>norton

I just wonder. Are you pro or against it?

what

I'm not trying to advertise an YouTube channel!

nortan is an antivirus

it's infamously shit

I was just commenting

I just wonder do you approve bulletproof hosting or do you think a hosting serves should have at least some measure of RESPONCIBILITY about what goes around their cyberspace?

e.g. I mean should it all be free for the taking as long as you have the money to pay in for the service or should you be liable by law if someone hosts real evil stuff at your servers and you do nothing at all to prevent it?

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/wfIxWpoyMB-YGWZHlEq_ntmeIJ2kzfJy0gSkrK1qeQE/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/601960693327200286/alright_campers..mp4

ancap says pay up for protection and you can host you're cp all you want

but

IDK

I kinda agree with ancap tbh

Thought I wouldn't lol

not the CP part

that was just a meme

tfw no ancap gf

I'm kind of wondering about that Internet dilemma myself-who should be fighting the Internet battles of today-the legislation and the police trying to find out who the "good guys" are or the users should be fighting their own battles for themselves?

That dilemma at the end of this YouTube video made me really think.

If you watch it you would see that the hosting provider was hosting both some ISIS websites and anonymous fighters trying to shut them down.

I don't like lawboomers coming in and ruining a natural system that's still in development with out of date and out of touch policies that sterilise the internet

I mean if a provider is hosting ISIS sounds bad, but their are also people using the same server to identify and expose the terrorists, so I don't see the real need to bring in the government

I was just wondering what was the right thing to do fro your perspective-let them fight each other over the virtual space and figure out who is better-ISIS or the anonymous or make the provider liable for what gets on his servers?

I mean if we go down the Absolute freedom Path, then we could legalize virtually everything-child pornography, terror guides, ultimately sick horror stories, direct threats to anyone and anything and God knows what sick nightmares people can come up with, too.

nah

You just need people to out them

report them to the police and shit

you just don't look into it yourself

But if we start making companies liable for what is on their servers, than we can really be responsible if some really sick control freak starts censoring opinions as he pleases.

But what about the material @Muten ?

You can't criminalize something if it isn't a problem, so long as that material isn't posted online it doesn't need to be exposed

If someone gets to jail for posting something nasty should the material be banned off the Internet, too, or should it be allowed to circulate as long as there is anyone willing to download it?

well the thing is that anyone can go on the internet

so the government doesn't need to be offically legislated to go on and find this shit themselves if they feel ever so inclined

By that logic people can download tons of terrorist manuals, brutal killings, child pornography and God know what nasty stuff and just get away with hosting them as long as they are not the ones who actually made them at the first place.

Well the thing is that we already have laws about that stuff

they are only safe for as long as they can remain anonymous

and it's getting harder and harder to become let alone remain anonymous