uk_politics
Discord ID: 622430298746912768
177,160 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 402/1772
| Next
```Completed: 4
Scrapped: 4```
```Fate: Sold for scrap in 1955
Status: Scrapped```
```Completed: 2
Scrapped: 2```
Nah, they could just take of backwards.
Not enough headwind
```Fate: Scrapped 1978```
It's a fucking biplane, how much headwind do you need?
I suggest the Sopwith Camel as a low cost alternative
Anything positive, which isn't what you'll get if you keep moving the ship forward but take off backwards. ```Fate: Scrapped 1980```
```Planned: 4
Cancelled: 4```
```Planned: 2
Cancelled: 2```
```Completed: 3
Scrapped: 3```
Better scrapped than blown up, like most US non-Essex main battle WW2 carriers
At least that's a warrior's death. Enterprise got scrapped, but other than that we bothered to actually save ships.
Or, in the case of USS Constitution, keep it in active commission in the US Navy and keep the ship sailing under her own power 200+ years later
Somehow I don't think the military planners are of the same opinion
as far as warrior's death is concerned
They actually do, because if you keep ships as museums, there exists a possibility to return them from the mothball
Anyway, contrast USS Constitution with HMS Victory, the latter of which looks like the ship's on fucking life support: https://www.nmrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/styles/event-image-large/public/field/image/how_adjustable_steel_props_will_look_on_hms_victory_credit_nmrn_2.png?itok=A074yAfu
I was referring to the "warrior's death"
not that armoured carriers make sense nowadays....
That idea of preferring a ship be sunk than scrapped dates back nearly 200 years on this side of the Atlantic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Ironsides_(poem)
American "history" lmao
No such thing
He says as the UK scraps would-be historical sites, while the Old Statehouse in Boston still stands from the days of the Boston Massacre
I love how Yanks get so proud of the frigates like the USS constitution when their navy was literally just those 3 frigates
6, though the real thing to be proud of is the 33-0 battle record on Connie
HMS Shannon hoves into view
Yeah the constitution was a really good design, but not good enough to hold a candle to the RN of the time
It was successful enough to outrun what it couldn't outgun or outgun what it couldn't outrun, and indeed as shown by the 57-hour chase involving 5 smaller Royal Navy ships, they could even outrun ships that were SUPPOSED to be able to outrun them
Basically the interwar UK battlecruiser doctrine
Yeah it was a fine ship, but there is a mystique around those ships that aint really justified
They DID pull experimental designs that proved to work, like the diagonal braces in the hull
e.g a really well managed RN frigate like the Shannon managed to beat the USS Chesapeake
Otherwise, they didn't, and weren't designed to, compete with ships of the line
hence their speed
and razees were shown to handle them well
They only did so well because the cream of the RN were in Europe dealing with Napoleon
presumably being manned by the sailors the UK had to impress into service due to lack of domestic manpower
which is the biggest reason the US even got involved to begin with
I mean they probably wanted a land grab in Canada whilst Britain was distracted
and used impressment as an excuse
That was a minor factor among those who wanted to expand, which was still a comparatively fringe idea by that point given that the Louisiana Purchase was only made a decade prior
One attempt was already made at ~~Canada~~ British North America in the Revolutionary War, in which the southern Quebecois were sympathetic, but the northern Quebecois were less interested, to say the least
You can tell how significant impressment was as a factor by the fact that a Quasi-War was also started with France, which by this point had no further territory within American reach
That was the one led by Monrgomery if i remember right
TL;DR, don't fuck with American ships
Fucking with American ships in various capacities was what led the US to get involved in the War of 1812, the Spanish-American War, World War I, and World War II
Yeah dont fuck with American ships or you may have to come and burn the capital city down
And then retreat in the face of an overwhelming American force of literally nobody
because **ANNUIT COEPTIS**
I mean Admiral Cockburn was an absolute lad
And the tornado-spawning hurricane that tossed British artillery and damaged ships while putting out their fires was an even bigger lad
Went to the office of a newspaper that chatted shit about him to take all their letters so they couldnt print his name
Then spend the night working his way through the neighbourhood's women
As god himself destroys the rest of Washington DC
Nah, that storm saved the city
extinguished the fires, expelled the invaders, and allowed for its reconstruction from the burned stone up
'expelled the invaders'
It forced a retreat
They left because they had already drank through the presidents wine supply
It had tossed artillery, damaged British ships, killed some British soldiers, and forced a retreat
It is god's way of nerfing the British
too OP otherwise
It's **ANNUIT COEPTIS**
Nodding in appreciation of the British efforts
yes
The US actually de facto gained some territory out of the War of 1812
by occupying what are now the Mississippi and Alabama panhandles, which were purchased in the Louisiana Purchase but which Spain claimed weren't, and they remained occupied until Spain ended the territorial dispute by selling us the entirety of Florida a few years later
I mean occupying Spanish territory was all the rage in that period
And it would continue to be so until the US beat them down in 1898
KNOW YOUR PLACE, TRASH
Spain is genuinely the worse colonising European nations
The Dutch looks amazing in comparison
Yup, it shocked me reading accounts comparing the US to Spain in the Philippines and Puerto Rico, just how hard Spain either neglected or actively fucked over their possessions
tbf Napoleon fucked them over badly
and it was a downward spiral from there
```In 1929 Worcester wrote of Americans giving Manila a modern sewer system, supplying city dwellers with "comparatively pure drinking water" and wiping out diseases such as small pox, cholera and bubonic plague. Worcester wrote of skilled medical and surgical services being sent to the Philippines. He wrote about teaching boys and girls "the elements of good sanitation," about overcoming Filipino prejudice against hospitals, about new care for lepers and a more humane care for the insane "who were previously chained to floors or posts." Girls, he wrote, are being taught to cook and to sew, and boys are learning woodworking, ironworking and other useful trades. And he wrote of the US policy of denying liquor to tribal peoples.```
```Worcester boasted of the US-inspired economic advances in the Philippines, of road building, an improved mail service, more and better wharves and harbors for inter-island and international shipping. He spoke of the need for improvements in the rice industry in the Philippines, for better irrigation and better seed selection. He spoke of lifting the Filipinos out of "primitive production methods" in its sugar industry, without which, he said, the Filipinos will not be able to compete successfully in the world's sugar market. And he criticized US sugar interests for conspiring to prevent advances in the Filipino sugar industry.
Worcester boasted of the US giving the Philippines "religious liberty, free speech and a free press." He wrote of a determined US effort to break up slavery and peonage, something he claimed the "easy-going Spaniards" had never done. He wrote also of the all-Filipino legislature, which he described as premature but a blessing nevertheless. Worcester favored going slowly toward independence but he saw its eventuality. "Both of our great political parties," he wrote, "are committed to the policy of granting independence when the Filipinos are ready for it."```
did they vote yet?
on?
Yeah even if you hate the British empire at the very least they were massively anti-slavery
When they weren't building Confederate ships and harboring their ships and terrorists, at least
Annoying the Yanks is top priority, even if it means siding with slavers
looks like theyre about to announce the results of the vote
this will be fun
ORDER
329 yes
299
nos
the timetable?
Oh right, so they approved the deal, but not the timetable
I am taking that is a bad thing if they don't approve the timetable?
That's what I was wondering
Apparently if this vote passes, the UK will be out on the 31st
LOCK THE DOOOOOORS
308-322
The noes have it
ORDEeer
So what does that mean?
177,160 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 402/1772
| Next