Message from @The Big Oof
Discord ID: 500823166843879437
You're looking at exceptions and casting them as the majority
Unless the criminal rate is above 50%
that's exactly what you're doing
This is false
I said they were more criminal on average
not all of them are criminals
The crime rate is disproportionately high for their population
Not even most of them are criminals, in fact
emyia, at least
Never said that either
said, quote
"a large majority of latino and black minority groups are criminal, lazy, immoral, and anti American"
Well i didn't, and he probably misspoke
I said in my personal experience
I encourage the anti-American bit, to be fair
In ghettos
And only ghettos
Ghettos being economically impoverished regions?
Yes
Okay
And you're saying that, outside of ghettos, minority groups don't exhibit those traits?
Right, emyia?
or
Don't exhibit them to the same degree**
I am not saying that, I am only speaking on my experiences. As for outside of these areas I dont full well know but I do know they have disproportionately high crime rates for being such a small part of the population
In suburban communities, as the one I now live in these traits I have found less common
But I have only lived in three suburban areas
Suburban communities being more economically prosperous
I cant speak for all
Yes
So you're saying that said traits are found commonly within impoverished regions
but not as much in more affluent locations
More or less
While also saying minority groups are often more economically troubled than majority groups
Considering disproportional representation in poorer demographics
Do you believe class could be a factor?
And if so (or even if you don't, honestly), have you ever considered the economic history of minority groups?
I do believe it can be a factor
I never said race or location was the only factor
Or of lingering societal attitudes, even to this day (albeit de facto, rather than de jure), which might contribute?