Message from @Default™

Discord ID: 487731907308683264


2018-09-07 21:05:10 UTC  

democratic republics

2018-09-07 21:05:10 UTC  

no government lasts

2018-09-07 21:05:24 UTC  

@campodin all republics are democratic

2018-09-07 21:05:38 UTC  

republic refers to a representative democracy

2018-09-07 21:05:46 UTC  

@L0GAN how about we elect staff and staff elect consul

2018-09-07 21:05:51 UTC  

sounds good

2018-09-07 21:05:56 UTC  

eh

2018-09-07 21:05:57 UTC  

that would be more like parliament tho

2018-09-07 21:05:58 UTC  

no, republic is a mixed state by definition

2018-09-07 21:06:20 UTC  

a state in which supreme ***power is held by the people and their elected representatives***, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

2018-09-07 21:06:41 UTC  

Rome was better as an Empire

2018-09-07 21:07:50 UTC  

Senate became so corrupt

2018-09-07 21:08:11 UTC  

like every fucking republic

2018-09-07 21:08:37 UTC  

the us is different

2018-09-07 21:08:46 UTC  

our politics arent very extreme

2018-09-07 21:08:52 UTC  

and depend on centrist voters

2018-09-07 21:10:07 UTC  

@L0GAN each side likes to pit other side as extremists

2018-09-07 21:10:14 UTC  

Both are very moderate though

2018-09-07 21:10:52 UTC  

Republics are clown shows

2018-09-07 21:11:19 UTC  

That get nothing done and just bitch over who is right and wrong

2018-09-07 21:12:28 UTC  

(but then again its not like they have any interest in their politics other than personal gain)

2018-09-07 21:13:19 UTC  

And then leaving it up to people to vote which is a horrible idea

2018-09-07 21:15:31 UTC  

I feel like the reason democrats want illegal immigrants is the cheap labor that isnt the governments problem to fix

2018-09-07 21:21:32 UTC  

@☦Default™#1027

2018-09-07 21:21:35 UTC  

Did he leave

2018-09-07 21:21:47 UTC  

Ha

2018-09-07 21:22:00 UTC  

@L0GAN you are using are modern bastardization of the term republican. Originally it was meant to describe the mixed government.

2018-09-07 21:22:17 UTC  

Mixed government (or a mixed constitution) is a form of government that combines elements of democracy (polity), aristocracy and monarchy, making impossible their respective degenerations which are conceived as anarchy, oligarchy and tyranny.[1] The idea was popularized during classical antiquity in order to describe the stability, the innovation and the success of the republic as a form of government developed under the Roman constitution.

2018-09-07 21:23:37 UTC  

@campodin you said by definition

2018-09-07 21:23:44 UTC  

no definition of republic is mixed gov

2018-09-07 21:24:06 UTC  

It is a mixed government by definition

2018-09-07 21:24:14 UTC  

no

2018-09-07 21:24:19 UTC  

every single republic is a mixed government

2018-09-07 21:24:40 UTC  

thats a way to interpret it

2018-09-07 21:24:42 UTC  

but your doing this

2018-09-07 21:25:23 UTC  

"a republic has elected officials and an appointed or elected leader- a republic is a mixed gov- a mixed gov can be non democratic"

2018-09-07 21:25:46 UTC  

CAN BE

2018-09-07 21:25:52 UTC  

republics are always democratic

2018-09-07 21:26:08 UTC  

republics always have democratic elements

2018-09-07 21:26:19 UTC  

The term republic was first coined c. 500 BCE in Rome, but over time the term has undergone several changes in meaning. Initially the Latin term res publica signified the earlier "partial form of democracy" as found in Rome from c. 500 BCE until c. 27 BCE. In this early Roman partial-democracy, the power of the aristocratic or patrician class who held all of the seats in the Roman Senate, was checked by the institution of the consulship, whose two consul/vice-rulers were elected annually by the free citizens or plebes of Rome. The ancient Roman definition of the word differs from the modern use of the term, where no leadership positions are held to be restricted to only the "ruling class".[10][11]

2018-09-07 21:26:46 UTC  

in the case of appointed leader that refrences a parliamentary system