im not even sure what this conversation is about tbh

I have a black friend who agrees with white ethnostates

I am that friend.

I have a 1/100th injun friend who I redpilled and now he wants to kill himself

https://youtu.be/eaQHjzVUkNs

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-russia-jewish-farage-brexit-698486

jesus christ nigel

@snakedog @ham addition
Farage is /ourguy/

your guy is shit

How @ham addition

Based Nigel

What a lad

Hope remains

Will the new ukip leader, Sargon, disavow?

Sargon has been getting mighty high on his own shit

I think in a video as of late he called "hunting Tl;DR"

literalyl said somethign along the lines of "You wont be laughing when I get a interview with trump. but then you'll say 'oh everyone gets na inerview with trump' "

Fucking autism.

@JogaFlame Serious channel is without slander

@Doctor Anon But sargoy.

https://youtu.be/s1PL3xQu16w

@JogaFlame s e r i o u s

S A R R G O O O O O O Y @Doctor Anon

ok let me stop.

Lucky I haven't warned you yet

commit die

I guess it goes here

owo

What

nutin

>hitler supporting white people owning black slaves in the us wasnt racial

hmm

lol

@The Big Oof

@bimmler
Yesterday someone posted a meme that I think fits perfectly as a response
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463779195114225685/492183107873538077/DlVsob-XoAUSUzN.png

What makes you think big business should go unchecked? Especially when they rally behind policies like open borders that they know will drive down wages

Peron had great success with his fascist and third way economics.

Hitler, while certainly pro-private property, implemented social policies that led to an economic miracle in Germany.

>communism

literally the definiton of communism is having no state but go off i guess

@ham addition I think the thought process is that communism requires a big government to reach its end point

most non-tankie communists believe in smaller collectives like local councils having the most power

I know

But the thought process is that it's always going to result in a large government

even if it is not the intent

the problem is that they first have to wrench the power from the government and restructure society into the new social order.

that usually involves central planning, because people are not naturally inclined that way

These dudes are just as much as a joke as ANTIFA

But why are they treated different, by the law and socially? *(This is to begin a discussion; I’m genuinely interested on other’s outlooks.)*

Treated differently in what aspect

Like how they’re seen by the general public?

Yes, and how their message is contrasted to their beliefs and actions.

For instance, CNN and other legacy media outlets portray ANTIFA as some kind of “good guy” or ignores their presence completely, meanwhile putting all lights on Alt-Right groups when crimes are committed by their members.

They even called the guy who killed that woman at the protest an “alt right Nazi”

I was once a leftist

The only thing they were right about was that racism is wrong

Everything else they stood for were despicable lies

I feel like racism and xenophobia are a part of human condition.

"The only thing they were right about was that racism is wrong"

HOLD IT RIGHT THERE

I wouldn't say it's wrong, it's more like a barrier you can overcome for better relations.

Hot take: Racism is natural

That doesn't mean you have to go up in arms about somebody being annoyed that their country is flooded with mongrels, and disgusting, loathesome wretches.

Quick tip: Somalians hate other Somalians because they're nasty, depraved curs.

Dirty, diseased, crime-loving, and lazy

It's not racist to make an obvious observation of behaviour.

@The Big Oof ?

I would hate a person based on what he believes and does

The problem is that certain people are more inclined to believe certain things and do certain things @warriorman8

Basing it on ethnicity is arbitrary

It's not

If I found them generally distasteful, and unseemly as a majority, I would definitely dislike the nationality as a whole.

Like Somalians.

You're also going in it with a different understanding of the topic than I have, that is to say, you're arguing with the assumption I also think race is skin deep.

I do not @warriorman8

I mean you can distrust a person but not punish them over it

Protecting your country isn't punishing anyone

Well, I'm going to distrust them until they become a problem.

It's a country's right

to exclude who it wants

A country need not allow people into it.

Sure, just like I need not save someone who's about to be run over by a train.

You can just enforce law

True.

It's kinda a shitty thing to do,but I don't *need* to do it.

Why would you?

You would be putting yourself at risk for potentially no reward.

If I could easily do it with minimal risk to myself, then because of basic human empathy

Saving someone else is a reward in and of itself.

For example supreme general duterte is under an ongoing war with criminals

Basic human empathy shouldn't need to be explained

Duterte is a criminal himself, ironically

You have to have an extremely high IQ to understand human empathy

Define criminal

So...

He straight up extra-judicially kills people, such as drug dealers

How do you enforce the law without punishments?