Bruh

But Adam and Eve were both white, so how the heck were black people made

depends on the stage of the fetus (also murder is the *unlawful* killing of a person so it would be manslaughter not murder)

Or Asians

i have already told you how @Mr. Meatball

Thats a very good question i cannot answer

No you haven’t

@Mr. Meatball but how do we know they were white?

Well if they weren’t white there are still way more races that just 2 people couldn’t produce

The ‘history is all fake’ crowd tend to have an agenda as well. Sure history is written by the winners, but they didn’t put millions of balls of 98% pure sulfur (which can’t occur in nature) along the Dead Sea where the five cities were located.

According to Abraham it rained fire and sulfur against those 5 cities and turned them into ash (calcium carbonate).

Pure sulfur isn’t natural.

You get 38-40% sulfur from volcanic activity.

https://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2008/05/Sodom-and-Gomorrah-Is-There-Evidence-for-Their-Destruction.aspx

http://godasmywitness.com/have-the-ruins-of-sodom-and-gomorrah-been-found/

https://youtu.be/eI34BVEXhJc

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/335401793620017152/486135563322392576/image0.jpg

Remember pregnancy is never perfect

It’s from the ruins of ghomorrah.

The walls were a limestone concrete. They were heated to a point where they’re were baked into calcium phosphate.

And there’s no volcanic activity there.

Which is why people who have this really profane understanding of ‘what the Bible really means’ when you can go here yourself and see the ruins.

Also if the Adam and Eve story is true, that makes us all ret*rd babies

I don’t know if I’ll get warned again for swearing so I censored myself

The Saudi authorities have this entire area cordoned off. They don’t patrol it but you’re not allowed to go there.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484538352574529557/486418441956229120/image0-9-1-1.jpg

It rained fire!
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484538352574529557/486416640725090305/image0-17-1.jpg

but gohmorrah is thought to be in Syria, which did have volcanic activity during the Bronze Age

It’s named Mt Sinai.
It was named that maybe a century ago.
This is Jabal al Lawz. Which was the name and still is the name of the real location.
I’m assuming they changed the location to keep away the curious.
I don’t know for sure but into looks pretty damn literal to me.

Below... it is the real mt Sinai with black, heated rock at the top.

These drawings are all over that rock. And it’s in the valley with the real mt Sinai.

The valley with the altar to the golden calf. I think these qualify as ‘primary source observation’

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458199261637771264/494315305947103263/image0-24.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458199261637771264/494315306651615254/image0-11.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458199261637771264/494315307297406976/image0-25.jpg

https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/destruction-sodom-and-gomorrah-earthquakes-or-volcanoes

Ron Wyatt found the Ark in turkey (not ON mt Ararat). He’s also the guy who found this region which was already slightly patrolled.

Well he didn’t find the ark. But he’s he first person to lead an expedition to shoot X-rays into the ground to figure out what it was.

The charlatans in the mainstream creationism community claim the ark is on mt Ararat and also that mt Sinai is in the Sinai National Park. That’s why I view the mainstream creationism groups as controlled opposition like Flat Earth Society.

Ararat is of course in the distance from this object. But the Bible says it landed in the region OF Ararat not ON Ararat.

This is my single greatest criticism of the ppl who says history is totally faked by the Vatican.
1) that’s an unprovable assumption
2) I have evidence of history from accidental confirmation (high altitude photography)
3) I have evidence of history from explorative confirmation (piecing together biblical writings to find the five cities which were exactly where it said they would be) It also attributes more power to the church than they actually have. But they’d love for everyone to think they have hat kind of power.
Same with governments. Strongest flood evidence is geology, polystrata fossils etc. The entire Eastern USA was a lake that drained through the Grand Canyon. We are seeing proof!This is pretty good primary evidence.This isn’t some made up Greek writing stuff down in a dusty hall. This is archeological remains.Which weren’t discovered until the 1940s.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484538352574529557/486419611638562816/image0-20-1.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484538352574529557/486419611638562819/image0-18-1.jpg

heres my source if you want it

well its above the last comment but its pretty big

@Mr. Meatball

Yes?

Nobody is perfect due to their mistake

It makes more sense than humans evolving

Because if so why wouldent we see it more

And saying the thing died out is a lame excuse

racial evolution makes sense to me

What, no it doesn’t

Not you Josh

Racial evolution does make sense

I cannot imagine life without evolution

I can

It makes sense

I think that Jesus was a real person but he was not the son of god

Adam and eve sin

Get kicked out of the garden

Start life

Flood takes everyone beside 2

They make more babies

There’s no proof of Adam and Eve though

I think there is

my problem with the creationist theory is the 6000 years old thing cause that makes no sense

I think that the most likely explanation for human life is that there is a god, but it’s not the Christian god or any other god people on earth have heard of

It’s just some random god who decided to make us one day

Well there have been people who have died and went to heaven but got sent back

https://youtu.be/QdUGoFTfP7w

Good book btw

Yeah but other people have died and not remembered anything but darkness until they are brought back

They say it felt disgusting

Called going to hell mg

Everyone goes to heaven

And after judgement they either stay or get sent down

Hell is fire and torture

Yup

Crud I forgot

Dm

I can say it without swearing

If god really does send people to hell just for being atheist, then he’s a huge jerk

No

No

yes

You need to accept god into your heart

Its their choice

some people never learn about christianity

He gives you a chance to accept him

so that makes no sense

When the 2nd coming happens everyone will have chance after chance to accept him before judgement

I think that if the christian God is the real one, good people go to heaven even if they arent christian, like gandhi

If you’re an amazing person that has done nothing wrong but just didn’t believe in him because there wasn’t any proof and you go to hell for it, that’s a terrible thing for a god to do to someone

Wether your perfect or not we all sinned

Remember dude

We were born from adam and eve

We arent our own species

what

thats stupid

If I go to hell because I don’t believe in the Christian god, I’m going to go to satan and make a deal with him to take over heaven and become best bros

@Mr. Meatball just like someone bullying your sister, you give them many chances to stop and they dont so you kick their as

Is that being a jerk?

