Swedish is extremely easy to learn

Have a quarter of my family still there

Getting into Sweden would be pretty impossible

no family members close enough

also in this modern era culture is barely existant

far more difficult

I could fit in with fucking Turks if I wanted to

and that's a really bad thing

Exactly

an American in Sweden would barely stand out

where are you from garfield?

Burgerland

State of Pennswoodland

oof

Minnesota imo could be nice if it were split in half

I plan on moving to Occitan or Greek Macedonia

Yeah I don't really know how to get to europe yet

I had considered doing accounting

since it seems bearable

I'd hate my life if I were an engineer or computer scientist

Brb

Neither of you are Nationalists

Probably true

Maybe not in your sense, I prefer Tribalist

I think the genetic difference between Anglos and slavs is mostly negligible

Compared to groups of Asians and Africans, certainly

Europeans are made up of 3 different ancient groups

the Western Hunter Gatherers, the Ancient North Eurasians (also known as the Aryans), and the Ancient Neolithic Farmers

its wide enough for there to be a distinction. However, I myself prefer the historical-geographical slider of anglos-francs-germans-scandinavians-polish-slavs

the WHG were the people of most of Europe. the Aryans lived in Ukraine and Russia, and the ANF lived in the Mediterranean, Iberia, and Balkans

Ancient grugs came in many types

@Garfield Movie#643

The Aryans at this time had actually mastered bronzecraft

They were the ones who brought bronze, horses, and chariots to Europe. They also brought their religion and language

The ANF brought agriculture (obviously)

the WHG most likely were the creators of alot of ancient European pottery, clothing, hunting, fishing etc. Styles

Oddly enough there are almost no words that come from WHG languages

even stranger is that 'sword' could be one of the few

and the Aryans were the ones who invented swords

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C4JPMYHTZis&t=82s

great video on the Aryans

Ah yeah that guy is great, he sucks off varg a bit though.

They actually hate eachother

really?

I thought a year ago they were quite close.

They were never close, they kinda just had to associate with eachother for shared views

Golden One was the one who used to be Vargs friend

I myself am a fan of both, but i really disagree with Vargs genetic and religious views

his views on meds lmao

Vargs views are pretty memetier

STJ is eternally/myguy/

@Deleted User I like varg's blackpill stuff

Yeah that's good

Politically I agree with him

and lifestyle

@Deleted User
Can u dm my links to the channels you ar talking about?

sented

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

What is your model economic system? Do you prefer free markets or market regulation? Should all industry be privatized? Explain.

COLLECTIVE

Minarchy

Yes

ancap

Minarchy

Completely Free-market

Freemarket capitalism with islamic finance put in place

@warriorman8 The freemarket cannot exist with islam

Distributism with some syndicalism

You mean like the inability to sell vice

If that is the case just regular capitalism

@warriorman8 Are you actually muslim

Ye

Free market all the way

Is this

Bannable

Add to that the fact I'd make the currency backed by gold and silver to keep inflation in line

^^^

@warriorman8 No

Under sharia law currency has to be backed by gold

You also have to cut off the hands of thieves

and a woman needs two witnesses for a rape charge

There is such thing as a false rape accusation

Yeah

we know

@warriorman8 Mohammed was a pretty bad muslim

Let me get you the link

hold up

Where the link be?

@Da_Fish

hold up

Neo liberalism

Decentralized Syndicalism with an Agrarian focus, and a distinguishing between private property (property used to make profit, which can still exist but functions differently) and property owned by a family (homesteads, farms, ranches, etc)

Also decentralized to the point where you can build a house, start a business, etc. without getting the government's permission, but it will be disintegrated if you don't make any efforts to incorporate said industry's respective syndicate, violate laws, cause unrest or harm to the community and workers, etc

Think american libertarians but economically left

ayyyy, fellow dist/syndi @V-NAF_Aardist

whats up

@Alexander Ramsey Not a ton. Plotting my NatSyn revolt like usual

Yknow, "Long Live Rivera" and what not

Nice

capitalism with lots of regulations but no unnecessary state owned businesses

I don't like the idea of absolute free markets

I think that leads to mindless consumerism, and I think the average person is too stupid to look out for companies with bad intentions

^

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Is non-defensive military action/intervention ever justified? If so, under what circumstances?

No

Yes, anytime the USA sees it as fit.

Never

Possibly when genocide is taking place

INDIVIDUAL

Debatable at that case

@Froce is that all you say?

Uh

Yes, whenever the nation's interests are threatened

No no no

Absolutely. Human history is determined by the most powerful overcoming their weaker adversaries, and the fact that modern civilization does not do this is simply a temporary phenomenon. War is inevitable, as it is impossible not to threaten a nation's values at all indefinitely. This, and economic or political aggression by another country, when taken to the extreme, is potential for a retaliation

Offensive war can not be justified unless your allies are being assaulted unjustly

yes, it can

it can

lets say that a region occupied by one nation contains over 90% of your nation's citizens by nationality, and they are potentially being mistreated because of it

the nation becomes hostile when asked to remedy the situation

therefore a justification to claim that region by whatever means is justified

That just makes you a psychopath

you see, it is quite easy to tell when your neighbors, or anyone, is acting aggressive, whther it is to scare you or to literally invade you, armed conflict immidealty becomes an option. For example when Arab arms mobilized on Israel's borders in 1967 the Israeli's decided to make the first strike and bomb Egypts airforce bases to demobilize its airforce and get immideate air superiority, was it a dick move? yes but it kept it alive and that's all that matters.

hopefully my argument makes sense

I reject just war theory, so a nation can engage in military action for any reason under any circumstances

What if I told you that every time muhammad went to war it is always in response to enemy aggression?

