Rubins are getting more expensive with their ammunition these days

gonna repost that to <#598763932194177024>

lol, why do people criticize titania, obvious troll account <:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

oh how times change.....

<:comfort:592107824826417204>

what did they mean by this

on another note

/pol/ is going at a speed of 200000 posts/day

I shudder to imagine 4chan as a whole

Nobody:
Poland:

it's good shit lemme tell you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CashAq5RToM

>norton

I just wonder. Are you pro or against it?

what

I'm not trying to advertise an YouTube channel!

nortan is an antivirus

it's infamously shit

I was just commenting

I just wonder do you approve bulletproof hosting or do you think a hosting serves should have at least some measure of RESPONCIBILITY about what goes around their cyberspace?

e.g. I mean should it all be free for the taking as long as you have the money to pay in for the service or should you be liable by law if someone hosts real evil stuff at your servers and you do nothing at all to prevent it?

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/wfIxWpoyMB-YGWZHlEq_ntmeIJ2kzfJy0gSkrK1qeQE/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/601960693327200286/alright_campers..mp4

ancap says pay up for protection and you can host you're cp all you want

but

IDK

I kinda agree with ancap tbh

Thought I wouldn't lol

not the CP part

that was just a meme

tfw no ancap gf

I'm kind of wondering about that Internet dilemma myself-who should be fighting the Internet battles of today-the legislation and the police trying to find out who the "good guys" are or the users should be fighting their own battles for themselves?

That dilemma at the end of this YouTube video made me really think.

If you watch it you would see that the hosting provider was hosting both some ISIS websites and anonymous fighters trying to shut them down.

I don't like lawboomers coming in and ruining a natural system that's still in development with out of date and out of touch policies that sterilise the internet

I mean if a provider is hosting ISIS sounds bad, but their are also people using the same server to identify and expose the terrorists, so I don't see the real need to bring in the government

I was just wondering what was the right thing to do fro your perspective-let them fight each other over the virtual space and figure out who is better-ISIS or the anonymous or make the provider liable for what gets on his servers?

I mean if we go down the Absolute freedom Path, then we could legalize virtually everything-child pornography, terror guides, ultimately sick horror stories, direct threats to anyone and anything and God knows what sick nightmares people can come up with, too.

nah

You just need people to out them

report them to the police and shit

you just don't look into it yourself

But if we start making companies liable for what is on their servers, than we can really be responsible if some really sick control freak starts censoring opinions as he pleases.

But what about the material @Muten ?

You can't criminalize something if it isn't a problem, so long as that material isn't posted online it doesn't need to be exposed

If someone gets to jail for posting something nasty should the material be banned off the Internet, too, or should it be allowed to circulate as long as there is anyone willing to download it?

well the thing is that anyone can go on the internet

so the government doesn't need to be offically legislated to go on and find this shit themselves if they feel ever so inclined

By that logic people can download tons of terrorist manuals, brutal killings, child pornography and God know what nasty stuff and just get away with hosting them as long as they are not the ones who actually made them at the first place.

Well the thing is that we already have laws about that stuff

they are only safe for as long as they can remain anonymous

and it's getting harder and harder to become let alone remain anonymous

https://youtu.be/Ng18p-88C-g

http://is2.4chan.org/vg/1563676516296.png

1944 out of 10 would fuck the nazi party

he does have a point with "ban plastic straws, but not the plastic containers or anything else"

They banned straws to prop up their friend's that were mass producing the replacement.

nah, i think it was actually just pointless virtue signalling

what the fuck is that red thing

@ebinmemes22 it's a shitty gun lock

*its also a urethral sounding thing*

And how is it shitty?

easy to break/pick?

Yes

You can shim em pretty easy as well

If someone got access to your gun... gun lock won't be a hindrance to them

Unless that lock is on the proper gun safe

No shit

But a safe should be where your gun is

What I see gun locks be useful for is to prevent your noob offspring from shooting said gun if they happen to find it

Well that really depends

Most kids can get into gun locks

You should have taught em not to touch firearms without permission.

Most gun locks are free and useless

Kids are curious

I've seen some decent ones for vehicles, but they are still easy to pick

What?

Better be safe than sorry about a dead kid

Yeah that's why you have a safe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcP3KP1UnXQ]

@Iain_an_séú As a hobby lockpicker I can tell you that 99% of locks are easy to pick

Hey me too

I love locksport

Even the most namebrand locks are sometimes extremely easy to pick, just because assembly line puts a randomised bidding into them

That means - some locks will be randomly very-pick-friendly

Yeah and most companies don't use security pins