to make a bot that tweets out every twitter moment with the caption "Who fucking cares?"

Kek

I'm bored 😩️😩️😩️

Read The Bible <:chad:402359917819985931>

Already do

I mean NOW

I want to get a haircut today

Go get a haircut then

I have no car

RIP

And the place I go to is not close

Feels and not having A car anymore

Poorfag

Lately women have been pissing me off

They love to play the victim card

I imagine they wpuld

Women always piss me off

Not having a car and all

What did he mean by this

Having a car is an immediate +999 on women

I lost it when a w*man hit my car

I lost it when I hit a w*man with my car

Lost my sides

That is

<:chad:402359917819985931>

<:chad:402359917819985931>

<:chad:402359917819985931>

If you didnt immediately 🅱ape her you only have yourself to blame for allowing the tyranny of female motorists to continue

True

Grape

Gape

👀️

Oh wow

I thought you meant a nsfw image

U virgin

<:virgin:402360028528377868>

The Chad Virgin vs The Virgin Fornicator

Heh

Sometimes I get temptations to just hate fvck a random thot, but I control myself

Temptations are to be expected

As long as you dont act on them you're good

Yes

satan tempts everyone, it's on us not to give into them

Very true

I can't even mess with other girls either way because I have a new girlfriend now

Nice

She's Italian

Congrats dude

Since all the white girl's in jersey are Italian

Med GFs are best GFs

Yes

She looks something like this

Congrats bro, I'm happy for you

I hope it works out

Meds are some of the least pozzed whites out there

Looking for Med or Polish gf

Thanks

Mmmh

Polish girls

The thing is, my girlfriend, I kinda had her on the back burner for a while,

She liked me but I was trying to go for another girl that I was talking to and it didn't go anywhere

If she wasn't in a relationship while you were with that other girl, that's a sign she'll be loyal to you

That's good

She was single, she was waiting for me to go take her out

Orbitted me

Damn

I gave up with the other girl because she kept playing games and I have no patience for time wasters

She also tried to pull the "lets just stay as friends"

Oof

I cut her off

She's done for

She also had guy friends

Oh yeah that's a bad sign

These guy friends were friends since like kindergarten

I was not going to have that

A thot since she was a toddler

Yes

I could tell that her guy friends were major orbiter's

Trying to find an opportunity to slip into the cracks and date her

But yeah I dumped her, no point in chasing a thot who plays games with you

Yeah

If she's not fit for marriage, there's no reason to keep the relationship going

And now I'm with an Italian girl who's Catholic. The other girl was a Protestant lmao

boof

The eternal pr*testant thot

A girl who's into the more devout sects of Christianity is a must for me tbh

I will not date a protestant woman

Same

Protestants let a lot of shit slip when it comes to The Bible and what it says

Yeah, you also have the prot thots

That's where it comes from

"Only God can judge me"

Yep

Did you see the guy Nick retweeted? The fucking gall of this bastard to mention God

Let me check

@RetardO ExtremeO I'll tell you more once I'm done with my showrr

@Bloat MOGG Not seeing it, can you link it?

Yeah which tweet?

He must have deleted it

owned

He retweeted this black degenerate who had just graduated and celebrated the fact he had 9 STDs, slept with 200+ women, had an assault/murder charge and some other sick stuff and then said he’s a Howard alum so God has a plan for all of us

Nick said “class act”

Taking the Lord’s name in vain

I used to have a habit of that but I kicked it

Feels good man

A good way to tell if someone takes their religion seriously is to see how they treat The Lords name

https://twitter.com/crashremastered/status/995064970600747013?s=21

I think I've realised that women ARE the problem

Trust women, get done in

RT

How the hell does one have 9 stds

Thats like

All of them

muh diq

that's how

Nigga u ded

Herpes + big HIV + syphilis = 1 dead boye

The fags have bolstered the aids cocktail industry to the point where you can live with super aids and still be alive as long as you take your HIV/AIDS/SUPER CANCER cocktail

Not to mention potential hepatitis

Yup. Live against god. Get your bugman bug. Be permanent slave to (((big pharma)))

Natural disaster? U ded

Extended civil unrest? U ded

Mutation of virus? U ded

Ban HIV medication

Fall of world order? U ded

Fags are an EXTREMELY protected class in the west

Society has made sodomites beyond reproach by nature itself at this point

"Buh muh jahb protection" "the geighs are persecuted in da weest"

It's because like a fag, the Jew is naturally effeminate. They have a shared culture in that way.

Bitch you hear people use mistreatment of gays as a call to war on fox news

The people who support and give in to the faggot worship are equally at fault with the people who push it

Gives me conniptions

We has to go to wars against the muzzie saudis cuz they no treats the homos rite

Tbh most mainstream right wingers oppose muslim immigration because "muh gays!"

Instead of any other valid reason

Or "my womens rights"

^

Yep

All they conserve is liberalism

Trotskyist s

Traditionalism and conservatism without the tradition and conservation of Christ and His Church is just the tradition and conservatism of what facilitated the issues we have today

"True freedom is working 16 hour days for the zog machine, goy! Don't forget to buy our latest products!"

If you have any right wing freinds who are pro gay show them the Pozitivity by mister metokur

That and anything by Common Filth

Tumblristas for those who dont have the time to sit through a podcast

I need to readup on more christianity but alot of the preached teachings of jesus are amazingly neoconservative in nature.

Read The Bible, read Aquinus

The Sam Hyde Brooklyn stand up is pretty red pilling too

And hilarious

It was pretty genius

Sam has a way with comedy

Redpills in here are almost useless imo. We dont meed redpills we need blackpills. And some who are down need whitepills

Fuck doods im going to sleep

Goodnight

I cant stay awake

Me also

Also, we need to stop using this slang, it trivializes the issues in my opinion

The meme terms do more harm than good

Oíche mhaith chairde

The Protestant work ethic and it's consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

Yes

@RetardO ExtremeO uwu

Ok so

I'm here

owo whats this

this place is dead

i wonder why

https://i.redd.it/srmqe6euqbx01.png

Because the frequent posters were rekt

Don't worry. I'm still here.