I don’t think it is. I don’t think the well being of other peoples are necessarily our responsibility, but I doubt the long term benefits of military intervention.

It is **always** justified

AVE ROMA

i don't see how it's inherently bad

but people often tell me the irish during the latter half of the 20th century were somehow wrong for picking up the rifles to defend themselves

so you know

double standards

even tho it's sad to see human beings and their creations destroyed,war is always going to be there as long as nations have specific interests,which is almost inevitable

so I'd be in favor of countries fighting for their best interestes since going against it is beating one's head against the wall :T

Isolationism is what you need @Pino Sinatra

yeah,but how long will it last until the first asshole violates that principle and starts eating up other nations till it becomes too powerful to be stopped?

Isolationism dosent imply a weak army

Aggressive military action is necessary sometimes. But the current system can't be trusted with such intent.

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should there be a penalty for flag burning? If so, what, and why? Should people lose citizenship for it? What should we do with immigrants who partake in it?

No

COLLECTIVE

COLLECTIVE

Depends on what flag it is and what nation it is

No

EXECUTION FOR FLAG BURNING IN A DISPLAY OF DISSIDENCE

Absolutely there should be a penalty

Freedom of expression is necessary, you will still face social consequences however

I think an immigrant should lose citizenship, not sure about normal people, but maybe.

Freedeom of expression from the constitution

FUCK THE CONSTITUTION

Fuck you

but generally those who do it should be flogged. Immigrants should be flogged harshly

Fuck u fascist

Immigrants who do it should get deported

^

Those without citizenship who dislike their country could be deported as they will never assimilate

immigrant who does it should be deported, if a citizen does it, it should require permit just like another protest

Their new country

@Alexander Ramsey This tbh

@Deleted User And what about immigrants with citizenship who do it?

I stand by @Deleted User on this one

Does a piece of paper really mean anything?

They're equal to every other citizen

So yes

There has to be a legal basis for it

The native population should always have more rights than the immigrant population, imo

I don't think the majority of 1st generation immigrants can assimilate

Maybe if they are english speakers

@Deleted User deported

rip

They should make the effort so their children can

I believe that citizens doing it are fine as it is part of freedom of speech but immigrants or people who are from other origin should get cheked and marked with "has openly spoken against the nation" or something which would pretty much be a "watch out for this person" mark for organizations and companies and stuff.

They won't go 100%

But they can get close

But if they form little paki towns or china towns that's a problem

FREE FUCKING SPEECH

STOP FUCKING INTRUDING

BUSH!

lol

also depends what flag they are burning

no immigration

in the case of burning a North Korean flag or something it'd technically be alright, North korea is not a very liked state which would allow for people ot be able to burn the flag and not suffer concequences unless they accidentally start a fire

I'd say the only flag people should get penalized for burning is a regional or federal flag

@PebbЛe this

Have a fine for burning it, but along those lines make printing it all over random commercialised shit made in other countries a crime too

flag burning's all good

tbh it seems like a meaningless form of protest but what do i know

Only legal if it's our enemy 💪🏻

If you burn the flag of your country, the rehabilitation process should take place, whether it be mental help to cure mental illness or to jail

jail is not rehabilitation in the us

so that makes it trickier

I think it can be

Let's be careful to be patriotic without turning our flags and symbols into idols.

Nationalism is god-given

nationalism is normal

Nationalism is natural and God-given

Of course!

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should women balance homelife and careers, or should they be required to pick one over the other? Explain

dumb question

gay question

read the bible

^

@Obungus It was a request

1 Timothy 2:12

is enough

read it

Say no@Deleted User

rip, I'll just ask a better one next time

good!

Different obviously, and we don't need the Torah or whatever to know it

read ezekiel 4:12

How about I reword it to this:

"Should women balance homelife and careers, or should they be required to pick one over the other?"

gay question still

The answer is obvious

Good question lazydaze

nope

There are definitely differences between men and women, both physical and mental.

Froce is wrong don't listen to "him"

I think the best most appropriate answer i can muster up is as follows:

COLLECTIVE

rip

Women should have a limited role in the workplace

if at all

Their duty is to be homemakers

And anyone who disagrees is a libtard

dumb question man

rip

technically most people should work from home as farmers/tradesmen anyway so women are no exception

I'd change it to a different one, but I don't want to ping @'everyone twice

Depends on the situation in my opinion

@ken what kind of situation?

I'd say in the overwhelming majority of circumstances, they should be at home

They should stay home once they have children. Prior part time work maybe.

women can do what they want it's not my choice

But it does affect you at some point or another

Late, but Agreed ^

It’s a women’s choice, and wether or not it affects you doesn’t mean you have a right to have a say in it.

Lots of things “effect” people but aren’t about them

The price of gas “effects” you but that doesn’t mean you get to choose what it costs

Women who are stay at home moms have better lives

this is a scientific fact

society is also better off with women being homemakers

^

What about the case where a women has to work for income, either to support just herself or her children. If her role is to take care of the children wouldn't ensuring there's money to feed the kids and pay for rent be part of that?

@Alexander Ramsey “better” is completely subjective and useless in an argument like this

So you can’t scientifically prove that