Have you looked up demographics for the southern united states?

They're not exactly white states, LOL

you're thinking of the midwest

I never said purely areas?

I said rural regions

Regardless, this is off topic

The fact that you believe minority groups lack empathy for majority groups arguably says something.

May I ask, why do you feel this way?

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

What are your thoughts on Senator Joe Manchin?

Who

stop with this

why are we asking US centered questions?

is this a US server?

European politics are more relevant

Nobody cares who the cheeseburgers vote

smh

yes it is american

He's a democrat who said our most recent SC member should've been instilled

@SilverLining

I just said, because I live in a "vibrantly diverse" area and I have firsthand experience with these people.

Im British

You don't really have to do anything to them for them to act like pieces of shit, it just sort of happens by itself.

This is suppose to be a euro server

no

I’m an American

But the owner is a Slav

No

the owner is a slavophile

And most politics happens in Europe

America has shitty politics

I manage the server and i'm originally from Maine

D r u m f is the only spicy part

Maine

Ehh

Even more boring then the average American state

Beautiful terrain, lush fields, breath taking foliage

only slightly democrat

great governor

Pretty sure every state has fields, and beautiful plants

And pretty sure half the states have republican governors

like two thirds

“Diverse areas” are more liberal from a combination of stockholm syndrome and racial out group retaliation fear. Ie, in group racial preference is taboo and social repressed.

Joe Manchin is a more sensible Democrat than most of his colleagues

Not much else to say about him

Also @Da_Fish it is two thirds @L0GAN

America has shitty politics

Not much else to say about it

I would use the term less exciting

Two parties that every switch power every few years and stay moderate on almost all topics

Yes it's quite boring

Before Trump the most exciting it got was on social issues

There was a sharp increase in tensions between the parties recently though

Pre Trump and Post Cold War is super boring

Nixon was spicy

Only thing pre trump I found exciting politically was the rise of the tea party

Nixon was quite an interesting thing in our history

The tea part movement, aka thou who aren’t retarded

Tea Party is cringe

“Let’s not collapse our country in crippling debt”

How so? @The Big Oof

It was good

too boomer-y

Well Boomers were the majority of voters then

So of course it would be

It was kinda anarcho capitalist, but with the goal of re establishing constitutional goals and undoing our crippling debt

I thought the Tea Party was great in helping inspire more libertarian thought in the party

Libertarianism is gay

Libertarianism is life

Time to kill myself then

Go commit crusty veins

why copy and paste the rules?

Whoops

I am ex-staff anyway

I meant to paste only rule 8

I wanna fuck with josh

What channel are we in? @🅱oomer Ted Cruz

Question of the Day

"Not addressing someone's argument and then saying they are [racist, xenophobic, sexist, etc], or using ad hominem in <#452955229227319306> is idiotic and will get you deported."

This rule does not apply

Oh shit nvm then

*Autism Moment*

Saying something is gay shouldn't even be deportable anyway

I mean if you derail a serious conversation multiple times I would agree with that

Well it wasn't de-railed, I was about to give my explanation for not liking it, and then you posted the rules @🅱oomer Ted Cruz

Also >multiple times

You mean once?

I wasn't saying you derailed it O was giving a reason I would be ok with seeing someone deported over it

I see

Apologies then

Its ok

I should have worded it better

But please continue

I don't like libertarianism because it fosters a culture of nihilism and results in a short sighted world view, where your interests come before that of your countrymen

>supports mob power

Not mob power

but there absolutely should be class collaboration

Libertarians are some of the biggest supporters of charity and humanitarian work. They just recognize all human interest is self interest. You do not help others for others sake alone, but for your own as well.

(((Class collaboration)))

Libertarians are not against class collaboration

Alright, what sort of experiences?

And why do you believe said experiences should reflect upon an entire group who hold nothing, sans not being born in America OR as a white American, in common?

Are you talking to @The Big Oof

?

Yes

Or anyone, really

Also you might want to revise the question

Also, why do you presume the sole factor is birth region/skin color itself?

Well I can tell you from personally living in a ghetto and near ghettos most of my life, a large majority of latino and black minority groups are criminal, lazy, immoral, and anti American, but there are exceptions, exceptions who I have made friends with and kept in my personal life.

I do not believe race and region are the sole factors in their behavior, but influence it

We know this from DNA data showing those minority populations have higher rates of incest which lead to unfavorable genes

"anti-American" and "immoral" are incredibly subjective

Arguably criminal, too

"Lazy" is subjective, and even then, more of a personal judgement

Would you consider sexually promiscuous, uncaring for their children, and a general lack of regard for others immoral

You're asking people their personal experiences, so of course they will give a subjective response @SilverLining

I mean, I live in a ~60% non-white city, I'm fine with that - Most people here are decent

I’d say better terms is they are aggressive, do not follow the law, and fail to be successful

Sexual promiscuity, no

Not caring for children, yes

@SilverLining First off, this isn't exactly a small "sample size."

