well she did post a pic and i couldn't reverse search it on google

@Deleted User @Euro-American Bandit

sadly she was banned and it was erased

from hopps

not on this server

in hopps realm

What did they ban them for?

being a toxic commie and pissing off everyone on the server

10 days in a row

Real Anarcho-monarchist Gang hours

Anarcho-monarchism cannot be a real thing

@Swiss Cheese they could easily have pics from random girls

yeah but i couldn't reverse search it

on google

or in facebook or any of those

Ugh

If you have a private fb account

Google wont show your pics

nope its pretty public

sorry for late response

oh wait

i am dumb

miss read that

I have this one friend who believes in food redistribution as a method if preventing starvation.
Would this be achievable on a global scale?

No

A country needs to be self sustainingg

Because more food leads to more babies aka more demand for food

If you institute some program of redistribution it can end at any time for many different reasons

And then you have chaos and starvation when there is now a food supply crises. Its a really bad idea to mess with a nations food supply

@Da_Fish @Doctor Anon wtf

i dont support antifa but dont you think it ruins the point of the server to ban everyone of an idealogy just because theirs rumors a few of them are ddoxing on discord

why did you say this in OTD

Antifa == Usually iolent scum

we don't want that here

@L0GAN wasn't my decision you little cuck

@Doctor Anon your the owner

you can undo decisions

Consuls have autonomy

Full autonomy

That's the point

let us vote on the consuls if we gonan give em power

no lol

pope back when he was staff was mocked for being libtarded

@L0GAN lol, if you get 30 people to agree to an election, I will hold one

do a poll in announcements

who wants an election

Republics dont last

that is a fact

^

democratic republics

no government lasts

@campodin all republics are democratic

republic refers to a representative democracy

@L0GAN how about we elect staff and staff elect consul

sounds good

eh

that would be more like parliament tho

no, republic is a mixed state by definition

a state in which supreme ***power is held by the people and their elected representatives***, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

Rome was better as an Empire

Senate became so corrupt

like every fucking republic

the us is different

our politics arent very extreme

and depend on centrist voters

@L0GAN each side likes to pit other side as extremists

Both are very moderate though

Republics are clown shows

That get nothing done and just bitch over who is right and wrong

(but then again its not like they have any interest in their politics other than personal gain)

And then leaving it up to people to vote which is a horrible idea

I feel like the reason democrats want illegal immigrants is the cheap labor that isnt the governments problem to fix

@☦Default™#1027

Did he leave

Ha

@L0GAN you are using are modern bastardization of the term republican. Originally it was meant to describe the mixed government.

Mixed government (or a mixed constitution) is a form of government that combines elements of democracy (polity), aristocracy and monarchy, making impossible their respective degenerations which are conceived as anarchy, oligarchy and tyranny.[1] The idea was popularized during classical antiquity in order to describe the stability, the innovation and the success of the republic as a form of government developed under the Roman constitution.

@campodin you said by definition

no definition of republic is mixed gov

It is a mixed government by definition

no

every single republic is a mixed government

thats a way to interpret it

but your doing this

"a republic has elected officials and an appointed or elected leader- a republic is a mixed gov- a mixed gov can be non democratic"

CAN BE

republics are always democratic

republics always have democratic elements

The term republic was first coined c. 500 BCE in Rome, but over time the term has undergone several changes in meaning. Initially the Latin term res publica signified the earlier "partial form of democracy" as found in Rome from c. 500 BCE until c. 27 BCE. In this early Roman partial-democracy, the power of the aristocratic or patrician class who held all of the seats in the Roman Senate, was checked by the institution of the consulship, whose two consul/vice-rulers were elected annually by the free citizens or plebes of Rome. The ancient Roman definition of the word differs from the modern use of the term, where no leadership positions are held to be restricted to only the "ruling class".[10][11]

in the case of appointed leader that refrences a parliamentary system

which is still democratic

In an old Republic there are positions you can only get by inheritance.

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 exactly. democracy, aristocracy, and oligarchy

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 in modern republic, there are positions the president appoints

Yes, but those aren't the same.

sorry not oligarchy, that is the same as aristocracy

More or less.

if everyone has the **ability** to become a member of the state, its a democracy

@Doctor Anon can you take me off the Polls rank

with the dictatorship, rome even included the "monarchy" aspect

@L0GAN would anyone actually run for a position in the server tho

@Doctor Anon i would

zexy probs would

Democracy is when you can get any title without inheritance.

a lot would

"do you want power in a big server"

I'll run.