Just had a boomer tell me he is redpilled and doesn’t like the “tolerant left”

How long before you think he mentions Ben Shapiro and the intellectual dark web.

what is the intellectual dark web

wait till he brings up chemtrails

Who here knows about the aristotelian proof for god's existence?

Of course.

What about them?

Just wanted to understand it a little better

I'm researching aquinas' arguments because I'm an atheist

and I'm just looking for proof otherwise

What I'm having trouble with here

Same tbh

Even though it is high grade, even for most Thomists, Metaphysics ought to be a must-read for any apologist.

Is understanding why the "god" in a sustaining series of causes isn't also subject to an infinite regress

Like I understand that there's a difference between linear and hierarchical causes

But what gives the "unmoved mover"different qualities here

or why

The Angelic Doctor utilized Aristotelian proofs constantly. I'd really recommend getting into the foundations via Metaphysics. But, to get to your point, the primary issue that Aristotle posits depends also on the nature of substances, you know. Like the nature of the natural world via one that isn't natural and is not bound by natural law, but instead is the promulgator of said law.

So the fact that it exists outside of natural law is the reason it cannot itself be caused?

Well, Aristotle posited that as a first mover, in this case, God, He is outside "natural impulse" and is therefore good.

Unless of course even He is a secondary "mover" and someone was even above Him.

The primary aim to grasp is the necessity of the mover itself.

And just to clear up the jargon there, being outside "natural impulse" means that he is not subject to the law that everything must have a cause?

And i've heard people use the term "good" in theology but I'm not sure what it means in that context

grrrr stop having a complex discussion on theology christcucks!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leK2WkAHLYk

He is not subject, per se, as He was the cause itself. However, His acts as first mover is necessity for the secondary cause. In other words, without the movement, there would be no secondary cause.

Without His act, there would be no result. This said as He created the Natural Law, how then could we say He is bound by it? If one is extra-natural, how then can one be Natural?

That makes sense

But what I'm not understanding is why this argument is any more convincing than the argument that there is no plane outside of the natural world and there is just an infinite series of causes

From a Thomistic perspective, infinity in the Natural world is implausible.

And not to go down the road of science, but I'd say that is also decently held to be the same in that field.

Can you enlighten me on why infinity is not possible from that perspective?

Wasn't aquinas willing to concede that it is possible that the linear cause of the universe could be infinite just for the sake of argument?

Well let us go back to Aristotle, he posited correctly with regards to his rivals the Pythagoreans, that "objects of sense" (i.e. Nature) cannot be infinite. How can there be an infinite amount of causes in a natural world? How could something naturally exist forever? If this isn't the case, how then could something come from nothing without an extra-natural act by something unnatural?

The Angelic Doctor conceded plenty, however he felt with regard to this that the only way that could be is if God had always and infinitely was with the universe, but he certainly didn't accept that notion, and I don't find it well grounded in Thomism.

True

which is why i said he just did it for the sake of his argument

But my answer to your first message

I hold him in extreme esteem, but in some matters he was repudiated by the magisterium. Example being, the Immaculate Conception.

would be that as far as I know mass/energy can't be created or destroyed

Not naturally.

right

So if it can naturally exist forever

isn't it plausible that it has always existed forever?

Lofi Hip-hop to study and beat minorities to

And I apologize that I'm not very well educated in this field

But I promise I'm arguing out of good faith here

Again infinity has largely been discredited as, for lack of a better word, paradoxical and illogical. Even physicists have deemed it so. Example being Georges Lemaitre, university of Louvain in Belgium.

No need to apologize.

I'm still learning about what Aristotle meant by the difference of potential and actual infinity.

Mathematic theory isn't my strong suit, but I love how he related the two, it shows his general brilliance if anything.

So is this infinity in concern to the passing of time or is it everything?

Infinity, being never ending, not expanding either. So this particular infinity deals with all of creation which is guided and defined by time.

No infinity has not at all been discredited by physicists

I never said all of them.

I simply gave examples where it has been.

Where?

George Lemaitre, one of the theorists behind the theory of the big bang, seen here.

You realize even the most basic calculus relies on infinities

Almost every branch of physics that we even study in undergrad has infinities within the theory

Infinity in theory or infinity in practice? That is, infinity for hypothesis, or infinity with regards to metaphysics?

That question doesn’t really make sense

And I'm not colluding the two, I'm simply saying is infinity being used for theoretical purposes or for actual explanations of the natural world?

Help me understand as you do.

Actual explanations

GR is the best example

It requires no discrete lengths in space or time basically so that you can for any given curvature in space create a locally “flat” thing called a spacetime metric

To do that the world has to be continuous in time and space, so infinitely divisible

It’s really analogous with epsilon delta I think it’s callled from calculus one. Which is why infinities are also required there

I understand the necessity of it, but I fail to see how this correlates with infinity with regards to creation? While I certainly hold no credentials, and that should be apparent, how does this figure into the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi model?

I mean how can accelerated expansion be believed in an infinite understanding?

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the model.

Let me look that up tbh I haven’t heard of it. Are you saying howncould they theorize that the universe expansion is accelerating indefinitely?

The expansion of the universe, and the theory of it, seem to contradict the idea of an infinite universe. I mean, how could infinity expand infinitely? That makes no sense.

Oh the ltb metric is inhomogenous which our universe isn’t

Again that's why I brought up Lemaitre and Edwin Hubble, that was their bread and butter