@Mr. Meatball uh the devil is being destroyed

That’s different to not believing in someone because there isn’t any proof of them

No, he’s still alive and well

im gonna shoot a basketball through gods halo

Satan currently dwells in hell

I know

After jesus comes back satan is being destoryed

He already has

He was the most beautiful angel their was

But he rebelled god

Jesus was real but he was not the son of god, and he stayed dead

And all he wants is for people to betray god

thomas is a muslim

@Mr. Meatball bruh he died and was resurrected

I would too if god was that much of a jerk

**HOW**

Because he was by god

Who is Thomas?

In the bible it talks about how the stone was rolled away from the tomb

Now i gotta get a shower

Its been a good debate

Gg

Bye bye

In both creation and evolution theories, there is a big question: What started it all? What caused God to exist, and what caused the big bang to occur

I do not know personally (nobody does) but the evolutionary theory is useful as a tool to predict what will and has happened on earth, so I'm sticking with it

Exactly

You’re completely right

Gay

https://youtu.be/qRy8822mM7Y

Produce shows how we have used evolution for the betterment of society

yea the real question is what is the mechanism of action of evolution

The Remains Of Sodom & Gomorrah Found By Ron Wyatt. God Left The Evidence For Us All To See. https://youtu.be/A_EiCvsK3KE

I've got doubts

then you better resolve them soon

pope said evo is real lol

lol

So uh why did god give whales pelvic bones

why is structural element that is similar to another one but serves a similar purpose and does the job efficiently there.

https://youtu.be/jRU0FXcf76Q

Please somebody give me a somehow valid reason that evolution doesn’t exist

I want to argue

That article was stupid

How do you know the age of the fossils?

by which rock layer we find them in

How do you know the age of the rock layer?

by which fossils we find in them

__**SCRIPTURE ALONE**__

A Christian server with the ultimate mission of reaching people with the gospel while being a safe and friendly community for Christians first.

*WHAT WE OFFER*

⭐ Bible studies
⭐ Resources to assist you in learning about the bible
⭐ Prophetic news updates
⭐ Fellowship and general chat with friends
⭐ Everyone welcome with roles for atheists, agnostics, alternative beliefs etc
⭐ We don't ping
⭐ Active most of the time
⭐ Weekly polls
⭐ Christian reddit feed
⭐ Verse of the day
⭐ Reaction roles
⭐ Custom bots
⭐ Great emoji selection
⭐ KJV Audio Bible
⭐ Christian Radio

**Invite link:**
https://discord.gg/F9h6YBp

-----

paleontology

archaeology

astronomy

theoretical physics

Earth science

geology

am I missing one ?

@MelonWelon where's the scientific proof for evolution? It's obvious adaptation happens but a complete change from one species to another is not proven scientifically.

We have heaps of evidence for speciation (micro- and macroevolution); from the lab and the wild, embryology, hybridisation, morphology, fossil records, dna analysis, chromosomal changes...

Speciation is microevolution. not macroevolution. for which we have no evidence. we've never observed a bird produce a non-bird.

Macroevolution starts with speciation. It's hard to draw the line between micro and macro. Macro is basically an accumulation of micro over time

There is no scientific evidence to support that. it's an opinion

and you know it

I can send you a list of scientific peer reviewed papers on it, if you're interested?

only if they contain repeatable experiments where a bird turns into a non-bird. if it's paleontology data it's useless. it tells you nothing because it's not science. they cannot apply the scientific method. one has to dream up a story to explain it. science: directly observable, testable, repeatable, and falsifiable. if your papers meet those critieria then please attach the links. if not, you may as well print them out and use them for toilet paper

"Where a bird turns into a non-bird". Yea, that's not how science works. I believe you're talking about magic.. Palaeontology and palaeoecology are not useless, but ok, I mean, palaeontology is a scientific field after all. Try again
You want empirical evidence? Sure thing, here you go. Four links to start you off https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ele.12460, https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12374, https://www.pnas.org/content/116/27/13440, https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/37/1/183/5570178

all microevolution (speciation/adaptation)

as expected

bcs macroevolution is impossible

paleontology is not a scientific field. they cannot apply the scientific method. they look at fossils

a fossil can't even tell you that if that organism even reproduced...

You didn't seem to read what I said, so let me repeat (no worries mate, you're good). Micro describes mechanisms that alter the frequencies of alleles (within species), yea? Macro describes patterns at a grand scale across vast time periods. The only difference is the timescale involved. Cool? Btw, what do you mean by "they cannot apply the scientific method"?

what am i supposed to get from this?

@Flat Earth PhD the fact that the fossil is there means it's parents reproduced at one point smh.... The study of fossils proves evolution

👍

I'm glad we agree

yes you are right

No, please. I want you to prove me wrong

Dunning kruger effect meme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ3hUlU0vR4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTtxlaeC9PY

https://www.icr.org/article/evolution-hopes-you-dont-know-chemistry-problem-wi/

Eternal happiness is being with loved ones

Truee 😍

I believe in the ancient godd ctulhu who we are all slave to his majesty