Message from @campodin

Discord ID: 487735958184263680


2018-09-07 21:21:32 UTC  

@☦Default™#1027

2018-09-07 21:21:35 UTC  

Did he leave

2018-09-07 21:21:47 UTC  

Ha

2018-09-07 21:22:00 UTC  

@L0GAN you are using are modern bastardization of the term republican. Originally it was meant to describe the mixed government.

2018-09-07 21:22:17 UTC  

Mixed government (or a mixed constitution) is a form of government that combines elements of democracy (polity), aristocracy and monarchy, making impossible their respective degenerations which are conceived as anarchy, oligarchy and tyranny.[1] The idea was popularized during classical antiquity in order to describe the stability, the innovation and the success of the republic as a form of government developed under the Roman constitution.

2018-09-07 21:23:37 UTC  

@campodin you said by definition

2018-09-07 21:23:44 UTC  

no definition of republic is mixed gov

2018-09-07 21:24:06 UTC  

It is a mixed government by definition

2018-09-07 21:24:14 UTC  

no

2018-09-07 21:24:19 UTC  

every single republic is a mixed government

2018-09-07 21:24:40 UTC  

thats a way to interpret it

2018-09-07 21:24:42 UTC  

but your doing this

2018-09-07 21:25:23 UTC  

"a republic has elected officials and an appointed or elected leader- a republic is a mixed gov- a mixed gov can be non democratic"

2018-09-07 21:25:46 UTC  

CAN BE

2018-09-07 21:25:52 UTC  

republics are always democratic

2018-09-07 21:26:08 UTC  

republics always have democratic elements

2018-09-07 21:26:19 UTC  

The term republic was first coined c. 500 BCE in Rome, but over time the term has undergone several changes in meaning. Initially the Latin term res publica signified the earlier "partial form of democracy" as found in Rome from c. 500 BCE until c. 27 BCE. In this early Roman partial-democracy, the power of the aristocratic or patrician class who held all of the seats in the Roman Senate, was checked by the institution of the consulship, whose two consul/vice-rulers were elected annually by the free citizens or plebes of Rome. The ancient Roman definition of the word differs from the modern use of the term, where no leadership positions are held to be restricted to only the "ruling class".[10][11]

2018-09-07 21:26:46 UTC  

in the case of appointed leader that refrences a parliamentary system

2018-09-07 21:26:55 UTC  

which is still democratic

2018-09-07 21:28:27 UTC  

In an old Republic there are positions you can only get by inheritance.

2018-09-07 21:28:34 UTC  

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 exactly. democracy, aristocracy, and oligarchy

2018-09-07 21:29:01 UTC  

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 in modern republic, there are positions the president appoints

2018-09-07 21:29:12 UTC  

Yes, but those aren't the same.

2018-09-07 21:29:21 UTC  

sorry not oligarchy, that is the same as aristocracy

2018-09-07 21:29:33 UTC  

More or less.

2018-09-07 21:30:04 UTC  

if everyone has the **ability** to become a member of the state, its a democracy

2018-09-07 21:30:15 UTC  

@Doctor Anon can you take me off the Polls rank

2018-09-07 21:30:16 UTC  

with the dictatorship, rome even included the "monarchy" aspect

2018-09-07 21:30:20 UTC  

@L0GAN would anyone actually run for a position in the server tho

2018-09-07 21:30:35 UTC  

@Doctor Anon i would

2018-09-07 21:30:38 UTC  

zexy probs would

2018-09-07 21:30:40 UTC  

Democracy is when you can get any title without inheritance.

2018-09-07 21:30:42 UTC  

a lot would

2018-09-07 21:30:52 UTC  

"do you want power in a big server"

2018-09-07 21:30:58 UTC  

I'll run.

2018-09-07 21:31:00 UTC  

@Classy Done

2018-09-07 21:31:01 UTC  

:U

2018-09-07 21:31:05 UTC  

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 thats not a democracy

2018-09-07 21:31:14 UTC  

Zexy hates this server Logan

2018-09-07 21:31:19 UTC  

Thank you

2018-09-07 21:31:19 UTC  

Are you mental