Secondly, given their crime rates, their attitudes in general, and various other things, it's safe to assume most (not all) are like that

A general lack of regard for others, depends on who the "others" are, but yes

Here we go agian

Anyone is others

using "their"

treating groups as monoliths by and large

I think your problem is you have it in your head that we don't believe there are exceptions to the rule

Not really

No one is saying all of them

Or else why whine about the monolith

You're looking at exceptions and casting them as the majority

Unless the criminal rate is above 50%

that's exactly what you're doing

This is false

I said they were more criminal on average

not all of them are criminals

The crime rate is disproportionately high for their population

Not even most of them are criminals, in fact

emyia, at least

Never said that either

said, quote

"a large majority of latino and black minority groups are criminal, lazy, immoral, and anti American"

Well i didn't, and he probably misspoke

I said in my personal experience

I encourage the anti-American bit, to be fair

In ghettos

And only ghettos

Ghettos being economically impoverished regions?

Yes

Okay

Shitty people tend to be more criminal, doesn't mean all or even most shitty people are criminals

And you're saying that, outside of ghettos, minority groups don't exhibit those traits?

Right, emyia?

or

Don't exhibit them to the same degree**

I am not saying that, I am only speaking on my experiences. As for outside of these areas I dont full well know but I do know they have disproportionately high crime rates for being such a small part of the population

In suburban communities, as the one I now live in these traits I have found less common

But I have only lived in three suburban areas

Suburban communities being more economically prosperous

I cant speak for all

Yes

So you're saying that said traits are found commonly within impoverished regions

but not as much in more affluent locations

More or less

While also saying minority groups are often more economically troubled than majority groups

Considering disproportional representation in poorer demographics

Do you believe class could be a factor?

And if so (or even if you don't, honestly), have you ever considered the economic history of minority groups?

I do believe it can be a factor

I never said race or location was the only factor

Or of lingering societal attitudes, even to this day (albeit de facto, rather than de jure), which might contribute?

I said the opposite

Yep I can agree to that as well

"have you ever considered the economic history of minority groups?"

Hungary is far poorer than blacks in the United States

*as a nation

Hungarians are not that criminal

Okay? The GDP overall is lower

and income

and standard of living

and income, true

standard of living, sure

But presumably

Eastern Europe as a whole is

that applies to all communities within the region

We can probably replicate the same thing in Asia

Sans maybe a few oligarchs, everyone's not doing terribly well

East Europe is a shithole is what he is saying

And in Asia I can name a ton of countries

As opposed to a rather rigid class divide

Or at least, a more substantial one, wherein a fair portion are left in the dirt while a middle class is commonly available, thriving at the expense of the poor

Doesn't really make sense. The last time I checked, it doesn't matter why or why you don't have access to certain resources, what matters is if you do or not. Sounds like a cop out

I'm not implying that it's why or why not you don't

Minority groups have more access to resources than ever

^

I'm attempting to imply that due to the whole nation being poorer, that's seen as status quo

rather than disadvantaged

And of course, everyone does

This is the way technological progress pushes us

Saying "things are better" doesn't mean "things are okay" or "things are acceptable"

"I'm attempting to imply that due to the whole nation being poorer, that's seen as status quo
rather than disadvantaged"

Doesn't really change anything

it does, though

Not really

Minority groups are disadvantaged by their own cultures, I know cause I was in them

How does that explain the criminality of black people?

Attitudes towards society as large

As well as larger support networks

Anyhow

I'm gonna do some other stuff now

bye

Ok bye

Jews...

were shunned from society

and they do better than other ethnic groups

@SilverLining

And they are faring the best

Asians, too

East Asians, rather

Out of a groups

<--- East asian master race

west*

praise Allah

@Deleted User

Albanians>everything else

To be fair, many East Asian nations are doing terribly

and those which aren't did suffer, but are finally rebuilding

/have rebuilt

As for Jews, they were forced into particular trades which, by chance, happened to actually be fairly profitable later on

I've told it several times before, but Jews were generally forced into prestigious trades (merchants, lawyers), which would actually be profitable later on

and not as dishonorable

thus, actually serving as a boon, somehow, in the long run

Anyone here know a guy named "Irish N Angry"?

He got Shoahed.

Has a image of The Blueshirts.

How the fuck

You think east asians are top tier?

Northern asians litterally made the biggest empire ever

East asians lost all the wars

lmao imagine not being a khanate supporter in current year

@SilverLining
"To be fair, many East Asian nations are doing terribly
and those which aren't did suffer, but are finally rebuilding"

Not really terrible in terms of intelligence, no. Even those on the lower end like Thailand still aren't that bad, and some white countries like Argentina even score that low. When they come here, they and their children have higher average incomes than whites and are less criminal than the average native population.

" by chance, happened to actually be fairly profitable later on"

Pretty sure they managed to make it profitable and it wasn't by chance. They were seen as dishonorable positions

Japan managed to keep it's people fed while Jewsevelt + Churshill Sanctioned it.

Whereas China was internally unstable.

Still managed to hold The E. Indies + Korea.

And fucked the Bongs at Hong Kong.

Not really, the dishonorable positions actually became fairly powerful industries. I mean, with the advent of new technologies,copyright law is bound to make quite a bit of money, while industrialization (and thus, a greater need for loans to obtain capital) were likewise useful.

relatively similar

The minor differences could probably be accounted for by relative national stability and national inequality

Also, I would like to ask... How do you account for the fact that the IQ in what we now call the developed world has risen ~15 points, a full standard deviation, within the past 100 years?

The problem with the Asian IQ measurement is the fact they don’t account for the undeveloped areas

Ah, that's a good point too