@Classy Done

:U

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 thats not a democracy

Zexy hates this server Logan

Thank you

Are you mental

exactly

so shell try to destroy it

a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. @campodin

L0GAN the communist

Yeah no u ain't running

I was a stalinist first of all

and I ***Was***

i was more of a shitposter in the first place tho

Communist Cafe 2.0

it died

Hahaha

Of course it did

A Republic in the sense of Res Republica is a partial democracy.

I stopped tending to it

my staff are shit

Communism kills anything it touches

so it died

Because there are titles in the government you can inherit.

@Doctor Anon without a strong dictator

a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.

@L0GAN there are many republics with positions that are only inheritable or appointable

no

@L0GAN how many members at the time of death

i am here\

@campodin still a democracy

@Doctor Anon

if everyone has the ability to become a member of the gov, its democracy

Not everyone does.

@Default™ oof

In the sense of Res Republica.

Y say oof

Damn it's split <#452955204313153556>

lol no that is not democracy if there are parts of the government that are not influenced by democratic vote

@campodin is canada a democracy?

it is far too democratic

but it has a constitutional monarchy...

an inherited role

so...

by your logic

its not a democracy

It's a partial democracy.

the monarch is powerless

no

The power of the crown is governed by a leader appointed from the citizens of the country.

By recommendation of the PM.

Who is elected by Members of their party via general election.

what has the queen done to affect the governance of canada?

executive authority remains vested in the Crown and is only entrusted by the sovereign to their government on behalf of the people

like legit, the queen could start a WWIII at any time if she wanted

That's true

She is the commander of our military.

she has executive authority in a large number of countries

But the Governor general is the commander of the civilian government.

none of the former colonies are obligated to join in the war, as far as I'm aware

Which is an appointment by the crown via Parliament.

@campodin she has executive authority

theres this thing called the commonwealth

It's true, Camp.

when has she exercised it though?

The Queen can call Canada to war.

of course shed likely get overthrown if she started a WWIII but her being overthrown would likely cause it aswell

@campodin never luckily

but thats why im worried about the future of the commonwealth

if there IS another monarch, what if they went mad?

them being overthrown would cause a world war

them being mad would cause a world war

that's the problem, she is effectively powerless, and canada runs as an effective democracy

"Effective"

shes far from powerless

what does the potential matter for the current state of the nation?

I think Logan is just arguing her power is very real.

she just doesnt use it

it would be like a one time thing

because shed get overthrown afterwards but it wouldve already happened

Ultimately it would be up to the people if we heed the call, but the powers of the Crown are still very real.

and many would be loyal to her

pm's should be done away with. let the queen govern instead

She's far too old.

i know

and the royal family is becoming blacked

This PM should be done away with and allow somebody to rule in the interim until the next election.

having a monarchy with absolutely no opposition is idiotic

then they can start a world war 3, get away with it, and then do it again

what do you mean no opposition?

"let the queen govern instead"

she doesn't have absolute power

Well, it worked decently well until it became a Constitutional Monarchy.

magna carta, ever heard of it?

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 well when a king goes mad...

Seeing as the decline came after.

That's what generals are for?

@campodin magna carta doesnt say "queen cant start world war 3"

it just says she cant violate rights of her people

declaring war isnt violation

well, nothing is stopping her now according to you either

no thats nto what i said

i said she would get overthrown now causing ti to happen anyway

if she did it back then shed get away with it

"like legit, the queen could start a WWIII at any time if she wanted"

"of course shed likely get overthrown if she started a WWIII but her being overthrown would likely cause it aswell"

She could declare it

I don't know about start.

this all started because you thought the queen had no power

i said she does

and she does

her governing instead of pm, wouldn't change that

The Queen does have power.

shed have more power if she governed as pm

That's the fact of the matter.

Hahaha

because then shes the sole political and religous/celebratory leader

She would just be the Queen still

Not PM

I said get rid of pm

the pm is the political leader

Nah

PM is the guy that controls the civilians and Commons.

the queen is a celebratory leader with limited dictatorship like abilities

your talking about the prime minister right?

the prime minister has taken the place of the queen in the lives of uk citizens and the commonwealth

if he controls the citizens and gov, hes the political leader

not really

a single pm doesnt have executive power over all of the common wealth

maybe in the eyes of the uk

I think you mean monarchist powers.

but they still celebrate the queen

yeah, by queen I mean monarch

the crown

same thing

The Crown is Parliament

In Canada

Parliament gets its authority from the Queen.

And is thus referred to as the Crown.

ok, so in canada is the prime minister elected directly?

No

The PM is the leader of the party that is elected to office with the most seats.

And the Leader is elected by the members of the parties