how many jewish people were living in germany who had nothing to do with "jewery" got slaughtered just because they dont like foreskin and wear funny hats?

idk, I wasn't arguing about that.

Luke 11:21
When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are safe;

But you stated that NatSoc as an ideology does not work.

It very clearly made them a mighty nation.

what im saying is most socialist states if not all socialist states have all had genocide or attempted genocide in common

and mighty nation or not

killing people *without reasonable justification* is evil

Sure.

I think most people can agree with that.

and socialist states have a tendency to genocide people

I'm not arguing on all of socialism.

But pretending that NatSoc's are the same or similar to Sanders is a very, very far stretch and frankly silly.

and yet i feel like it will yield similar results

And I'm not NatSoc, but I think just about anyone thats looked into the actual ideology can see that.

Yeah I think people take the “Socialism” in National Socialist and blow it out of proportion

generally involves stealing in theory and murder in practice

the only national socialist state to ever exist did both of these things

im not overblowing anything

They stole?

no they left the houses of dead jews alone in the same state they were when they were occupied

Those homes rightfully belonged to Germany though.

Say what you will for the mistreatment of the Jews, Germany is for Germans.

>private property rightfully belongs to the government

oh man

*hmm*

that's a thought process i guess

He’s got a point

>that private property rightfully belongs to the people of that nation

Our banks should not be controlled by the likes of the Jews.

Yet they are.

Our media should not be controlled by the likes of the Jews.

Yet they are.

🤔

Say what you will, a nation for all is a nation for none. In a family home, people have their own rooms, their own property. Yet not just anyone is allowed to walk in and have a room for themselves.

interesting that jewish people in almost every nation they've occupied have been forced out of "real work" because "jews cant handle it" and that's how they end up with directing jobs and banking jobs

you can't just violate private property because someone is suddenly not ethnically native enough to live

No, they naturally gravitate towards banking because it is very easy to accumulate wealth through shrewd manipulation of currency rather than actual work.

Like a true parasite.

🤔

The rights of private property do not supercede the rights of the people to their own nation.

so you're saying it would be totally fine to take houses and land from black people in the united states?

No, special circumstances have made that a difficult question to answer in a morally acceptable fashion.

but jews in germany are different?

However, if Chinese were to begin purchasing excessive amounts of property and power for themselves, then yes.

As they already are on the West Coast, by the way.

🤔

You constantly do this thinking face but I think you simply have a misunderstanding of what the nation is.

It is not a work camp for anyone.

the greater good is more important than autistic-tier NAP libertarianism

Not a super company.

It is a family.

i generally do thinking face when im actually taking time to think about what you're saying before i respond instead of responding instantly

Ok my bad then.

I just took it as a sort of sarcastic remark, no worries.

the nap is fucking gay

i just think that if someone buys something, it's theirs

I can agree with the whole idea of private property shouldn’t just be taken for reasons like ethnicity, but @TraitorGG has a point

Then the nation can be sold to the highest bidder, surely?

The nation is for its people

why is the highest bidder not the nations own people?

If Bill Gates went and started buying property of his own in Japan, and after he died it just remained his, that just wouldn’t be right

because the nation made the mistake of letting jews in, probably

There should be no "highest bidder" at all. The nation is the nation.

why do jews have more money than germans in germany?

if "the nation is for the people"

Because they naturally gravitate towards banking, like we've said.

Feel free to look into the history of individuals like Soros.

yeah yeah i know about all that

Controlling currency allows one to control far more than they should.

A frankly sickening amount of power, honestly.

i don't really see myself as debating you right now as i do trying to solve a really weird problem

Thats fine.

This is how people change their ideas and grow upon them.

Friendly discussion my dude.

also that "there should be no highest bidder" thing spooked me

Why's that?

sounds like communism shit

Do you think someone should be able to buy the nation?

no one person aught to be doing better than another

I simply took what you said and bloated it to a point that you surely should have to disagree unless you are a very, very libertarian individual. Should someone be able to just purchase the United States if they have the necessary funds?

No matter how impossible that amount to get, lets say someone hypothetically has accumulated enough wealth to do that. Should they be able to?

given that a person powerful enough to actually do something like that exists

yeah but mainly because the US is a joke country now anyway

which is your circumstance

i don't see why they shouldnt

Oof.

200 years ago, absolutely not

Well we disagree heavily then.

imagine someone having the funds in hand to buy every square foot of american soil

i mean like gold bars not mason papers

i would LOVE for someone to buy the federal government

and no one, not a single other person or even group of people were able to topple that man

then yeah

accelerationism.erection

let him purchase every square foot

one by one

although

we aren't really talking about someone buying a country

Are you a libertarian individual?