Message from @L0GAN
Discord ID: 487741295796682772
"let the queen govern instead"
she doesn't have absolute power
Well, it worked decently well until it became a Constitutional Monarchy.
magna carta, ever heard of it?
@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 well when a king goes mad...
Seeing as the decline came after.
That's what generals are for?
it just says she cant violate rights of her people
declaring war isnt violation
well, nothing is stopping her now according to you either
no thats nto what i said
i said she would get overthrown now causing ti to happen anyway
if she did it back then shed get away with it
"like legit, the queen could start a WWIII at any time if she wanted"
"of course shed likely get overthrown if she started a WWIII but her being overthrown would likely cause it aswell"
She could declare it
I don't know about start.
this all started because you thought the queen had no power
i said she does
her governing instead of pm, wouldn't change that
The Queen does have power.
shed have more power if she governed as pm
That's the fact of the matter.
Hahaha
because then shes the sole political and religous/celebratory leader
She would just be the Queen still
Not PM
I said get rid of pm
the pm is the political leader
Nah
PM is the guy that controls the civilians and Commons.
the queen is a celebratory leader with limited dictatorship like abilities
your talking about the prime minister right?
the prime minister has taken the place of the queen in the lives of uk citizens and the commonwealth
if he controls the citizens and gov, hes the political leader
not really
a single pm doesnt have executive power over all of the common wealth
maybe in the eyes of the uk
I think you mean monarchist powers.